管理会计与控制技术、核心能力建设与企业业绩&mdash;基于中国施工企业293个工程项目的调查分析

毛洪涛; 周彦; 任旭林; 张正勇

科研管理 ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2) : 70-78.

论文

管理会计与控制技术、核心能力建设与企业业绩—基于中国施工企业293个工程项目的调查分析

毛洪涛¹, 周彦¹, 任旭林², 张正勇³

作者信息 +

Management accounting and controls, core competence development and firm performance：A survey based on 293 construction projects of Chinese construction firms

Mao Hongtao¹, Zhou Yan¹, Ren Xulin², Zhang Zhengyong³

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

近年来，国内管理会计与控制技术（MACs）正在企业不断深入推广，但鲜有研究关注MACs实施的作用和效果，本文在293个工程项目问卷调查的基础上，运用结构方程模型分析了现代MACs在企业中的业绩作用和影响机理。研究发现：MACs的运用能直接提升企业财务业绩，并通过核心能力建设间接影响企业财务业绩。MACs在其运用过程中，加强企业核心能力，并通过核心能力的整合为企业带来持续的竞争优势。研究进一步发现，MACs对核心能力及业绩的作用受到控制技术成熟度的影响，控制技术实施越成熟，对核心能力及业绩的影响越明显。鉴于此，本文研究对于正确认识、选择和实施MACs具有重要指导意义。

Abstract

Management accounting and controls (MACs) have being applied more frequently and broadly in Chinese firms in recent years. However, little literature studies the effectiveness of MACs. We conduct a survey of 293 construction projects and adopt the structural equation model to analyze the influence of MACs on firm performance. We find that application of MACs can directly improve firms' financial performance and indirectly affect financial performance through the development of firms' core competence. In its application process, MACs improve firms' core competence and bring sustainable competitiveness through the integration of core competence. Further, we find that the development level of MACs affects their influence on core competence and firm performance. The more developed MACs are, the more obvious the influence on firm performance is. Therefore, this paper provides guidance for understanding, choosing and implementing MACs.

导出引用

毛洪涛, 周彦, 任旭林, 张正勇. 管理会计与控制技术、核心能力建设与企业业绩—基于中国施工企业293个工程项目的调查分析[J]. 科研管理. 2014, 35(2): 70-78

Mao Hongtao, Zhou Yan, Ren Xulin, Zhang Zhengyong. Management accounting and controls, core competence development and firm performance：A survey based on 293 construction projects of Chinese construction firms[J]. Science Research Management. 2014, 35(2): 70-78

中图分类号： F234.3

参考文献

[1] 南京大学会计系课题组. 中国企业成本管理方法及其效果的调查分析[J]. 会计研究, 2001(7):46-55. [2] 熊焰韧, 苏文兵. 管理会计实践发展现状与展望——现金管理会计方法在中国应用状况调查[J]. 会计研究, 2008(11):84-90. [3] 杜荣瑞, 肖泽忠, 周齐武, 赵立新. 管理会计与控制技术的应用及其与公司业绩的关系[J]. 会计研究, 2008(9):39-45. [4] Cagwin, D., Bouwman, M.J. The association between activity-based costing and improvement in financial performance[J]. Management Accounting Research. 2002, 13:1-39. [5] Gordon, L.A., Silvester, K.J. Stock market reactions to activity-based costing adoptions[J]. Journal of Accounting and Public Polic. 1999, 18:229-251. [6] 肖泽忠, 杜荣瑞, 周齐武. 试探信息技术与管理会计和控制的互补性及其业绩影响[J]. 管理世界, 2009(4):143-152. [7] 王毅, 陈劲, 许庆瑞. 企业核心能力:理论溯源与逻辑结构剖析[J]. 管理科学学报, 2000, 3(3):24-32. [8] 魏江. 企业核心能力的内涵与本质[J]. 管理工程学报, 1999(1):53-56. [9] Wernerfelt, B. A resource-based view of the firm[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1984, 2(5):171-180. [10] 石炳华. 论战略管理会计与企业核心竞争力[J]. 经济与管理, 2007, 6(21):80-84. [11] 谢洪明, 王成, 葛志良. 核心能力:组织文化和组织学习作用[J]. 南开管理评论, 2006, 9(4):104-110. [12] Leonard-Barton, D. Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development[J]. Strategy Management Journal. 1992, 6:111-125. [13] Klein, J., Gee, D., Jones, H. Analysing clusters of skills in R&D-core competencies, metaphors, visualization, and the role of IT[J]. R&D Management. 1998, 1:37-42. [14] Prahalad, C.K., Hamel, G. The Core Competence of the Corporation[J]. Harvard Business Review. 1990, 5-6:79-90. [15] Henri, J.F. Management control systems and strategy: A resource-based perspective[J]. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 2006, 31(6):529-558. [16] Lee, Y., Cavusgil, S.T. Enhancing alliance performance: the effects of contractual-based versus relational-based governance[J]. Journal of Business Research. 2006, 59(8):896-905. [17] Williams, J.J., Seaman, A.E. Management accounting systems change and departmental performance: the influence of managerial information and task uncertainty[J]. Management Accounting Research. 2002, 13:419-445. [18] Baaij, M., Greeven, M., Dalen, J.V. Persistent Superior Economic Performance, Sustainable Competitive Advantage, and Schumpeterian Innovation: Leading Established Computer Firms, 1954 2000[J]. European Management Journal. 2004, 10:517-531. [19] Meyer, M.H., Utterback, J.M. The Product Family and the Dynamics of Core Capability[J]. The International Center for Research on the Management of Technology. 1992, 12:77-92. [20] Duystersa, G., Hagedoorn, J. Core competences and company performance in the world-wide computer industry[J]. The Journal of High Technology Management Research. 2000, 1(1):75-91. [21] Lee, C., Lee, K., Pennings, J.M. Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: a study on technology‐based ventures[J]. Strategic Management Journal. 2001, 6:615-640. [22] Ittner, C.D., Larcker, D.F. Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting: a value-based management perspective[J]. Journal of accounting and economics. 2001, 12:349-410. [23] 文东华, 潘飞, 陈世敏. 环境不确定性、二元管理控制系统与企业业绩实证研究——基于权变理论的视角[J]. 管理世界, 2009(10):102-114. [24] Baines, A., Langfield-Smith, K. Antecedents to management accounting change: a structural equation approach[J]. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 2003, 28(7-8):675-698. [25] Anderson, S.W., Young, S.M. The impact of contextual and process factors on the evaluation of activity-based costing systems[J]. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 1999, 24:525-559. [26] Mahama, H. Management control systems, cooperation and performance in strategic supply relationships: A survey in the mines[J]. Management Accounting Research. 2006, 17:315 339. [27] O'Connor, N.G., Deng, J., Luo, Y. Political constraints, organization design and performance measurement in China's state-owned enterprises[J]. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 2006, 31:157-177.