角色采择和领导-成员关系对团队绩效的影响

科研管理 ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 62-69.

角色采择和领导-成员关系对团队绩效的影响

井润田, 胡思瑶

电子科技大学经济与管理学院, 四川成都 610054

收稿日期:2012-03-13 修回日期:2013-03-11 出版日期:2014-02-25 发布日期:2014-03-10
作者简介:井润田（1971- ），男，陕西蒲城人，电子科技大学经济与管理学院教授，研究方向：组织变革、领导行为。
胡思瑶（1988- ），女，四川成都人，电子科技大学经济与管理学院硕士生，研究方向：领导行为、团队管理等。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（70872017 & 71102053）。

Impacts of role-taking and leader-member relationshipupon team performance

Jing Runtian, Hu Siyao

School of Management and Economics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054, Sichuan, China

Received:2012-03-13 Revised:2013-03-11 Online:2014-02-25 Published:2014-03-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文将科研团队领导者与成员的情感交换作为重点，研究领导者角色采择能力对领导-成员关系的影响作用，以及两者共同对团队绩效的影响机制。研究对全国6所高校的150个科研团队进行了配对问卷调查，获得97份领导问卷和402份成员问卷，分析过程基于团队层面数据并采用结构方程模型进行假设检验。分析结果表明：团队领导的角色采择和领导获得的专业尊重会显著影响成员与领导之间的情感交换；团队士气在成员情感交换和团队绩效之间具有中介效应；团队归属感的中介效应不明显。以上结论有助于从领导者情感能力角度完善领导-成员关系方面的现有研究，并对于提高科研团队管理水平具有重要的现实指导价值。

关键词: 角色采择, 领导-成员关系, 团队士气, 团队绩效, 科研团队

Abstract: Focusing on the affective exchange relationship between leaders and members in research teams, this study examines the impact of leader's role-taking capability upon the leader-member exchange relationship and the influencing mechanism of the above two factors on team performance. Paired questionnaire surveys from 150 research teams in 6 Chinese universities are conducted, with returned questionnaires from 97 team leaders and 402 team members. Based on the team-level data, the structural equation modeling method is employed to test the hypotheses. The results show that: Team leader's role-taking and professional respect have significant impacts on affective exchange between leader and members; Team members' morale plays a mediating role between affective exchange and team performance; and the mediating effect of the sense of belonging is insignificant. The above conclusions would benefit our understandings of leader-member exchange from the view of emotional capability of team leaders, which can provide important practical guiding values in improving the managerial skills of research teams.

Key words: role-taking, leader-member exchange relationship, team morale, team performance, research team

中图分类号:

F272.91

井润田, 胡思瑶. 角色采择和领导-成员关系对团队绩效的影响[J]. 科研管理, 2014, 35(2): 62-69.

Jing Runtian, Hu Siyao. Impacts of role-taking and leader-member relationshipupon team performance[J]. Science Research Management, 2014, 35(2): 62-69.

参考文献

[1] Abbey, A. JW Dickson. R&D work climate and innovation in semiconductors[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1983, 26(2): 362-368. [2] 顾仰洁, 田新民, 李宁.团队氛围影响下信息异质性与团队士气关系研究[J].上海管理科学, 2008, 30(2): 47-50. [3] Pirola-Merlo, A., C. Hartel. How leaders influence the impact of affective events on team climate and performance in R&D teams[J]. Leadership Quarterly, 2002, 13(5): 561-581. [4] 吴志明, 武欣. 高科技团队变革型领导、组织公民行为和团队绩效关系的实证研究[J]. 科研管理, 2006, 27(6): 74-79. [5] 陈启愉, 张凌, 付晔. 科研团队管理的经济学分析[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2008, 20(1): 132-134. [6] Dulebohn JH, Bommer WH, Liden RC, Brouer RL, Ferris GR. A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future[J]. Journal of Management, 2012, doi: 10.1177/0149206311415280. [7] Wayne SJ, Shore LM, Bommer WH, Tetrick LE. The role of fair treatment and rewards in perceptions of organizational support and leader-member exchange[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2002, 87(3): 590-598. [8] West MA, Farr JL. Innovations at work: Psychological perspectives[J]. Social Behavior, 1989, 4: 15-30. [9] Mead, G.H. Mind, self and society[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1934. [10] Weick K. The social psychology of organizing (2nd Ed.)[M]. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1979 [11] Stephan, W.G., Finlay, K. The role of empathy in improving intergroup relations[J]. Journal of Social Issues, 1999, 55(4): 729-743. [12] 连淑芳, 杨治良.观点采择对内隐刻板印象的影响研究[J]. 心理学探新, 2009, 29(6): 75-78. [13] Forgas JP. Mood, judgment: the Affect Infusion Model[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1995, 117(1): 39-66. [14] Isen, A.M., Baron, R.A. Positive affect as a factor in organizational behavior[J].Research In Organizational Behavior, 1991, l13: 1-53. [15] McCall, MW, Jr.. Leadership and the professional[M]. In R. Katz (ed.), Managing Professionals in Innovative Organizations: A Collection of Readings: 148-161. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 1988. [16] Farris GH. Technical leadership: much discussed but little understood[J]. Research Technology Management, 1988, 31(2): 12-17. [17] Dvir T, Eden D, Banjo ML. Self-fulfilling prophecy and gender: Can women be Pygmalion and Galatea?[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1995, 80(2): 253-270. [18] Bain, PG, L.Mann, A. PirolaI-Merlo. The Innovation imperative: the relationships between team climate, innovation, and performance in research and development teams[J]. Small Group Research, 2001, 32(1): 55-73. [19] Wilson-Evered E, Hartel CEJ, Neale MA. Longitudinal study of work group innovation: the importance of transformational leadership and morale[J]. Advances in Health Care Management, 2001, 2: 315-340. [20] Evans CR, Dion KL. Group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis[J]. Small Group Research, 1991, 22(2): 175-186. [21] Mullen B, Copper C. The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1994, 115(2): 210-227. [22] Berlew DE. Leadership and organizational excitement[J]. California Management Review, 1974, 17(2): 21-30. [23] Shamir, B., Zakay, E., Brenin, E., Popper, M. Correlates of charismatic leader behavior in military units: subordinates' attitudes, unit of characteristics, and superiors' appraisals of leader performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1998, 41(4), 387-401. [24] 凌文辁、张治灿、方俐洛. 中国职工组织承诺的结构模型研究[J]. 管理科学学报, 2000, 3(2): 76-81. [25] Back KW. Influence through social communication[J]. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1951, 46(1): 9-23. [26] Orwell G. Animal farm[M]. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1946. [27] Festinger L, Schachter S, Back K. Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing[M]. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 1950. [28] Boyacigiller, Adler NJ.The parochial dinosaur: Organizational science in a global context[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1991, 16(2): 62-92. [29] Davis M H. The effects of dispositional empathy on emotional reactions and helping: A multidimensional approach[J]. Journal of Personality, 1983, 51(2): 167-184. [30] Liden Robert C, John M Maslyn. Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development[J]. Journal of management, 1998, 24(1): 43-72. [31] Hackman JR. The design of work teams[M]. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior: 315-342. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1987. [32] Chan, David. Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1998, 83(2): 234-246. [33] Barczak G, Wilemon D. Leadership difference in new product development teams[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1989, 6(4): 259-267. [34] McNatt DB. Ancient Pygmalion joins contemporary management: A meta-analysis of the result[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000, 85(2): 314-322. [35] Mullen B, Baumeister R F. Group effects on self-attention and performance: Social loafing, social facilitation, and social impairment[J]. Review of personality and social psychology, 1987, 9: 189-206. [36] Festinger L, Schachter S, Back K. Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing[M]. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1950.