隐性知识存在性表征及其传递过程模型

科研管理 ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (11) : 131-138.

论文

隐性知识存在性表征及其传递过程模型

高鹏, 安立仁

作者信息 +

The existence of tacit knowledge representation and its transfer process model

Gao Peng, An Liren

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

隐性知识表征直接影响隐性知识的传递与共享,隐性知识异于显性知识,其难以通过命题符号准确和完整的表征,但这无法否认其在人脑中的存在性。文章从认识论视角出发,通过个体隐性知识表征模型论证了隐性知识是人的知觉中关于事物之间联系与特定情境的整体心像。在信息论及隐性知识表征模型的基础上得出了隐性知识的传递模型,其由隐性知识源、隐性知识输出映射、隐性知识展示、镜像、信道、隐性知识感知、隐性知识输入映射和隐性知识宿八个部件构成,隐性知识传递通过这八个部件完成从隐性知识演示到隐性知识吸取的完整传递过程。隐性知识传递的目标是最小化隐性知识条件熵,最大化传递主体间的互隐性知识量。

Abstract

Tacit knowledge representations directly affect tacit knowledge transfer and sharing. Tacit knowledge is different from explicit knowledge, because it is difficult to be represented by propositional symbol accurately and completely, but we cannot deny its existence in the human brain. From the epistemological perspective and through the individual tacit knowledge representative model, this paper demonstrates that the tacit knowledge is the person's whole mental imagery which is concerned with particular situation and connections between entities. Based on the information theory and the tacit knowledge characterization model, the paper constructs the tacit knowledge transfer model. There are 8 parts in the tacit knowledge transfer model:the source, output mapping, show, mirror, channel, perception, input mapping and destination of the tacit knowledge. The tacit knowledge transfer model completes the whole transfer process through the eight parts from tacit knowledge demonstration to tacit knowledge absorption. The target of the tacit transfer process is to minimize the tacit knowledge conditional entropy and to maximize the mutual tacit knowledge quantity between entities.

导出引用

高鹏, 安立仁. 隐性知识存在性表征及其传递过程模型[J]. 科研管理. 2015, 36(11): 131-138

Gao Peng, An Liren. The existence of tacit knowledge representation and its transfer process model[J]. Science Research Management. 2015, 36(11): 131-138

中图分类号： G302

参考文献

[1]野中郁次郎,竹内弘高.知识创造的企业-日美企业持续创新的动力[M].北京知识产权出版社,2006.Ikujiro Nonaka,Hirotaka Takeuchi.The knowledge-creating company——The power of enterprise's sustainable innovation[M].Intellectual Property Publishing House,2006. [2] Simonin B.Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategy alliances[J].1999(20):595-623. [3] Szulanski G.Exploring internal stickiness:Impediment to the transfer of best practice within the firm[J].Strategic Management Journal.1996(17):27-36. [4] Cummings J,Teng B.Transferring R&D knowledge:The key factors affecting knowledge transfer success[J].20(1-2).2003:39-65. [5] Dixon N M.Common knowledge:How companies thrive by sharing what they know[M].Boston:Harvard businesses school Press,2000. [6] Noh J,Al E.A case-based reasoning approach to cognitive map-driven tacit knowledge management[J].Expert Systems with Applications.2000(19):249-259. [7] Ambrosini V,Bowman C.Tacit knowledge:Some suggestions for operationalization[J].2001(38):811-829. [8] Koskinen K,Pililanto P,Vanharanta H.Tacit knowledge acquisition and sharing in a project work context[J].International Journal of Project Management.2003(21(4)):280-290. [9] Kostova T.Transnational transfer strategic organizational practices:A contextual perspective[J].Academy of management review.1999(24(2)):308-317. [10] Nonaka I,Toyama R,Konno N.SECI,ba and leadership:A unified model of dynamic k knowledge creation[J].2000(33(1)):5-34. [11] Nonaka I,Takeuchi H.The knowledge-creating company[M].New York:Oxford University Press,1995. [12]艾森克,基恩.认知心理学[M].华东师范大学出版社,2004.Eysenck,Keane.Cognitive psychology[M].East China Normal University Press,2004. [13] Pylyshyn.Z W.The imagery debate:Analogue media versus tacit knowledge[J].Psychological Review.1981(88):16-45. [14] Newell A,Simon H.Human problem solving[M].Englewood Cliffs.NJ:Prentice-Hall,1972. [15] Barasalou L W.Language comprehension:Archival memory or preparation for situated action[J].Discourse Processes.1999(28):61-80. [16] Barasalou.L W.Perceptual symbol system[J].Behavioral and Brain Science.1999(22):577-660. [17] Glaser.W R.Picture Naming[J].Cognition.1992(42):61-105. [18] Glenberg.A M,Robertson.D A.Symbol grounding and meaning:A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning[J].Journal of Memory and Language.2000(43):379-401.