政府补贴、两权分离与企业技术创新

吴剑峰, 杨震宁

科研管理 ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (12) : 54-61.

PDF(1 KB)
PDF(1 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (12) : 54-61.
论文

政府补贴、两权分离与企业技术创新

  • 吴剑峰, 杨震宁
作者信息 +

Government subsidies, separation of ownership and control, and technological innovation

  • Wu Jianfeng, Yang Zhenning
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

技术创新文献对政府补贴究竟是激励效应还是挤出效应尚无定论。本文结合资源基础理论和委托代理理论提出了一个权变的观点,即认为政府补贴能否有效地促进企业的技术创新在很大程度上取决于企业能否处理好两个层面的委托代理关系:一方面是企业管理层和企业股东之间的利益冲突(所有权与管理权的两权分离);另一方面是企业控股股东和中小股东之间的利益冲突(现金流权与控制权的两权分离)。本文对2008-2011年在沪深两市上市的电子、制药和信息企业创新绩效(运用随机效应负二项回归模型)进行分析后发现:第一,企业获得的政府补贴与其技术创新绩效之间不存在显著的正相关关系;第二,企业CEO两职合一、控股股东所有权和控制权的两权分离对政府补贴和技术创新绩效之间的关系起到负向的调节作用。本文的研究结果对政府的研发补贴政策和企业的治理结构调整具有一定的理论指导意义。

Abstract

The literature on technological innovation provides no consensus on the motivation vs. crowding-out effect of government subsidies. This study proposes a contingency perspective on the basis of the resource-based view and principal-agency theory, suggesting that whether government subsidies facilitate technological innovation is dependent upon two principal-agent relationships: the conflict of interests between managers and owners and the conflict of interests between majority shareholders and minority shareholders. By analyzing firms from the electronics, pharmaceutical and information technology between 2008 and 2011, this study finds out that: first, there is no significant and positive relationship between government subsidies and technological innovations; second, CEO duality and the separation of ownership and control rights negatively moderate the relationship between government subsidies and technological innovations. These findings provide important guidance for governmental policies and corporate governance.

关键词

政府补贴 / 两权分离 / 技术创新

Key words

government subsidies / separation of ownership and control / technological innovation

引用本文

导出引用
吴剑峰, 杨震宁. 政府补贴、两权分离与企业技术创新[J]. 科研管理. 2014, 35(12): 54-61
Wu Jianfeng, Yang Zhenning. Government subsidies, separation of ownership and control, and technological innovation[J]. Science Research Management. 2014, 35(12): 54-61
中图分类号: F425   

参考文献

[1] Clausen TH. Do subsidies have positive impacts on R&D and innovation activities at the firm level? [J] Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2009, 20: 239-253. [2] David P, Hall BH, Toole A.A. Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A Review of the Econometric Evidence [J]. Research Policy, 2000, 29: 497-529. [3] Fisher RC. State & local public finance (3rd ed.) [M]. Thomson South-Western,Mason, OH, 2007. [4] Robinson WC. What is a government subsidy? [J]. National Tax Journal, 1967, 20(1): 86-92. [5] Hewitt-Dundas N, Roper S. Output additionality of public support for innovation: Evidence for irish manufacturing plants [J]. European Planning Studies, 2010, 18(1): 107-122. [6] Nohria N, Gulati R. Is slack good or bad for innovation?[J] Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39: 1245-1264. [7] Wu J, Liu M. The impact of managerial political connections and quality on government subsidies: Evidence from Chinese listed firms [J]. Chinese Management Studies, 2011, 5(2): 207-226. [8] Feldman M.P, Kelly M.R. The extant assessment of knowledge spillovers: Government R&D policy, economic incentives and private firm behavior [J]. Research Policy, 2006, 35: 1509-1521. [9] Berle A.A, Means G.C. The modern corporation and private property [M]. London: Macmillan. 1932. [10] Rechner P., Dalton D. CEO duality and organizational performance: A longitudinal analysis [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1991, 12: 155-160. [11] Kim K.H., Buchanan R. CEO duality leadership and firm risk-taking propensity [J]. Journal of Applied Business Research, 2008, 24(1): 27-42. [12] Claessens S., Djankov S., Lang L.H.P. The separation of ownership and control in east asian corporations [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2000, 58: 81-112. [13] Johnson S., La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A. Tunnelling [J]. American Economic Review, 2000, 90(2): 22-27. [14] Claessens S., Djankov S., Fan J.P.H, Lang L.H.P. Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings [J]. Journal of Finance, 2002, 57(6): 2741-2771. [15] 张华,张俊喜,宋敏. 所有权和控制权分离对企业价值的影响—我国民营上市企业的实证研究[J].经济学(季刊),2004(3):1-14. [16] 汪剑锋. 治理环境、两权分离与公司投资行为[J],广西财经学院学报,2011(5): 78-83. [17] Wu J, Shanley M. KnowledgeStock, exploration and innovation: Research on the united states electromedical industry [J]. Journal of Business Research, 2009, 62(4): 474-483. [18] Maddala G.S. Limited dependent variable models using panel data [J]. Journal of Human Resources, 1987, 22: 305-338. [19] Hausman J., Hall B.H., Griliches Z. Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship [J]. Econometrica, 1984, 52: 909-938.

基金

对外经济贸易大学杰出青年学者培育计划(项目编号:14JQ03,2013年1月-2015年12月);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(不确定技术变革条件下的产业追赶机制研究:以中国(后发国家)的家电和汽车制造业为例,项目编号:12YJC790235,2012年1月-2014年12月);国家社会科学基金重大项目("十二五"时期我国发展的创新驱动战略研究,项目编号:11&ZD004,2012年1月-2014年12月);对外经济贸易大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金"'走出去'背景下中国企业创新能力提升战略创新团队"(项目编号:CXTD-4-07,2013年1月-2015年12月)。


PDF(1 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/