在联盟含内、外收益的支付结构下，根据动态博弈理论分析了企业的行为策略，研究了市场环境、管理成本和联盟过程对企业行为与治理机制的影响。研究结果表明：基于知识交易的未来预期和既往经历影响企业的行为决策，而行为决策决定了联盟收益及其演变轨迹。因而，当知识保护的成本增加时，建立知识保护机制的可能性降低，分享知识的时机可能提前。当协调成本增加时，进行关系协调并获取联盟内收益的可能性降低，退出联盟的时机可能提前。作为知识分享收益的决定因素，市场环境和分享机制的管理成本将影响联盟过程中的各项行为和治理决策。同时，在知识交易过程中保持知识收支平衡十分关键，若知识收支严重失衡，将导致联盟失败并给分享自有知识的企业造成损失。
Abstract
Given the payoff structure containing the internal and external benefits of alliance, this paper analyzes the firms' behavior strategies, investigates the influence of marketing environment, management cost, and the alliance experience on the firm's behavior and governance mechanisms, by leveraging dynamic game theory. The research results indicate that the future expectation and the past experience of knowledge exchanging have a significant impact on the behavior strategies of the alliance participants, and the strategies determine the benefits and evolvement of the corresponding alliance. Therefore, when the management cost of knowledge protection increases, the participants are likely to abandon the protection mechanism and speed up sharing knowledge. When the coordination cost grows, the participants are more likely to abandon the coordination mechanism and speed up exiting the alliance. As the determinant of knowledge sharing benefits, the marketing environment and the management cost of knowledge sharing have influence on every behavior decision and governance mechanism choice in the process of alliance. Furthermore, it is important to maintain the symmetrical knowledge payoff between the two participants of the alliance. Otherwise, it would result in a loss of the firm that transfers knowledge and incur a failure of the alliance.
关键词
知识交易 /
管理成本 /
行为 /
治理机制
Key words
knowledge exchange /
management cost /
behavior /
governance mechanism
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 谢洪明,陈盈,程聪.网络强度和企业管理创新:社会资本的影响[J].科研管理,2012,33(9):32-39.
[2] 张晓东,朱敏.激励、同事态度和个人文化对知识共享的影响[J].科研管理,2012,33(10):97-105.
[3] 马亚男,李慧.知识联盟组织间知识共享不足风险形成过程研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008(1):93-97.
[4] 祁红梅,黄瑞华.动态联盟形成阶段知识产权冲突及激励对策研究[J].研究与发展管理,2004(8):70-76.
[5] 龚毅,谢恩.中外企业战略联盟知识转移效率的实证分析[J].科学学研究,2005,23(4):500-505.
[6] 李瑶,刘益,杨伟.不同治理机制对联盟中显性知识和隐性知识转移的影响研究[J].情报杂志,2010,29(11):106-109.
[7] Reuer,J.,Ariño,A.Contractual renegotiations in strategic alliances[J].Journal of Management,2002,28(1):47-68.
[8] Kale,Prashant,Singh,Harbir,Perlmutter,Howard.Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliance:Building relational capital[J].Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(3):217-237.
[9] Argyres,Nicholas S.,Janet Bercovitz,Kyle J.Mayer.Complementarity and evolution of contractual provisions:An empirical study of it services contracts[J].Organization Science,2007,18(1):3-19.
[10] Gulati,Ranjay,Jack A.Nickerson.Interorganizational trust,governance choice, and exchange performance[J].Organization Science,2008,19(5):688-708.
[11] 吴绍波,顾新.知识链组织之间合作与冲突的稳定性结构研究[J].南开管理评论,2009,12(3)54-58.
[12] 张宝生,张庆普,王晓红.知识网络成员合作行为策略选择研究[J].科研管理,2012,33(11):144-151.
[13] Khanna,T.,R.Gulati,N.Nohria.The dynamics of learning alliances:Competition,cooperation,and relative scope[J].Strategic Management Journal,1998,19(3)193-210.
[14] Das,TK,Teng B.Strategic alliance constellations:a social exchange perspective[J].Academy of Management Review,2002,27(3):445-456.
[15] De Rond,M.,Bouchikhi,H.On the dialectics of strategic alliances[J].Organization Science,200415(1):56-69.
[16] Ness,Hvard.Governance, negotiations,and alliance dynamics:Explaining the evolution of relational practice[J].Journal of Management Studies,2009,46(3) 451-480.
基金
国家自然科学基金重大项目（71090403），广东省哲学社会科学规划项目（GD11YGL07），中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目（2014ZDXMPY02，D2118120）。
PDF(1 KB)
