在华跨国公司母子双向知识流动及其转移逻辑

刘明霞, 于飞

科研管理 ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2) : 160-166.

科研管理 ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2) : 160-166.
论文

在华跨国公司母子双向知识流动及其转移逻辑

  • 刘明霞1, 于飞1,2
作者信息 +

Parent-subsidiary's two-way knowledge flows and transfer logics in the MNCs' investments in China

  • Liu Mingxia1, Yu Fei1,2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

本文对跨国公司在华投资母子间的知识流动及其决定因素进行实证调查, 得到三个结论:(1)母子间存在双向知识转移, 且传统知识转移与逆向知识转移程度不同;(2)双向知识转移的决定因素有较大差异, 母子关系和受方吸收能力只影响传统转移, 而知识相关性、子公司技术依赖和子公司知识活动能力只影响逆向转移;(3)本文根据相关信息推理出在华跨国公司双向转移的逻辑与已往文献不同, 传统知识转移不是一个简单的教授过程而是体现母公司意图、子公司认同的教授过程, 逆向转移也不是学者所说的子公司说服过程而是母公司主动发现、主宰的选择过程。

Abstract

This study empirically investigated knowledge flows between MNC parents and subsidiaries in China and three conclusions were obtained. First, there are two-way knowledge flows between MNC parents and subsidiaries and conventional knowledge transfers are different from and more than reverse knowledge transfers. Second, the determinants of two-way knowledge flows are not the same. Conventional knowledge transfers are associated with the receivers' absorptive capacity and the relationships between the parents and subsidiaries, while reverse knowledge transfers are associated with knowledge relevance, subsidiaries' technological dependence on their parents and their capacity involved in knowledge activities. Third, according to related information, we inferred that the transfer logics of conventional knowledge transfer and reverse knowledge transfer within MNCs in China are different from the existing literatures, namely, the former is not a simple teaching process but rather a teaching process with the knowledge provider's intent and the receiver's recognition, while the latter is not a persuasive process as claimed by the other scholar, but a discovering and selective process dominated by MNC parents.

关键词

双向知识流动 / 传统知识转移 / 逆向知识转移 / 转移逻辑

Key words

two-way knowledge flows / conventional knowledge transfer / reverse knowledge transfer / transfer logic

引用本文

导出引用
刘明霞, 于飞. 在华跨国公司母子双向知识流动及其转移逻辑[J]. 科研管理. 2015, 36(2): 160-166
Liu Mingxia, Yu Fei. Parent-subsidiary's two-way knowledge flows and transfer logics in the MNCs' investments in China[J]. Science Research Management. 2015, 36(2): 160-166
中图分类号: F276.7   

参考文献

[1] Kuemmerle W. The drivers of foreign direct investment into research and development: an empirical investigation [J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 1999, 30(1): 1-24. [2] Cantwell J, Mudambi R. MNC competence-creating subsidiary mandates [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2005, 26(12): 1109-1128. [3] Yang Q, Mudambi R, Meyer K.E. Conventional and reverse knowledge flows in multinational corporations [J]. Journal of Management, 2008, 34: 882-902. [4] Hkanson L, Nobel R. Technology characteristics and reverse technology transfer [J]. Management International Review, 2000, 40: 29-48. [5] 刘明霞. 中国跨国公司逆向知识转移研究[M].中国社会科学出版社,2012,12.Liu Mingxia. Reverse knowledge transfer within China MNCs [M]. China Social Sciences Press, 2012, 12. [6] Ambos T.C, Schlegelmilch B. Learning from foreign subsidiaries: An empirical investigation of headquarters' benefit from reverse knowledge transfers [J]. International Business Review, 2006, 15 (3): 294-312. [7] Gupta A.K, Govindarajan V. Knowledge flows within multinational corporations [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21: 473-496. [8] 新浪财经网. 专家称中国市场对跨国公司反哺效应放大[EB/OL]. http://finance.sina.com.cn/china/20121120/150013735464.shtml.Web of sina finance. Experts claim China market increasingly counter-breeds MNCs [EB/OL]. http://finance.sina.com.cn/china/20121120/150013735464.shtml. [9] 吴昌南,曾小龙. 西方跨国公司逆向知识转移研究综述[J]. 经济评论, 2013(1): 145-151.Wu Changnan, Zeng Xiaolong. Reverse knowledge transfer in Multinational Corporations: A Literature Review [J]. Economic Review, 2013(1): 145-151. [10] Mudambi R, Navarra P. Is knowledge power? Knowledge flows, subsidiary power and rent-seeking within MNCs [J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2004, 5: 385-406. [11] Birlknshaw H, Jonsson. Building firm-specific advantage in multinational corporations: The role of subsidiary initiative [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1998, 19: 221-241. [12] Kelley, H. The process of causal attribution [J]. American Psychologist, 1973, 28(2): 107-128. [13] Pérez-Nordtvedt L, Kedia B.L, etc. Effectiveness and efficiency of cross-border knowledge transfer: An empirical examination [J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2008, 45 (4): 714-744. [14] Tsai W, Ghoshal S. Social capital and value creation: The role of intra-firm networks [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1998, 41: 464-476. [15] Davenport T.H, Prusak L. Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know [M]. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA, 1998. [16] Björkman I, Barner-Rasmussen W, Li L. Managing knowledge transfer in MNCs: The impact of headquarters control mechanisms [J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2004, 35: 443-455. [17] Foss N, Pedersen T. Transferring knowledge in MNCs: The roles of sources of subsidiary knowledge and organizational context [J]. Journal of International Management, 2002, 8: 1-19. [18] 黃延聪.国际合资中本国母公司之学习意图、学习过程与学习成效[J].中华管理评论国际学报,2006, 9(3): 1-30.HuangYen-tsung. Learning intent, process and performance of local parents in international joint ventures [J]. Web Journal of Chinese Management Review, 2006, 9(3): 1-30. [19] Minbaeva D., etc. MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity and HRM [J]. Journal of International Business, 2003, 34 (6):586-599.

基金

国家自然科学基金项目“发展中国家跨国公司逆向知识转移及其治理机制研究”(70872086, 2009.1-2011.12), 武汉大学“70后”研究团队项目“中国企业的国际竞争力提升”(2012.10-2015.10)。


Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/