商业模式、创新双元性与企业绩效的关系研究

科研管理 ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (11): 29-36.

商业模式、创新双元性与企业绩效的关系研究

胡保亮

杭州电子科技大学管理学院, 浙江杭州 310018

收稿日期:2014-03-31 修回日期:2015-04-23 出版日期:2015-11-25 发布日期:2015-11-21
作者简介:胡保亮(1980-),男(汉),河南淮滨人,杭州电子科技大学管理学院副教授,硕士生导师,研究方向为商业模式与技术创新.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(71202156,2013-01至2015-12);浙江省自然科学基金项目(LY15G020020,2015-01至2017-12); "管理科学与工程"浙江省高校人文社科重点研究基地项目(ZD02-201501,2015-01至2015-12);浙江省信息化与经济社会发展研究中心项目(2013XXHJD005Y,2013-09至2016-08)。

Business models, innovation ambidexterity and firm performance

Hu Baoliang

School of Management, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, China

Received:2014-03-31 Revised:2015-04-23 Online:2015-11-25 Published:2015-11-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文旨在探讨商业模式如何通过创新双元性的中介作用对企业绩效产生影响。为此,本文提出了商业模式、创新双元性与企业绩效三者之间关系的研究假设,并通过应用层次回归分析方法对来自173家制造业企业的问卷调查数据进行实证分析检验了这些假设。研究结果表明:效率为中心的商业模式设计与新颖为中心的商业模式设计都对创新双元性具有显著的正向影响;创新双元性对企业绩效具有显著的正向影响;创新双元性分别在效率为中心的商业模式设计、新颖为中心的商业模式设计对企业绩效的影响中起部分中介作用。这些结论因揭示了商业模式对于企业绩效的间接影响而拓展了商业模式与企业绩效关系理论,同时对于企业建立商业模式模仿隔离机制具有一定指导意义。

关键词: 商业模式, 利用性创新, 探索性创新, 双元性, 企业绩效

Abstract: This paper aims to explore how business models affect firm performance through the mediating role of innovation ambidexterity. Therefore, the hypotheses of relationship among business models, innovation ambidexterity and firm performance are proposed,and these hypotheses are tested by using hierarchical regression analysis with data collected from 173 manufacturing firms.The results show that both efficiency-centered and novelty-centered business model designs have positive influence on innovation ambidexterity; innovation ambidexterity has positive influence on firm performance. The results also show that innovation ambidexterity partially mediates the relationship between efficiency-centered business model design and firm performance as well as the relationship between novelty-centered business model design and firm performance. This study expands the studies of the influence of business models on firm performance by showing the indirect influence of business models. This study may help firms figure out isolating mechanisms that can be used to prevent the business model from being undermined by competitors' imitation.

Key words: business model, exploitative innovation, exploratory innovation, ambidexterity, firm performance

中图分类号:

F270.7

胡保亮. 商业模式、创新双元性与企业绩效的关系研究[J]. 科研管理, 2015, 36(11): 29-36.

Hu Baoliang. Business models, innovation ambidexterity and firm performance[J]. Science Research Management, 2015, 36(11): 29-36.

参考文献

[1] Teece, D. J. Business models, business strategy and innovation[J]. Long Range Planning, 2010, 43(2/3):172-194. [2] Mitchell, D., Coles, C. The ultimate competitive advantage of continuing business model innovation[J].The Journal of Business Strategy, 2003, 24(5):15-21. [3] Zott, C., Amit, R. The fit between product market strategy and business model:Implications for firm performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2008, 29(1):1-26. [4]王翔,李东,张晓玲.商业模式是企业间绩效差异的驱动因素吗?——基于中国有色金属上市公司的ANOVA分析[J].南京社会科学,2010(5):20-26.Wang Xiang, Li Dong, Zhang Xiaoling. Are business models drivers of inter-firm performance difference:An empirical study of Chinese non-ferrous metals public companies[J]. Social Sciences in Nanjing, 2010(5):20-26. [5] Giesen, E., Berman, S. J., Bell, R., et al. Three ways to successfully innovate your business model[J]. Strategy & Leadership, 2007, 35(6):27-33. [6]吕鸿江,刘洪.基于匹配视角的商业模式与战略关系分析[J].东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2011,13(2):46-52. Lü Hongjiang, Liu Hong. An analysis of the match between the business model and strategy[J]. Journal of Southeast University (Philosophy and Social Science), 2011, 13(2):46-52. [7] Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J. Organizational ambidexterity:Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators[J]. Journal of Management, 2008, 34(3):375-409. [8] Simsek, Z., Heavey, C., Veiga, J. H., et al. A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity's conceptualizations, antecedents, and outcomes[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2009, 46(5):864-894. [9] O'Reilly, C. A., Tushman, M. L. Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability:Resolving the innovator's dilemma[J]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 2008, 28(1):185-206. [10] Jansen, J. J. P., Tempelaar, M. P., van den Bosch, F. A. J., et al. Structural differentiation and ambidexterity:The mediating role of integration mechanisms[J]. Organization Science, 2009, 20(4):797-811. [11] He, Z. L., Wong, P. K. Exploration vs. exploitation:An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis[J]. Organization Science, 2004, 15(4):481-494. [12] Jansen, J. J. P., George, G., van den Bosch, F. A. J., et al. Senior team attributes and organizational ambidexterity:The moderating role of transformational leadership[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2008, 45(5):982-1007. [13] Amit, R., Zott, C. Value creation in e-business[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2001, 22(6/7):493-520. [14] Brettel, M., Strese, S., Flatten, T. C. Improving the performance of business models with relationship marketing efforts:An entrepreneurial perspective[J]. European Management Journal, 2012, 30(2):85-98. [15] Zott, C., Amit, R. Business model design and the performance of entrepreneurial firms[J]. Organization Science, 2007, 18(2):181-199. [16] March, J. G. E. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning[J]. Organization Science, 1991, 2(1):71-87. [17] Hernández-Espallardo, M., Sánchez-Pérez, M., Segovia-López, C. Exploitation-and exploration-based innovations:The role of knowledge in inter-firm relationships with distributors[J]. Technovation, 2011, 31(5/6):203-215. [18] O'Reilly, C. A., Tushman, M. L. Organizational Ambidexterity in action:How managers explore and exploit[J]. California Management Review, 2011, 53(4):5-22. [19]罗倩,李东,蔡玫.商业模式对高新技术企业业绩的影响——对Zott模型的改进研究[J].科研管理,2012,33(7):40-47.Luo Qian, Li Dong, Cai Mei. The impact of business models on new -high -tech firms' performance -Improvement research on Zott model[J]. Science Research Management, 2012, 33(7):40-47. [20] Hu, B. Linking business models with technological innovation performance through organizational learning[J]. European Management Journal, 2014, 32(4):587-595. [21] Li, S., Lin, B. Accessing information sharing and information quality in supply chain management[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2006, 42(3):1641-1656. [22] Morgan, R. M., Hunt, S. D. The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing[J]. Journal of Marketing, 1994, 58(3):20-38. [23] Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., Zhang, H. Unpacking organizational ambidexterity:Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects[J]. Organization Science, 2009, 20(4):781-796. [24] Gilsing, V., Nooteboom, B., Vanhaverbeke, W., et al. Network embeddedness and the exploration of novel technologies:Technological distance, betweenness centrality and density[J]. Research Policy, 2008, 37(10):1717-1731. [25] Tushman, M. L., O'Reilly, C. A. Ambidextrous organizations:Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change[J]. California Management Review, 1996, 38(4):8-30. [26]李桦.战略柔性与企业绩效:组织双元性的中介作用[J].科研管理,2012,33(9):87-94.Li Hua. The impact of strategy flexibility on firm performance by using organizational ambidexterity as a meditative variable[J]. Science Research Management, 2012, 33(9):87-94. [27] Lee, C., Lee, K., Pennings, J. M. Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance:A study on technology-based ventures[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2001, 22(6/7):615-640. [28] Baron, R. M., Kenny, D. A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6):1173-1182.