财政补贴政策对企业研发投入的门槛效应

科研管理 ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6): 68-76.

财政补贴政策对企业研发投入的门槛效应

戴小勇, 成力为

大连理工大学管理与经济学部, 辽宁大连 116024

收稿日期:2012-08-13 修回日期:2013-07-24 出版日期:2014-06-25 发布日期:2014-06-23
作者简介:戴小勇（1987- ），男（汉），湖南邵阳人，大连理工大学管理与经济学部博士研究生，主要研究方向：金融发展、技术创新与管理。
成力为（1960- ），女（汉），湖南津市人，大连理工大学教授，博士生导师，主要研究方向：国际金融理论与政策。
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学基金项目“金融低效下的企业异质性投资行为与外部失衡：形成机理及调整政策研究”（批准号：11YJA790016；起止时间：2011.12-2014.12）；辽宁省社科联项目“推动辽宁科技与金融结合问题研究”（批准号：2013lsldykt19；起止时间：2013.01-2013.09）；国家自然科学基金重点项目“PORC框架下的国家自主创新体系国际化理论与政策研究”（批准号：71033002；起止时间：2011.01-2014.12）；国家自然科学基金项目“外部治理环境、利益相关者声誉与上市公司盈余管理”（批准号：71172136；起止时间：2012.01-2015.12）。

The threshold effects of fiscal subsidy policy on corporate R&D investment

Dai Xiaoyong, Cheng Liwei

Faculty of Management and Economics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, Liaoning, China

Received:2012-08-13 Revised:2013-07-24 Online:2014-06-25 Published:2014-06-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 使用我国2005-2007年约30万家工业企业数据，描述性统计得到：第一，单个企业受财政补贴的额度呈下降趋势，企业研发投入的资金来源中自筹资金比例上升；第二，财政补贴与企业研发投入分布存在较大的行业差异；第三，财政补贴严重向国有企业倾斜，国有企业是我国研发投入的主力军。虽然财政补贴在总体上能够促进企业研发投入，但门槛面板数据模型的估计结果表明：财政补贴与企业研发投入呈现复杂的非线性关系；对于制造业国有企业，财政补贴占企业研发投入的最佳比例是13.45%~27.75%，在此区间财政补贴显著带动企业研发投入，具有挤入效应，超过27.75%时对企业研发投入显著负向影响、挤出效应明显；但对私营企业、特别是私营高科技企业，财政补贴只有挤入效应、没有挤出效应。因此，提高财政补贴效率、促进企业自主研发的关键是，确立技术发明公共性补偿或风险补偿的合理定价机制，确保私营企业、特别是私营高科技企业得到合理的补偿。

关键词: 财政补贴, 研发投入, 分布特征, 门槛效应

Abstract: Using 30,0000 industrial enterprises' panel data from 2005 to 2007 in China, the descriptive statistics brought the following conclusions. Firstly, individual firm's internal self-raised fund gradually becomes the main source of R&D expenditure with decreasing fiscal subsidies. Secondly, the distribution of fiscal subsidies and enterprises' R&D investment vary from industries. Thirdly, State-owned enterprises account for the largest proportion of R&D expenditure and benefit most from fiscal subsidies. Though fiscal subsidies can stimulate the firms' R&D, estimation of threshold panel data model shows that the relationship between fiscal subsidies and firm R&D is non-linear. The optional ration of fiscal subsidies to firm R&D investment ranges from 13.45% to 27.75% for SOEs in manufacturing industries. Fiscal subsidies have a crowding-in effect on firm R&D investment in that interval, but exhibit a crowding-out effect when that ration exceeds 27.75%. There is only crowding-in but no crowding-out effect for privately-owned firms, especially high-tech privately firms. The threshold value to trigger crowing-out effect is larger in manufacturing industries than high-tech industries. Therefore, the key to promote the efficiency of fiscal subsidies and stimulate firm R&D investment is to properly price the compensation rate of R&D investment, and strength the support to privately-owned firms, especially firms in high-tech industries.

Key words: fiscal subsidies, R&D investment, distribution features, threshold effects

中图分类号:

戴小勇, 成力为. 财政补贴政策对企业研发投入的门槛效应[J]. 科研管理, 2014, 35(6): 68-76.

Dai Xiaoyong, Cheng Liwei. The threshold effects of fiscal subsidy policy on corporate R&D investment[J]. Science Research Management, 2014, 35(6): 68-76.

参考文献

[1] David M L,Terleckyj N E.Effects of Government R&D on Private R&D Investment and Productivity:A Macroeconomic Analysis[J].The Bell Journal of Economics,1983(2),551-561. [2] Levin R,Reiss PC.Tests of a Schumpeterian model of R&D and market structure[M].R &D,Patents,and Productivity.University of Chicago Press.1984:175-208. [3] Czarnitzki D,Hussinger K.The Link between R&D Subsidies,R&D Input and Technological Performance [R].ZEW Discussion Paper,2004,04-56. [4] Binelli C,Maffioli A.A micro-econometric analysis of public support to private R&D in Argentina[J].International Review of Applied Economics,2007 (3):339-59. [5] Gonzalez X,Pazo C.Do public subsidies stimulate private R&D spending?[J].Research Policy,2008 (3):371-389. [6] Carboni O A.R&D subsidies and private R&D expenditures:evidence from Italian manufacturing data[J].International Review of Applied Economics,2011 (4):419-39. [7] 程华,赵祥.企业规模、研发强度、资助强度与政府科技资助的绩效关系研究——基于浙江民营科技企业的实证研究[J].科研管理,2008 (2):37-43. [8] 李平,王春晖.政府科技资助对企业技术创新的非线性研究——基于中国2001-2008年省级面板数据的门槛回归分析[J].中国软科学,2010 (8):138-147. [9] 王俊.R&D补贴对企业R&D投入及创新产出影响的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2010 (9):1368-1374. [10] 江静.公共政策对企业创新支持的绩效——基于直接补贴与税收优惠的比较分析[J].科研管理,2011 (4):1-8. [11] Toivanen O,Petri N.Investment,R&D,Subsidies,and Credit Constraints [R].Department of Economics MIT,Working Paper,2000. [12] Klette T J,Moen J,Griliches Z.Do subsidies to commercial R&D reduce market failures? Microeconometric evaluation studies[J].Research Policy,2000 (4):471-495. [13] David P A,Hall B H,Toole A A.Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence[J].Research Policy,2000 (4):497-529. [14] Lach S.Do R&D subsidies stimulate or displace private R&D? Evidence from Israel[J].Journal of Industrial Economics,2002 (4):369-390. [15] Gorg H,Strobl E.The effect of R&D subsidies on private R&D[J].Economica,2007 (294):215-234. [16] Lee C-Y.The differential effects of public R&D support on firm R&D:Theory and evidence from multi-country data[J].Technovation,2011 (5-6):256-269. [17] 成力为,戴小勇.研发投入分布特征与研发投资强度影响因素的分析——基于我国30万个工业企业面板数据[J].中国软科学,2012(8):152-165. [18] Hansen BE.Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels:Estimation,testing,and inference[J].Journal of Econometrics,1999,93(2):345-68.