研发主管目标取向对团队反思与知识分享行为的影响

PDF(1 KB)

科研管理 ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (9) : 154-160.

论文

研发主管目标取向对团队反思与知识分享行为的影响

张文勤¹, 刘云²

作者信息 +

Effect of R&D team leader’s goal orientation on team reflexivity and knowledge sharing behavior

Zhang Wenqin¹, Liu Yun²

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

团队已经成为动态环境下企业从事研发活动的基本工作单元，而影响研发团队成员知识分享行为的主要因素一直是研究者关注的热点。本文以企业中的研发团队为研究对象，将团队反思纳入到研发主管目标取向对研发团队成员知识分享行为影响的研究中，并推导一个多层次研究框架。通过对118支研发团队（118名研发主管，605名研发员工）的调查分析，运用多层线性模型进行跨层次分析，得出实证研究结果：研发主管发展员工目标取向与能力展示目标取向对研发员工知识分享行为有显著正向影响；主管回避失败目标取向对知识分享行为具有显著负向影响；分析结果还表明，团队反思在研发主管发展员工取向与能力展示取向对知识分享行为的影响过程中起到中介作用。最后讨论了本研究的管理启示与研究展望。

Abstract

Effective teams are important cornerstones of successful organizations engaged in R&D activities, especially for those operating in dynamic environments. Based on the theory of Goal Orientation, the paper proposed a multilevel theoretical model in which the team reflexivity were included to examine the relationship between R&D team leader's goal orientation (LGO) and team member's Knowledge Sharing behavior. This study investigated 118 R&D teams, including 118 team leaders and 605 team members. Empirical results show that the dimensions of LGO have different relation with Knowledge Sharing behavior, and team reflexivity has a partial mediating effect on the relationship. Finally, limitations and suggestions for future research and practice are also discussed.

导出引用

张文勤, 刘云. 研发主管目标取向对团队反思与知识分享行为的影响[J]. 科研管理. 2014, 35(9): 154-160

Zhang Wenqin, Liu Yun. Effect of R&D team leader’s goal orientation on team reflexivity and knowledge sharing behavior[J]. Science Research Management. 2014, 35(9): 154-160

中图分类号： F270.7

参考文献

[1] Gold, A.H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective[J].Journal of Management Information Systems, 2001, 18: 185-214. [2] Vries RE, Hooff B. & Ridder JA, Explaining knowledge sharing: The role of team communication styles, job satisfaction, and performance beliefs[J].Communication Research, 2006, 33: 115 135. [3] Lee, H., & Choi, B. Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination[J].Journal of Management Information Systems, 2003, 20: 179-288. [4] Yang Jen-Te. Knowledge sharing: Investigating appropriate leadership roles and collaborative culture[J].Tourism Management, 2007, 28: 530 543. [5] Dragoni, Lisa. Understanding the emergence of state goal orientation in organizational work groups: The role of leadership and multilevel climate perceptions[J].Journal of Applied Psychology. 2005, 90: 1084-1095. [6] Dweck, C. S. Motivational processes affecting learning[J].American Psychologist, 1986, 41: 1040-1048. [7] Dweck, C. S. & E. L. Leggett. A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality[J]. Psychological Review, 1988, 95: 256-273. [8] Payne, Stephanie C., Youngcourt, Satoris S., & Beaubien, J. Matthew. A meta-analytic examination of the goal orientation nomological Net[J].Journal of Applied Psychology, 2007, 92:128-150. [9] West, M. A. Reflexivity and work group effectiveness: A conceptual integration. In West M A.(Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology[M]. Chichester, England: Wiley, 1996: 555-579. [10] Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory[M]. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs, 1986. [11] Guzzo, R. A., Noonan, K. A., & Elron, E. Expatriate managers and the psychological contract[J].Journal of Applied Psychology, 1994, 79: 617-626. [12] Ford, J. K., Smith, E. M., Weissbein, D. A., Gully, S. M., & Salas, E. Relationships of goal orientation, meta-cognitive activity, and practice strategies with learning outcomes and transfer[J].Journal of Applied Psychology, 1998, 83:218-233. [13] Dreu, D., Carsten, K. W. Cooperative outcome interdependence, task reflexivity, and team effectiveness: A motivated information processing perspective[J].Journal of Applied Psychology, 2007, 92: 628-638. [14] Hoegl, M., Parboteeah, K. P., Team reflexivity in innovative projects[J].R&D Management, 2006, 36: 113-125. [15] VandeWalle, D. Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument[J].Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1997, 57: 995-1015. [16] 张文勤, 刘云.研发团队反思的结构检验及其对团队效能与效率的影响[J]. 南开管理评论, 2011(3):26-33. [17] 林育理.组织知识活动气候对员工知识活动行为影响之研究:一个跨层次模式的验证[D]. 台湾元智大学博士论文, 2005. [18] 张雷, 雷雳, 郭伯良. 多层线性模型应用[M]. 教育科学出版社, 2005年. [19] Kreft, I. & Leeuw, J.著, 邱皓政译. 多层次模型分析导论[M]. 重庆大学出版社, 2007年. [20] George, J. Personality, Affect, and behavior in groups[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1990, 75: 107-116. [21] Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical and statistical consideration[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51:1173-1182. [22] Klein, K. J., F. Dansereau & R. J. Hall. Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis[J].Academy of Management Review, 1994, 19:195-229.