考察产业集群企业贡献水平对共性技术合作创新至关重要。本文通过建立集群企业的双寡头模型, 分析集群企业贡献水平在纳什均衡和帕累托最优时的不同, 得到帕累托最优下的贡献水平要优于纳什均衡下的贡献水平的命题。围绕命题, 考虑产业集群的因素, 提炼出有利于集群企业在共性技术合作创新中实现帕累托最优贡献水平的合作创新模式, 并从契约公平的角度设计出组织运行机制。最后, 以成功实例印证了该模式的可行。
Abstract
It is of great importance to inspect the industrial cluster enterprise contribution level in generic technology cooperation innovation. By establishing the cluster enterprise duopoly model and analyzing the best contribution level difference between Nash equilibrium and Pareto optimality, this paper comes to the proposition that the contribution of Pareto optimality is better than Nash equilibrium. Around this proposition and considering factors of industrial clusters, a cooperative innovation mode is extracted, which is conducive to achieving Pareto optimality for cluster enterprises in generic technology cooperation innovation. Furthermore, an organization operation mechanism is designed from the perspective of contract justice. In the end, the feasibility of the mode is proved by successful case.
关键词
贡献水平 /
产业集群 /
共性技术 /
合作模式
Key words
contribution level /
industry cluster /
generic technology /
cooperation mode
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Tassey Gregory.The economics of R&D policy[M].Quorum books, USA, 1997.
[2] 杜国 贞, 肖岭.构建传统产业集群共性技术供给体系—一项对比研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2006, 13(9):71－76.
[3] 虞锡君.产业集群内关键共性技术的选择—以浙江为例[J].科研管理, 2006, 27(1):56－61.
[4] Sampson R.C.2004.Organizational choice in R&D alliances:Knowledge-based and transaction cost perspectives[J].Management and Decision Economics, 25 (6-7):421-436.
[5] D'Aspremont Claude, Jacquemin Alexis.Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers[J].American Economic Review, 1988, 78:1133-1137.
[6] Roberto Cellini, Luca Lambertini.Dynamic R&D with spillovers:Competition vs cooperation[J].Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2009, 33(3):568-582.
[7] Jhon Hagedoorn.Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering:Inter organizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences[J].Strategic Management Journal, 1993, 14:371-385.
[8] Tao Zhigang, Wu Chang.On the organization of cooperative research and development:Theory and Evidence [J].International Journal of Industrial Organization, 1997, 15(5):573-596.
[9] Pastor Maite, Sandonis Joe.Research joint ventures vs cross licensing agreements:An agency approach[J].International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2002, 20(2):215-249.
[10] Claudia Schmiedeberg.Complementarities of innovation activities:An empirical analysis of the German manufacturing sector[J].Research Policy, 2008, 37(9):1492-1503.
[11] John Hagedoorn.Inter-firm R&D partnerships:An overview of major trends and patterns since 1960[J].Research Policy, 2002, 31(4):477-492.
[12] Damiano B.Silipo.Incentives and forms of cooperation in research and development[J].Research in Economic, 2008, 62(2):101-119.
[13] 周二华, 陈荣秋.技术开发的类型与创新模式选择的关系[J].科研管理, 1999, 20(4):15-20.
基金
重庆市重点软科学基金:重庆市信息工业企业簇创新集群化发展的模式设计, 项目编号-CSCT 2010 CE 0035, 2010.6-2011.12;重庆市经信委十二五规划专项基金:重庆市特色工业园区十二五专项规划, 项目编号-CJXW 2010 ZX, 2010.3-2010.12;重庆大学研究生科技创新基金:重庆市工业园区技术创新能力提升方式研究, 项目编号- CSCT 2010 CE9071,2010.3-2011.12。
