基于中国发明专利数据的专利质量测度研究

科研管理 ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (11): 68-76.

基于中国发明专利数据的专利质量测度研究

宋河发, 穆荣平, 陈芳, 张思重, 李振兴

中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所, 北京 100190

收稿日期:2014-02-12 修回日期:2014-10-14 出版日期:2014-11-25 发布日期:2014-11-21
作者简介:宋河发(1968-),男(汉),河南平顶山人,副研究员,博士,研究方向为知识产权与创新政策。
基金资助:
国家知识产权局发展规划司"中国发明专利质量指标体系与统计分析"(2013)专项资助。

Patent quality indicator system: Measurement based on China invention patent data

Song Hefa, Mu Rongping, Chen Fang, Zhang Sizhong, Li Zhenxing

The Institute of Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100090

Received:2014-02-12 Revised:2014-10-14 Online:2014-11-25 Published:2014-11-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文研究了专利质量的内涵和构成,从发明创造质量、文件撰写质量、审查质量和经济质量四个方面构建了专利质量测度指标体系,并实证测度了中国31个省市区和中外7个国家的发明专利的质量,最后提出了提升我国专利质量的政策建议。2011到2012年,我国发明专利质量呈提升趋势,撰写质量、经济质量均有提高,而创造质量有所降低。东部地区各类专利质量总体最好,中部次之,西部最低。在8个主要国家中,中国专利质量最低,只有专利审查质量相对较高。

关键词: 发明专利, 专利质量, 测度指标体系, 比较研究

Abstract: The paper studies the connotation of patent quality and its composition, and builds up a system to measure the patent quality from four dimensions: invention quality, document quality, quality under examination, and commercial quality. From 2011 to 2012, the patent quality of China has slightly improved. Both document quality and commercial quality has improved, while invention quality witnesses a decline. The patent quality in Eastern region of China is the best, while the patent quality in mid-western regions is relatively lower. Among the 7 selected countries, the patent quality of China shows the worst performance, especially the document quality and the commercial quality. In the end, the paper puts forward some policy recommendations to improve the patent quality of China.

Key words: inventive patent, patent quality, indicator system, comparative study

中图分类号:

D923.41

宋河发, 穆荣平, 陈芳, 张思重, 李振兴. 基于中国发明专利数据的专利质量测度研究[J]. 科研管理, 2014, 35(11): 68-76.

Song Hefa, Mu Rongping, Chen Fang, Zhang Sizhong, Li Zhenxing. Patent quality indicator system: Measurement based on China invention patent data[J]. Science Research Management, 2014, 35(11): 68-76.

参考文献

[1] Dan Prod'homme.Measuring, Explaining and addressing patent quality issues in China[J].Intellectual Asset Management, 2013:41-47. [2] United States International Trade Commission. China: Effects of intellectual property infringement and indigenous innovation policies on the U.S[R]. Economy: Investigation No. 332-519. March, 2010. [3] Mariagrazia Squicciarini. Measuring patent quality and radicalness: New indicators[R]. OECD Expert Workshop, 10-11 May 2012. [4] Giuseppe Scellato,Mario Calderini,Federico Caviggioli,Chiara Franzoni,Elisa Ughetto,EvisaKica,Victor Rodriguez1 Study on the quality of the patent system in Europe[R]. Tender MARKT/2009/11/D, Contract Notice in the Official Journal of the European Union 2009/S 147-214675 of 04/08/2009,March 2011. [5] Suzanne Andersen Scotchmer. Patent quality, patent design, and patent politics[R]. Remarks prepared as a member of the Economic Advisory Group, European Patent Office, Munich, December 10, 2004. [6] Graf, S. W. Improving patent quality through identification of relevant prior art: Approaches to increase information flow to the patent office[J].Lewis & Clark Law Review, (2007)(11): 495-519. [7] Wagner, R. P. Understanding patent-quality mechanisms[J].University of Pennsylvania Law Review, (2009)(157):2135-2173. [8] European Chamber. Dulling the cutting-edge: How patent-related policies and practices hamper innovation in China[R].August,2012. [9] Matthis de Saint-Georgesa, Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie.A quality index for patent systems[J]. Research Policy, (2013) 42:704-719. [10] Van Pottelsberghe, B. The quality factor in patent systems, industrial and corporate change[J]. (2011)20( 6):1755-1793. [11] R.P. Merges, Commercial success and patent standards: Economic perspectives on innovation[J]. California Law Review, (1988)(76): 805-876. [12] J. Thomas. The responsibility of the rule maker: Comparative approaches to patent administration reform[J]. Berkeley Tech. L. J. 17 (2002):728-761. [13] R.P. Merges. As many as six impossible patents before breakfast: Property rights for business concepts and patent system reform||[J], Berkeley Technology Law Journal, (1999) 14:577-615. [14] Hall, B. H. and Harhoff D. Post-Grant Reviews in the US Patent System - Design Choices and Expected Impact[J], Berkeley Technology Law Journal, (2004)(19)3:989-891. [15] 宋河发,穆荣平,陈芳.专利质量及其测度方法与测度指标体系研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理.2010(10):21-27.Song Hefa, Mu Rongping, Chenfang. Study on the patent quality and its measurement index system[J]. Science of Science and management of S&T. 2010(10): 21-27. [16] Burke, P., Reitzig, M. Measuring patent assessment quality-Analyzing the degree and kind of (in) consistency in patent offices' decision making[J]. Research Policy, 2007 (36 )9:1404-1430. [17] The patent scorecard 2004[R]. Technology Review. 2004(107):4. [18] Pantros IP. Patent Factor Index.[EB/OL].www.pantrosip.com. [19] Schankerman M.Pakes. A estimates of the value of patent rights in European countries during the post-1950 period[J]. Economic Journal,1986(97):1-25. [20] Henderson, A.B. Jaffe and M. Trajtenberg. Universities as a source of commercial technology: A detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965-1988[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, (1998) 80:119-127. [21] Mark Hirschey, Vernon J. Richardson.Are scientific indicators of patent quality useful to investors?[J] Journal of Empirical Finance, 2004(11)1:91-107. [22] Ernst H. Patent information for strategic technology management.[J] World Patent Information, 2003 (25): 233-242. [23] D. Hicks, T. Breitzman, D. Olivastro and K. Hamilton. The changing composition of innovative activity in the US-a portrait based on patent analysis[J], Res. Policy (2001) (30)4:681-703. [24] Yu-Shan Chen and Ke-Chiun Chang. The relationship between a firm's patent quality and its market value - The case of US pharmaceutical industry[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. [25] LanjouwJ.O. and SchankemanM. Patent quality and research productivity: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators[J]. Ecnomic Journal,2004:114-465. [26] Mariani M., Romaneli M."Stacking" and "picking" innovation:"The patent behavior of european inventers[J].Research Policy,2007(36):128-1142. [27] Hall B.H., Thoma G., TorrisiS. The market value of patent and R&D: Evidence from european firms[R].NBER Working Paper 13426,2007. [28] Schettino F.Sterlacchini A. and Venturini F. Inventive productivity and patent quality: Evidence from italian inventers[R]. MPRA Paper No.7872,2008. [29] OECD.Measuring patent quality: Indicators of technological and economical[R]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787. [30] 金泽俭等.从无效程序审视发明专利质量[R].2012.Jin Zejian, etc. Assess quality of invention patent from the perspective of invalidation[R]. 2012. [31] Examination quality control.[EB/OL].http://www.kipo.go.kr/kpo/user.td3.