团队知识转移风险对知识转移绩效的作用路径研究——知识网络的中介作用和团队共享心智模式的调节作用

科研管理 ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 127-135.

团队知识转移风险对知识转移绩效的作用路径研究——知识网络的中介作用和团队共享心智模式的调节作用

李柏洲, 徐广玉, 苏屹

哈尔滨工程大学企业创新研究所, 黑龙江哈尔滨 150001

收稿日期:2012-07-12 修回日期:2012-12-09 出版日期:2014-02-25 发布日期:2014-03-10
作者简介:李柏洲（1964- ），男（汉），辽宁彰武人，哈尔滨工程大学经济管理学院教授，博士生导师，研究方向：知识管理与创新管理。
徐广玉（1988- ），女（汉），黑龙江哈尔滨人，哈尔滨工程大学经济管理学院博士生，研究方向：知识管理与创新管理。
苏屹（1983- ），男（汉），黑龙江哈尔滨人，哈尔滨工程大学经济管理学院讲师，博士后，研究方向：知识管理与创新管理。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（71073034，2011.01-2013.12）；国家软科学项目（2012GXS4D114，2013.01-2013.12）；中国博士后资助项目（2012M520712，2012.11-2013.06）；黑龙江省科技攻关计划资助项目（GZ11D203，2012.01-2012.12）；黑龙江省博士后资助项目（LBH-Z11186，2012.01-2013.06）。

Research on function paths of team knowledge transfer risk on knowledge transfer performance：Mediating effects of knowledge network and moderating effects of team shared mental models

Li Baizhou, Xu Guangyu, Su Yi

The Enterprise Innovation Institute, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, Heilongjiang, China

Received:2012-07-12 Revised:2012-12-09 Online:2014-02-25 Published:2014-03-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 构建团队知识转移风险、知识网络、知识转移绩效及团队共享心智模式的理论分析框架。使用结构方程和层次回归分析法对已构建理论分析框架进行实证分析，实证结果表明：团队知识转移风险与知识转移绩效间显著负相关；知识网络是团队知识转移风险与知识转移绩效的中介变量；团队共享心智模式正向调节团队知识转移风险、知识网络与知识转移绩效间的关系。研究将对降低团队知识转移风险，提升知识转移绩效有所裨益。

关键词: 团队知识转移风险, 知识网络, 团队共享心智模式, 知识转移绩效

Abstract: This paper constructs the theoretical analysis framework of relationships among team knowledge transfer risk, knowledge network, knowledge transfer performance and sharedmental models. TheSEM and hierarchical regression analysis was adopted to carry out empirical analysis of the established theoretical analysis framework, the results show thatthere exists significantly negative relationships between team knowledge transfer risk and knowledge transfer performance, knowledge networkacts as a mediating variable between team knowledge transfer risk and knowledge transfer performance, while teamsharedmental models positively regulate relationships among team knowledge transfer risk, knowledge network and knowledge transfer performance. Research will be beneficial to reducingteam knowledge transfer risk and promoting knowledge transfer performance.

Key words: team knowledge transfer risk, knowledge network, teamsharedmental models, knowledge transfer performance

中图分类号:

F273.1

李柏洲, 徐广玉, 苏屹. 团队知识转移风险对知识转移绩效的作用路径研究——知识网络的中介作用和团队共享心智模式的调节作用[J]. 科研管理, 2014, 35(2): 127-135.

Li Baizhou, Xu Guangyu, Su Yi. Research on function paths of team knowledge transfer risk on knowledge transfer performance：Mediating effects of knowledge network and moderating effects of team shared mental models[J]. Science Research Management, 2014, 35(2): 127-135.

参考文献

[1] Nonaka I, Konno N.The Concept of Ba:Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation[J].California Management Review, 1998, 40(3):40-54. [2] 曲刚, 李伯森.团队社会资本与知识转移关系的实证研究:交互记忆系统的中介作用[J].管理评论, 2011, 23(9):109-118. [3] Simonin B L.Transfer of Marketing Know-how in International Strategic Alliances:an Empirical Investigation of the Role and an Tecedents of Knowledge Ambiguity[J].Journal of International Business Studies, 1999, 30(3):463-490. [4] 魏江, 王铜安.个体、群组、组织间知识转移影响因素的实证研究[J].科学学研究, 2006, 24(1):91-97. [5] 李炳秀, 李明生.供应链企业间知识转移之风险作用路径实证研究[J].系统工程, 2011, 29(9):41-48. [6] 顾基发, 高飞.从管理科学角度谈物理-事理-人理系统方法论[J].系统工程理论与实践, 1998(8):1-5. [7] Badaracco J L.Alliances Speed Knowledge Transfer[J].Planning Review, 1991(19):10-16. [8] Kogut B, Zander U.Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology[J].Organization Science, 1992, 3(3):383-397. [9] Sneds R, Boer H.Continuous Innovation and Learning in Industrial Organizations[J].Knowledge and Process Management, 2004, 11(4):225-227. [10] 王晓娟.知识网络与集群企业竞争优势研究[D].浙江:浙江大学博士学位论文, 2007. [11] McEvily B, Zaheer A.Bridging Ties:A Source of Firm Heterogeneity in Competitive Capabilities[J].Strategic Management Journal, 1999, 20(12):1133-1156. [12] Tsai W, Ghoshal S.Social Capital and Value Creation:An Empirical Study of Intra-Firm Networks[J].Academy of Management Journal, 1998, 41(4):464-476. [13] Rowley T J, Greve H R, Rao H, etal.Time to Break Up:Social and Instrumental Antecedents of Firm Exits from Exchange Cliques[J].Academy Management Journal, 2005(48):499-520. [14] Rodan S, Galunie C.More Than Network Structure:How Knowledge Heterogeneity Influences Managerial Performance And Innovativeness[J].Strategic Management Journal.2004, 25(6):541-562. [15] Sharda R, Frankwick G L, Turetken O.Group Knowledge Net-works:A Framework and An Implementation[J].Information Systems Frontiers, 1999, 1(3):221-239. [16] Uzzi B.Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks:the Paradox of Embeddedness[J].Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997, 42(1):35-67 [17] Cannon-Bowers J A, Salas E.Reflections on Shared Cognition[J].Journal of Organizational Behavior, 200l, 22(2):195-202. [18] 王黎萤, 陈劲.研发团队创造力的影响机制研究——以团队共享心智模型为中介[J].科学学研究, 2010, 28(3):420-428. [19] Klimoski R, Mohammed S.Team Mental Models:Construct Or Metaphor[J].Journal of Management, 1994, 20:403-437. [20] Hakansson, Snehota.No Business Is in An Island:The Network Concept of Business Strategy[J].Scandinavian Journal of Management, 1989, 5(3):187-200. [21] NahaPiet J.Ghoshal S.Social Capital, Intellectual Capital and the Organizational Advantage[J].Academy of Management Review, 1998, 23(2):242-266. [22] Morgan R M, Hunt, Shelby D.The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing[J].Journal of Marketing, 1994, 58(7):20-38. [23] Moharnrned S, Klimoski R, Rentseh J R.The Measurement of Team Mental Models:We Have No Shared Schema[J].Organizational Research Methods, 2000, 3:123-165. [24] James L R, Demaree R G, Wblf Cx.Estimating within Group Interrater Reliability With and Without Response Bias[J].Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984, 69(1):85-98. [25] Dunlap W P, Burke M J, Smith-Crowe K.Accurate Tests of Statistical Significance for Average Deviation Interrater Agreement Indexes.[J].Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, 88(2), 256-362. [26] 武欣, 吴志明.基于共享心智模型的团队知识管理[J].研究与发展管理, 2006, 18(3):9-15. [27] 龙飞, 戴昌钧.基于组织共享心智模型的组织知识创新战略形成机制分析[J].图书情报工作, 2008, 52(3):70-73. [28] 温忠麟, 侯杰泰, 张雷.调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用[J].心理学报, 2005, 37(2):268-274.