基于组织类型和区域边界两个维度将跨区域研发合作划分为四种模式,采用北京、上海和广东三大典型区域1985-2008年的发明专利数据,考察了三类主要邻近性因素对不同跨区域研发合作模式的影响。结果表明:地理邻近对跨区域企业间、跨区域学研机构间合作的影响均不显著;技术邻近对跨区域研发合作模式影响大多为负;关系邻近对跨区域研发合作模式影响大多为正,且这种正向作用在跨区域企业间、跨区域学研机构间的合作中尤为突出。最后,结合区域创新资源配置和跨区域知识流动方式,对我国典型地区的跨区域研发合作主导模式及邻近性的不同作用进行了讨论。
Abstract
Based on two dimensions of organization type and regional boundary, the inter-regional R&D collaborations are classified into four patterns. Then, by use of the co-invention patent data of Beijing, Shanghai and Guangdong in 1985-2008, this paper examines the effects of geographical, technological and relational proximity on inter-regional R&D collaboration activities. The results show that in inter-regional R&D collaborations, the geographical proximity plays no significant role in inter-firm and inter-research organization collaboration patterns; the technological proximity mostly has significant negative effect on inter-regional R&D collaborations, while the relational proximity has significantly positive effect in most cases, especially in inter-firm and inter-research organization collaboration patterns. Finally, by combining the perspective of regional innovation resource allocation and inter-regional knowledge flow pattern, this paper discusses the dominant inter-regional R&D patterns and the roles played by three proximities in Chinese typical regions.
关键词
邻近性 /
跨区域 /
研发合作 /
模式
Key words
proximity /
inter-regional /
R&D collaboration /
patterns
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 魏守华, 吴贵生.我国跨行政区科技合作的成因、模式与政策建议[J].中国软科学,2004(7):100-105.
[2] 袁立科, 张宗益.创新系统的区域可达性研究[J].科研管理,2007,28(1):1-6,32.
[3] Acosta M,Coronado D,Ferrándiz E,et al.Factors affecting inter-regional academic scientific collaboration within Europe-the role of economic distance[J].Scitometrics,2011,87(1):63-74.
[4] D'Este, P,Guy F,Iammarino S.Shaping the formation of university-industry research collaborations:What type of proximity does really matter?[J].Journal of Economic Geography,2013.,13(4):537-558.
[5] Liang LL,Zhu L.Major factors affecting China's inter-regional research collaboration:Regional scientific productivity and geographical proximity[J].Scientometrics,2002,55(2):287-316.
[6] Scherngell T,Hu Y.Collaborative knowledge production in China:Regional evidence from a gravity model approach[J].Regional Studies,2011,45(6):755-772.
[7] Von Proff S,Brenner T.The dynamics of inter-regional collaboration-An analysis of co-patenting[R].Innovation and Space Working Papers No.06,2011.
[8] Maggioni MA,Mario Nosvelli M,Uberti TE.Space versus networks in the geography of innovation:A european analysis[J].Regional Science,2007,86(3):471-493.
[9] Cunningham SW,Werker C.Proximity and collaboration in european nanotechnology[J].Regional Science,2012,91(4):723-742.
[10] 洪伟. 区域校企专利合作创新模式的变化——基于社会网络方法的分析[J].科学学研究,2010(1):40-46.
[11] Hong W., Su YS.The effect of institutional proximity in non-local university-industry collaborations:An analysis based on Chinese patent data[J].Research Policy,2013,42(2):454-464.
[12] Bouba-Olga O,Ferru M,Pépin D.Exploring spatial features of science-industry partnerships:A study on french data[J].Regional Science,2011,91(2):355-375.
[13] Petruzzelli AM.The impact of technological relatedness,prior ties,and geographical distance on university-industry collaborations:A joint-patent analysis[J].Technovation,2011,(31):309-319.
[14] Scherngell T,Barber M.Distinct spatial characteristics of industrial and publicresearch collaborations:Evidence from the fifth EU framework programme[J].The Annals of Regional Science,2011,46(2):247-266.
[15] Ponds, R.,Oort FV,Frenken K.The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration[J].Regional Science,2007,86(3):423-443.
[16] 刘凤朝, 姜滨滨,马艳艳,闫菲菲.区域研发合作开放模式及其创新产出效应——以北京、上海、广东为例[J].科学学研究,2012,30(11):1741-1748.
[17] 李纪珍. 研究开发合作的原因与组织[J].科研管理,2000,21(1):106-112.
[18] Boschma R.Proximity and innovation:A critical assessment[J].Regional Studies,2005,39(1):61-74.
[19] Hoekman J,Frenken K,Tijssen RJW.Research collaboration at a distance:Changing spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe[J].Research Policy,2010,39(5):662-673.
[20] Knoben J.Oerlemans LAG.Proximity and inter-organization collaboration:A literature review[J].International Journal of Management Reviews,2006,8(2):71-89.
[21] Von Proff S,Dettmann A.Inventor collaboration over distance:A comparison of academic and corporate patents[J].Scientometrics,2013,94(3):1217-1238.
[22] 马 艳艳, 刘凤朝,孙玉涛.大学-企业合作网络结构及对企业创新产出效应[J].研究与发展管理,2012(6):1-7.
[23] 尹丽春,杨中楷, 殷福亮,刘则渊.国内外专利研究的比较分析[J].科研管理,2008,29(6):95-100.
[24] Hong W. Decline of the center:The decentralizing process of knowledge transfer of Chinese universities from 1985 to 2004[J].Research Policy,2008,37(4):580-595.
[25] 张丽华, 林善浪.技术距离对于我国区域技术创新产出的影响——基于省级面板数据的研究[J].研究与发展管理,2011(2):1-7.
[26] Kim C, Song J.Creating new technology through alliances:An empirical investigation of joint patents[J].Technovation,2007,27(8):461-470.
[27] Hausman J,Hall BH,Griliches Z.Econometric models for count data with an application to patent R&D relationship[J].Econometrica,1984,52(4):909-938.
[28] 刘磊,胡树华. 国内外R&D管理比较研究及对中国科技资源配置的启示[J].科学学研究,2000,18(1):62-66.
基金
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71173026),起止时间:2012.1-2015.12。
PDF(1 KB)
