纳米科技国际合作创新网络结构与演化特征研究

科研管理 ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 41-49.

纳米科技国际合作创新网络结构与演化特征研究

刘云¹, 蒋海军¹, 樊威¹, 闫哲¹, 叶选挺²

1. 北京理工大学管理与经济学院, 北京 100081;
2. 清华大学公共管理学院, 北京 100084

收稿日期:2014-07-01 修回日期:2014-12-01 出版日期:2015-02-25 发布日期:2015-02-14
作者简介:刘云(1963-), 男(汉), 安徽合肥人, 教授、博士生导师, 研究方向:科技评价、创新管理。
蒋海军(1974-), 男(汉), 湖北随州人, 博士研究生, 研究方向:知识溢出、创新管理。
樊威(1985-), 男(汉), 河南开封人, 博士研究生, 研究方向:科技管理、创新管理。
闫哲(1991-), 男(汉), 山东菏泽人, 博士研究生, 研究方向:科技管理、创新管理。
叶选挺(1983-), 男(汉), 浙江温州人, 博士后, 研究方向:科技评价、创新管理。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点项目“国家自主创新体系国际化理论与政策研究”(71033001);国家自然科学基金面上项目“我国专利申请量增长的影响因素及动力机制研究”(71273030)。

Study on the structure and evolution characteristics of international collaborative innovation network of nano science and technology

Liu Yun¹, Jiang Haijun¹, Fan Wei¹, Yan Zhe¹, Ye Xuanting²

1. School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China;
2. School of Public Policy and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Received:2014-07-01 Revised:2014-12-01 Online:2015-02-25 Published:2015-02-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文基于国际合作论文数据检索与挖掘, 对纳米科技国际合作创新网络进行了系统分析, 描绘了合作网络的总体特征, 并利用基尼系数、核心边缘分布、中心性、聚类、数据可视化等方法分析了合作网络的结构和演进特征。研究发现, 中国在纳米国际科技合作网络中的地位愈加重要, 正成为美国之外的另一极;法国和南非在网络中发挥了桥梁和中介作用;越来越多国家意识到纳米科技的重要性, 着力通过国际合作推进本国纳米科技的发展。

关键词: 纳米科技, 国际合作, 网络结构, 演化特征, 文献计量

Abstract: This paper conducts a systematic analysis on international collaborative innovation network of nano science and technology. The paper delineates the general characteristics of the collaborative network, and utilizes the methods like Gini coefficient, core-edge distribution, centrality, clustering, and data visualization to analyze its structure and evolution characteristics. The paper finds that the role of China becomes increasingly significant in the collaborative network. France and South Africa plays an intermediary role as a bridge in the network. More and more countries realize the importance of nano science and technology, and make their endeavor on promoting the development of their own country's nano science and technology through international collaboration.

Key words: nano science and technology, international collaboration, network structure, evolution characteristics, bibliometrics

中图分类号:

G255.51

刘云, 蒋海军, 樊威, 闫哲, 叶选挺. 纳米科技国际合作创新网络结构与演化特征研究[J]. 科研管理, 2015, 36(2): 41-49.

Liu Yun, Jiang Haijun, Fan Wei, Yan Zhe, Ye Xuanting. Study on the structure and evolution characteristics of international collaborative innovation network of nano science and technology[J]. Science Research Management, 2015, 36(2): 41-49.

参考文献

[1] 白春礼. 全面理解纳米科技内涵促进纳米科技在我国的健康发展[J]. 微电子技术, 2003(1): 1-4. [2] 任红轩. 转变纳米科技发展模式迎接纳米科技产业新挑战[J]. 新材料产业, 2012(4): 21-24. [3] 兆文. 美国国家纳米技术计划[J]. 中国新技术新产品精选, 2001(Z1): 44-45. [4] 冯瑞华, 张军, 刘青. 主要国家纳米技术战略研究计划及其进展[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2007(7): 213-216. [5] Pei R., Porter A.L. Profiling leading scientists in Nano-biomedical science: Interdisciplinarity and potential leading indicators of research directions [J]. R&D Management, 2011, 41 (3): 288-306. [6] Pei R., Porter A.L., and Youtie J., Nano-biomedical science in China: Growth and challenges [J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2012, 24 (3):14-20. [7] Shapira P., Youtie J. The economic contributions of nanotechnology to green and sustainable growth [C]. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and the US National Nanotechnology Initiative, Washington DC, 27-28 March 2012. [8] Tang L., Shapira P. Effects of international collaboration and knowledge moderation on China's nanotechnology research impacts [J]. Journal of Technology Management in China, 2012, 7 (1): 94-110. [9] 张玉华, 潘云涛, 马峥. 从文献计量看世界纳米研究的发展状况[J]. 世界科技研究与发展, 2003(3): 48-51. [10] Ronald N., Kostoff, Raymond G. Koytcheff, Clifford G.Y.Lau,赵亚娟. 全球纳米技术研究文献计量分析[J].科学观察. 2007(4):189-203. [11] 石庆平, 吴鸣. 用CA数据库进行纳米科技的文献计量分析[J]. 世界科技研究与发展, 2006(6): 62-68. [12] 王刚波, 官建成. 纳米科学与技术之间的联系:基于学术型发明人的分析[J]. 中国软科学, 2009(12): 36-41. [13] 万勇, 马廷灿, 潘懿. 微纳制造技术文献计量分析[J]. 制造技术与机床, 2012(1): 112-124. [14] Guan J.C., Ma N. China's emerging presence in nanoscience and nanotechnology—A comparative bibliometric study of several nanoscience giants [J]. Research Policy, 2007, 36 (6): 880–886. [15] Tang L., Shapira P. China-US scientific collaboration in nanotechnology: patterns and dynamics [J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 88 (1): 1-16. [16] Ye X., Liu Y, Porter A.L. International collaborative patterns in China's nanotechnology publications [J]. International Journal of Technology Management, 2012, 59 (3/4): 255-272. [17] Mogoutov A., Kahane B. Data search strategy for science and technology emergence: A scalable and evolutionary query for nanotechnology tracking [J]. Research Policy, 2007, 36: 893-903. [18] Porter A.L., Youtie J., Shapira P.,and Schoeneck D.J. Refining search terms for nanotechnology [J]. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2008, 10 (5): 715-728. [19] Arora S.K., Porter A.L., Youtie J., and Shapira P. Capturing new developments in an emerging technology: An updated search strategy for identifying nanotechnology research outputs [J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 95 (1): 351-370. [20] Zitt M., Bassecoulard E. Delineating complex scientific fields by a hybrid lexical-citation method: An application to nanoscience [J]. Information Processing and Management, 2006, 42:1513-1531. [21] Leydesdorff L., Zhou P. Nanotechnology as a field of science: Its delineation in terms of journals and patents [J].Scientometrics, 2007, 70 (3): 693-713. [22] Borgatti S.P., Everett M.G. Models of core/periphery structure [J]. Social Networks, 2000, 21 (4): 375-395. [23] Freeman L.C. Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification [J]. Social Networks, 1979, 1: 215-239. [24] Shneiderman B., Aris A. Network visualization by semantic substrates [J]. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2006, 12 (5): 733-740.