联盟网络特征与组织学习模式转变：一个纵向案例研究

科研管理 ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (8): 126-133.

联盟网络特征与组织学习模式转变：一个纵向案例研究

宋志红¹, 何洋², 李冬梅³

1. 山西大学管理与决策研究所, 山西太原 030006;
2. 山西大学经济与管理学院, 山西太原 030006;
3. 山西大学数学科学学院, 山西太原 030006

收稿日期:2013-08-23 修回日期:2014-04-10 出版日期:2014-08-25 发布日期:2014-08-21
作者简介:宋志红（1977-），男（汉），山西忻州人，副教授，博士，研究方向为企业网络与技术创新。
何洋（1987-），男（汉），河北唐山人，硕士研究生，研究方向为企业网络与技术创新。
李冬梅（1977-），女（汉），山西怀仁人，讲师，博士研究生，研究方向为金融工程与金融网络。
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学研究项目“知识共享、能力差异和企业网络的动态演进”（项目批准号：09YJC630146，2009~2012）；山西省高等学校哲学社会科学研究项目资助“连锁董事网络视角下的上市公司投资行为研究”（项目批准号：2012206，2012~2013）。

Alliance networks’ characteristics and change of organizational learning patterns：A longitudinal case study

Song Zhihong¹, He Yang², Li Dongmei³

1. Institute of Management and Decision, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, Shanxi, China;
2. School of Economics and Management, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, Shanxi, China;
3. School of Mathematical Sciences, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, Shanxi, China

Received:2013-08-23 Revised:2014-04-10 Online:2014-08-25 Published:2014-08-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用基于事件史分析的纵向案例研究方法，以1995~2012年索尼公司建立的联盟网络为对象，考察了联盟网络的四个特征与组织学习模式之间的关系，包括联盟网络类型、资源承诺水平、互动关系持续时间、网络成员的能力类型。研究结果表明，与1995~2004年相比，在2005~2012年，索尼更多采用了股权协议形式，通过提高资源承诺水平、稳定与现有成员的联结关系，搜寻具有同质性能力的网络成员，实现组织学习模式从探索性学习向利用性学习转变。企业管理者可以通过有意识地设计联盟网络组合和联盟网络特征来实现组织学习模式转变。

关键词: 联盟网络, 利用性学习, 探索性学习, 纵向案例研究, 索尼公司

Abstract: Applying a longitudinal case study method based on event history analysis, the paper takes Sony's alliance networks between 1995 and 2012 as the case and investigates the relationship between four characteristics of alliance networks and organizational learning patterns, including the types of alliance networks, the level of resource commitment, duration of interactive relationships, and types of network partner capabilities. The research results show that, compared with 1995~2004, Sony managed to transform from less explorative learning to more exploitive learning during the period of 2005~2012 by concluding relatively more equity agreements, increasing the level of resource commitment, strengthening the tieswith its existing partners, and searching for network partners with homogeneous capabilities.The results of case study imply that managers can achieve the change of organizational learning patterns by deliberately designing the alliance network portfolio and alliance networks' characteristics.

Key words: alliance networks, exploitive learning, explorative learning, longitudinal case study, Sony Corporation

中图分类号:

C935
F273.7

宋志红, 何洋, 李冬梅. 联盟网络特征与组织学习模式转变：一个纵向案例研究[J]. 科研管理, 2014, 35(8): 126-133.

Song Zhihong, He Yang, Li Dongmei. Alliance networks’ characteristics and change of organizational learning patterns：A longitudinal case study[J]. Science Research Management, 2014, 35(8): 126-133.

参考文献

[1] Hagedoorn, J. Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences[J]. Strategic Management Journal.1993, 14(5): 371-385. [2] Heimeriks, K., Duysters, G. Alliance capability as a mediator between experience and alliance performance: An empirical investigation into the alliance capability development process[J]. Journal of Management Studies. 2007, 44(1):25-49. [3] Afuah, A. How much do your co-opetitors' capabilities matter in the face of technological change[J]? Strategic Management Journal. 2000, 21(3):387-404. [4] Grant, R. and Baden-Fuller, C. A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances[J]. Journal of Management Studies.2004(41): 61-84. [5] 李垣, 陈浩然, 赵文红. 组织间学习、控制方式与自主创新关系研究—基于两种技术差异情景的比较分析[J]. 科学学研究, 2008(2):199-204. [6] Tsai,W. Knowledge transfer in intra-organizational networks: effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal. 2001, 44(5): 996-1004. [7] 潘松挺, 郑亚莉. 网络关系强度与企业技术创新绩效—基于探索式学习和利用式学习的实证研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2011(11): 1736-1743. [8] Lavie, D. and Rosenkopf, L. Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation[J]. Academy of Management Journal.2006, 49(4): 797-818. [9] Huber, G.,Organizational learning: The contribution processes and the literatures[J]. Organization Science. 1991, 2(1): 88-115. [10] March,J. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning[J].Organization Science.1991,2(1):71-87. [11] Dittrich,K., Duysters,G., Ard-Pieter de Man. Strategic repositioning by means of alliance networks: the case of IBM[J]. Research Policy. 2007(36): 1496-1511. [12] Gupta,A.K., Smith, K.G., Shalley, C.E. The interplay between exploration and exploitation[J]. Academy of Management Journal. 2006, 49(4): 693-706 [13] 彭新敏. 企业网络与利用性－探索性学习的关系研究:基于创新视角[J].科研管理, 2011(3):15-22. [14] Granovetter, M.S.The strength of weak ties[J]. American Journal of Sociology. 1973, 78(6):1360-1380. [15] Duysters, G and Ard-Pieter de Man. Collaboration and innovation: A review of the effects of mergers, acquisitions and alliances on innovation[J].Technovation. 2005 (25): 1377-1387. [16] Rowley, T., Behrens, D. and Krackhardt, D. Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries[J]. Strategic Management Journal. 2000(21):369-386. [17] 蔡宁, 潘松挺. 网络关系强度与企业技术创新模式的耦合性及其协同演化: 以海正药业技术创新网络为例[J]. 中国工业经济,2008(4):137-144. [18] Brass, D. J., K. D. Butterfield, and B. C. Skaggs. Relationships and unethical behavior: A social network perspective[J]. Academy of Management Review. 1998, 23 (1): 14-21. [19] Koza MP, Lewin AY. The co-evolution of strategic alliances[J]. Organization Science.1998, 9(3): 255-264. [20] Levitt B, March J.G. Organizational learning[J]. Annual Review of Sociology.1988(14): 319-340. [21] 宋志红, 李常洪, 李冬梅. 技术联盟网络与知识管理动机的匹配性 [J]. 科学学研究,2013(1):104-114.