科技园"温床"与"围城"效应对企业创新的影响研究

科研管理 ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1): 34-42.

科技园"温床"与"围城"效应对企业创新的影响研究

杨震宁¹, 李东红², 王玉荣¹

1. 对外经济贸易大学国际商学院, 北京 100029;
2. 清华大学经济管理学院, 北京 100084

收稿日期:2012-11-02 修回日期:2014-05-15 出版日期:2015-01-25 发布日期:2015-01-23
作者简介:杨震宁(1976-), 男(汉), 天津人, 管理学博士, 对外经济贸易大学国际商学院副教授, 硕士研究生导师, 研究方向为创新管理、战略管理;
李东红(1972-), 男(汉), 山西怀仁人, 管理学博士, 清华大学经济管理学院副教授, 博士研究生导师, 研究方向为战略管理;
王玉荣(1965-), 女(汉), 江西鹰潭人, 经济学博士, 对外经济贸易大学国际商学院教授, 博士研究生导师, 研究方向为技术经济、风险投资.
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目资助"不确定技术变革条件下的产业追赶机制研究:以中国(后发国家)的家电和汽车制造业为例",项目编号:12YJC790235,2012年1月-2014年12月;国家自然基金面上项目资助"社会网络视角下的中国跨国公司海外子公司知识转移研究",项目编号:71272019,2013年1月-2016年12月);国家社会科学基金规划项目资助"我国战略新兴产业技术创新路径研究",项目编号:12BGL019,2013年1月-2015年12月);对外经济贸易大学创新团队建设项目资助:"走出去"背景下中国企业创新能力提升战略创新团队,项目编号:CXTD-4-07,2013年9月-2016年9月).

Research on the influence of "Siege" and "Green House" effects in science parks on enterprises' innovation

Yang Zhenning¹, Li Donghong², Wang Yurong¹

1. Business School, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China;
2. School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Received:2012-11-02 Revised:2014-05-15 Online:2015-01-25 Published:2015-01-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 作为技术创造和技术转移的社会实验,建立科技园区可能成功也可能失败.本研究利用国内8个科技园内457家高技术企业的问卷调查数据,对科技园的"温床效应"、"围城效应"以及高技术企业组织战略对创新效果的调节作用进行了考察和实证检验,研究发现:科技园的"温床效应"和"围城效应"并存,而且其对创新的主效应作用明显,但是高技术企业采取合理的组织战略可以促进"温床效应"对创新的正向作用,并且合理的组织战略可以负向调节科技园"围城效应"对企业创新的抑制性作用.基于研究结论,本文也为政府相关部门和入驻科技园的高技术企业提出具有针对性的政策建议.

关键词: 科技园, 围城效应, 温床效应, 组织战略, 创新绩效

Abstract: As a social experiment of technology, the practice for our establishingscience parks may or may not succeed. This paper uses 457 high technology enterprises' questionnaire data in 8 domestic science parks to have researches on the influence of Science Parks' "Green House Effect", "Siege Effect" and high enterprises' strategy on innovation performance, and the research finds that: the domestic Science Parks' "Green House Effect" and "Siege Effect" coexist, and the main effect is obvious, but the high-tech enterprises' strategy can promote the positive effect of "Green House Effect" on innovation, and organization strategy can negatively regulates the effect of Science Parks' "Siege Effect" on enterprise innovation. Based on the conclusion, the paper also put forward some policy suggestions for the government departments and high-tech enterprises in science parks.

Key words: science park, Siege Effect, Green House Effect, enterprise strategy, innovation performanc

中图分类号:

F425

杨震宁, 李东红, 王玉荣. 科技园"温床"与"围城"效应对企业创新的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2015, 36(1): 34-42.

Yang Zhenning, Li Donghong, Wang Yurong. Research on the influence of "Siege" and "Green House" effects in science parks on enterprises' innovation[J]. Science Research Management, 2015, 36(1): 34-42.

参考文献

[1] Mariagrazia Squicciarini. Science parks' tenant versus out-of-park firms: Who innovates more? a duration model [J]. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2008, 33: 45-71. [2] Clark, W.W. Science parks: Theory and background [J]. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialization, 2003, 2: 50-78. [3] Löfsten, H., & Lindelöf, P. R&D networks and product innovation patterns: Academic and nonacademic new technology-based firms on science parks [J]. Technovation, 2005, 25: 1025-1037. [4] Lindelöf, P., &, Löfsten, H. Proximity as a resource base for competitive advantage: University industry links for technology transfer [J]. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2004, 29: 311-326. [5] Ferguson, R., & Olofsson C. Science parks and the development of NTBFs: Location, survival and growth [J]. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2004, 29: 5-17. [6] Link, A.N., Scott, J.T. Science parks and the generation of university-based knowledge: An exploratory study [J]. Int. J. Ind. Organ, 2003, 21 (9): 1323-1356. [7] Rickne, A. New technology-based firms and industrial dynamics: Evidence from the technology system of biomaterials in sweden, ohio and massachusetts [D]. Gothenburg: Department of Industrial Dynamics, Chalmers University of Technology. [8] Grayson, L. Science parks: An experiment in high technology transfer [M]. London: The British Library, 1993. [9] Westhead, P., Storey, D.J. An assessment of firms located on and off science parks in the united kingdom [M]. HMSO, London, 1994. [10] Davidsson, P., B. Kirchhoff, A. Hatemi-J, and H. Gustavasson. Empirical analysis of business growth factors using swedish data [J]. Journal of Small Business Management, 2002, 40(4): 332-349. [11] Olofsson, C. and C. Wahlbin. Firms started by university researchers in sweden-roots, roles, relations, and growth patterns [C]. Paper Presented at the 1993 Babson Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Howston, TX, March, 25-27, 1993. [12] 杨震宁,吴杰. 不同功能分类科技园的资源供给差异研究 [J]. 科研管理,2011(9):35-43.Yang Zhenning, Wu Jie. The resources supplies' difference by different functional science parks [J]. Science Research Management, 2011, 9(32): 35-43. [13] Massey, D., Quintas, P., & Wield, D. High-tech Fantasies. Science parks in society, science and space [M]. London: Routledge, 1992. [14] Bakouros, Y.L., Marda, D.C., Varsakelis, N.C. Science park, a high-tech fantasy?: An analysis of the science parks of greece [J]. Technovation, 2002, 22: 123-128. [15] Grossman, G. M., and E. Helpman. Innovation and growth in the global economy [M]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991. [16] Ottaviano, G. I. P., and J.F. Thisse. On economic geography in economic theory: Increasing returns and pecuniary externalities [J]. Journal of Economic Geography, 2001, 1: 153-179. [17] 刘雯雯,杨震宁,王以华. 科技园区服务创新、企业入驻动机和企业绩效的关系研究:一个整合模型 [J]. 科学学研究,2009(5):783-792.Liu Wenwen, Yang Zhenning, Wang Yihua. Management innovation in science parks, strategic motivation and enterprises' innovation achievements: A integrative model [J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2009, 5(27): 783-792. [18] 陆雄文,孙金云. 企业的核心能力与模仿式创新路径-新兴国家的视角 [J]. 经济理论与经济管理,2011(4):64-71.Lu Xiongwen, Sun Jinyun. A study on core competence and innovation path: From the perspective of emerging economy [J]. Economic Theory and Business Management, 2011, 4(31): 64-71. [19] 肖绍平,邓超. 双寡头核心能力发展竞争、学习追赶与核心能力均衡 [J]. 管理评论,2011(4):87-96.Xiao Shaoping, Deng Chao. The duopoly's game of core capability development, following strategy by learning and the equilibrium of core capability [J]. Management Review, 2011, 4(23): 87-96. [20] Francis C.C. Koh, Winston T.H. Koh, Feichin Ted Tschang. An analytical framework for science parks and technology districts with an application to singapore [J]. Journal of Business Venturing 2005, 20: 217-239. [21] F. Xavier Molina-Morales. The territorial agglomerations of firms: A social capital perspective from the spanish tile industry [J]. Growth and Change, 2005, 1(36): 74-99. [22] Scott B Droege, Jenny M Hoobler. Employee turnover and tacit knowledge diffusion: A network perspective [J]. Journal of Managerial Issues, 2005, 1: 54-60. [23] Davis Donald and D. Weinstein. Market access, economic geography and comparative advantage: An empirical assessment [J]. Journal of International Economics, 2003, 59(1):1-23. [24] 杨震宁,李东红. 中国制造业企业创新:行业竞争,嵌入集群的社会资本与技术战略选择 [J]. 财贸经济,2010(6):98-105.Yang Zhenning, Li Donghong. Enterprises' innovation in manufacturing industry: Competition, social capital embedded in the cluster and technical strategy choice [J]. Finance & Trade Economics, 2010, 6: 98-105. [25] Tijssen, R. J.W. Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: Patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows [J]. Research Policy, 2001, 30:35-54.