科研管理 ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (7): 75-83.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

我国不同所有制企业技术创新能力的行业比较

李长青1, 周伟铎2, 姚星1   

  1. 1. 西南财经大学国际商学院, 四川 成都 611130;
    2. 山东师范大学人口·资源与环境学院, 山东 济南 250014
  • 收稿日期:2013-10-03 修回日期:2014-05-07 出版日期:2014-07-25 发布日期:2014-07-15
  • 作者简介:李长青(1983-),男,河南项城人,博士,讲师,研究方向为技术经济与贸易发展。
    周伟铎(1988-),男,河南许昌人,硕士研究生,研究方向为资源与环境经济学。
    姚星(1982-),男,云南曲靖人,博士,副教授,研究方向为技术服务贸易。
  • 基金资助:

    四川省哲学社会科学青年项目(SC13C006);四川省软科学研究计划项目(2013ZR0035);四川省高校科研创新团队(JBK130504);西南财经大学“中央高校基本科研业务费”(JBK120403)。

An evaluation of technological innovation capability of different ownership enterprises from the industry level

Li Changqing1, Zhou Weiduo2, Yao Xing1   

  1. 1. School of International Business, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, China;
    2. Population, Resource and Environment College, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, Shandong, China
  • Received:2013-10-03 Revised:2014-05-07 Online:2014-07-25 Published:2014-07-15

摘要: 利用微观企业数据,通过技术创新的投入指标、产出指标、效率指标和基于DEA的Maluquist生产率分解指标,对我国不同所有制企业的技术创新能力进行分行业测度。研究发现:(1)私营企业在大多数行业中的技术创新投入和产出处于优势;国有企业在垄断竞争行业的研发投入和产出相对较多,但在竞争性行业却很少;外资企业和港澳台企业的技术创新投入和产出刚好与国有企业相反。(2)港澳台企业、集体企业、外资企业和私营企业在竞争性行业的创新效率远高于国有企业,不同所有制企业在垄断竞争行业中的创新效率差异不明显。(3)竞争性行业中公有制企业“技术追赶”效应略好于非公有制企业,“技术创新”效应略逊于非公有制企业;在垄断竞争行业在公有制企业和非公有制企业的“技术追赶”效应和“技术创新”效应的差异不明显。

关键词: 企业性质, Maluquist指数, 技术追赶, 技术创新

Abstract: Based on Chinese industrial enterprises statistics database, using technical innovation's input indicators, output indicators, efficiency indicators and indicators of decomposition Maluquist productivity to compare technological innovative capability of enterprises of different ownership. The results show that (1) Private enterprise have a leading position in inputs and outputs of technological innovation respects; state-owned enterprises have more R&D investment and output in monopolistically competitive industry and less in the competitive industry, while foreign and Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan enterprises' R&D inputs and outputs are just the opposite of state-owned enterprises. (2) Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan enterprises, collective enterprises, foreign-funded enterprises and private enterprises have more efficiency than state-owned enterprises in a competitive industry, but there is no big difference among different ownership. And (3) State-owned and collective enterprises' technology catch-up effect is slightly better than the other type's enterprises in competitive industry, and "technological innovation" effect of slightly inferior to other enterprises. In monopolistically competitive industry, different ownership enterprises have no significant difference in these two kinds of effect.

Key words: ownership, maluquist index, technological catch-up, technological innovation

中图分类号: