知识视角下动态能力对多元化战略影响的研究

PDF(1 KB)

科研管理 ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (9) : 98-105.

论文

知识视角下动态能力对多元化战略影响的研究

胡钢¹, 曹兴²

作者信息 +

Research on impact of dynamic capability on diversification strategy under the perspective of knowledge

Hu Gang¹, Cao Xing²

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

以知识观理论为出发点，研究动态能力对企业多元化的作用，并建立二者关系的结构方程模型。以制造业为研究对象，利用调查问卷收集数据，并进行实证检验。结果显示，动态能力对于基于创新的多元化有着显著的正向影响，知识整合能力对基于复制的多元化有显著正向影响，知识吸收与知识创造能力对多元化的影响部分是通过对知识整合能力间接起作用。特别的，知识吸收与知识创造能力对基于复制的多元化没有直接作用，必须通过知识整合能力对基于复制的多元化起作用。

Abstract

On the footing of knowledge-based view, this paper studies how dynamic capability influences corporate diversification and constructs structural equation model in view of the relation between the two. Taking the manufacturing industry as the research object, this paper collects data through questionnaire survey and carries out an empirical test. The results show that dynamic capability has significantly positive impacts on innovation-based diversity and knowledge integration capability also has significant positive effects on replication-based diversity. The effect of knowledge assimilation and knowledge creation ability upon diversity is partially achieved by knowledge integration ability. Knowledge assimilation and knowledge creation ability, in particular, produce no immediate effects on replication-based diversity. Knowledge integration ability is a must that produces effects on replication-based diversity.

导出引用

胡钢, 曹兴. 知识视角下动态能力对多元化战略影响的研究[J]. 科研管理. 2014, 35(9): 98-105

Hu Gang, Cao Xing. Research on impact of dynamic capability on diversification strategy under the perspective of knowledge[J]. Science Research Management. 2014, 35(9): 98-105

中图分类号： F272.3

参考文献

[1] Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management[J]. Strategic Management Journal. 1997, 18: 509-533. [2] Drnevich, P I, and Kriauciunas, A P. Clarifying the conditions and limits of the contributions of ordinary and dynamic capabilities to relative firm performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal. 2011, 32(2):254-279. [3] Barreto, I. Dynamic capabilities: A review of past research and an agenda for the future[J]. Journal of Management. 2010, 36(1):256-280. [4] Zhou, K Z, and Li, C B. How strategic orientations influence the building of dynamic capability in emerging economies[J]. Journal of Business Research. 2010, 63(3):224-231. [5] 冯军政, 魏江. 国外动态能力维度划分及测量研究综述与展望[J].外国经济与管理, 2011, 33(7):26-33. [6] 吴晓波.西方动态能力理论评述[J].国外社会科学, 2006(2): 18-25. [7] 郑素丽, 章威, 吴晓波.基于知识的动态能力:理论与实证[J].科学学研究, 2010, 28(3):405-411. [8] Prieto & Easterby-Smith. Dynamic capabilities and the role of organizational knowledge: An exploration[J]. European Journal of Information Systems. 2006, 15, 500-510. [9] Prieto, I.&Easterby-Smith, M. Dynamic capabilities and knowledge management-An integrative role for learning[J]. British Journal of Management. 2008, 19, 235-249. [10] Kessler, E., Allocca, M.&Rahman, N. External knowledge accession and innovation speed in the small and medium sized enterprise(SME)[J].Small Enterprise Research. 2007, 15 (1): 1-21. [11] Koberg, C.&Uhlenbruck, N.&Sarason, Y Facilitators of organizational innovation: The role of life-cycle stage[J]. Journal of Business Venturing. 1996, 11 (2): 133-149. [12] Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E.&Sapienza, H. Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms[J]. Strategic Management Journal. 2001, 22 (6-7): 587-613. [13] Narver, Slater, S. & MacLachlan, D. Responsive and proactive market orientation and new-product success[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2004, 21 (5): 334-347. [14] Gibbons, M.&Johnston, R. The roles of science in technological innovation[J]. Research Policy. 1974, 3 (3): 220-242. [15] Haro-Dominguez, M., Arias-Aranda, D.&Llorens-Montes, F. et al. The impact of absorptive capacity on technological acquisitions engineering consulting companies[J]. Technovation. 2007, 27 (8): 417-425. [16] Cohen WM, Levinthal DA. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly. 1990, 35(1): 128-152. [17] Rosenberg, Why do firms do basic research (with their own money)?[J]. Research Policy. 1990, vol. 19, issue 2, pages 165-174. [18] Eisenhardt & Brown, Competing on the edge: Strategy as structured chaos[J]. Long Range Planning. Volume 31, Issue 5, 12 October 1998, Pages 786-789. [19] Veugelers. Internal R & D expenditures and external technology sourcing[J]. Research Policy. Volume 26, Issue 3, October 1997, Pages 303-315. [20] 吴晓波. 二次创新的周期与企业组织学习模式[J].管理世界, 1995(3): 168-172. [21] Robins, J. A. & Wiersema, M. F. A resource-based approach to the multibusiness firm: Empirical analysis of portfolio interrelationships and corporate financial performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal. 1995, 16(4): 277-299. [22] Porter, M. E. Competitive strategy[M]. New York: Free Press.1985 [23] Tu, Q., Vonderembse, ma, Ragunathan, is and Sharkey, tw. Absorptive capacity: Enhancing the assimilation of time-based manufacturing practices[J]. Journal of Operations Management. 2006, 24: 692-710. [24] Andrawina, L. Govindaraju, R. Samadhi, T.A. Sudirman, I.. Absorptive capacity moderates the relationship between knowledge sharing capability and innovation capability[C]. Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2008. IEEE International Conference on Publication Date: 8-11 Dec. 2008: 944-948. [25] Stata, R. Organizational learning: The key to management innovation[J]. Sloan Management Review. 1989, 30: 63-74. [26] 侯杰泰, 温忠麟, 成子娟.结构方程模型及其应用[M]. 北京:教育科学出版社, 2004.