盈利能力、技术创新能力与资本结构—基于高新技术企业的实证分析

科研管理 ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 48-57.

盈利能力、技术创新能力与资本结构—基于高新技术企业的实证分析

周艳菊, 邹飞, 王宗润

中南大学商学院, 湖南长沙 410083

收稿日期:2012-02-24 修回日期:2012-11-09 出版日期:2014-01-25 发布日期:2014-01-25
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目"基于决策主体行为的多产品订货与定价研究"(71171201，2012.1-2015.12);国家自然科学基金项目"银行的风险相关与经济资本集成研究"(70973145，2010.01-2012.12);国家自然科学基金创新群体项目"复杂环境下不确定性决策的理论与应用研究"(70921001，2010.1-2012.12)。

Relationships among profitability,technology innovation capability and capital structure——An empirical analysis based on high-tech firms

Zhou Yanju, Zou Fei, Wang Zongrun

Business School, Central South University, Changsha 410083, Hunan, China

Received:2012-02-24 Revised:2012-11-09 Online:2014-01-25 Published:2014-01-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于126家沪市A股上市高新技术企业2008-2010年的数据，利用面板数据模型，研究了技术创新能力与高新技术企业资本结构间的关系，并考察盈利能力对"关系"的影响。研究表明，高新技术企业的研发人员投入、专利授权量(公开量)与负债水平正相关，而研发资金投入、发明专利申请量与负债水平负相关。盈利能力的"风险基准"降低作用与"激励动机"提升作用并存。拥有高盈利能力的高新技术企业可能会为了提高员工的研发积极性，在某些情况下，虽有"风险基准"降低的优势，但更倾向使用股权融资，即"激励动机"的提升作用。本文丰富了现有研究，为高新技术企业的融资决策提供了有益的借鉴。

关键词: 盈利能力, 技术创新能力, 高新技术企业, 资本结构

Abstract: Based on the data of 126 high-tech firms listed in SSE A-share market over the period 2008 to 2010, and using the panel data model,this paper examines the relation between technology innovation capability and capital structure of Chinese listed high-tech firms, and it investigates meanwhile the adjustment function of profitability on such relation. It is found out that the percentage of R&D staff and the number of patents granted is positively related to the debt level, while the funding for R&D and the number of inventions applied is negatively related to the debt level. Furthermore, profitability's effect on reducing "risk benchmark" coexists with profitability's effect on improving "incentive motivation". It predicts that, in some cases, in order to stimulate the R&D initiative of employees, high-tech firms with high profitability tend to resort to equity finance, although they have the advantage of low "risk benchmark". In this paper, a beneficial supplement is made to some existing theory to provide some reference for the decision making of the high-tech enterprises' finance.

Key words: profitability, technology innovation capability, high-tech firms, capital structure

中图分类号:

F272.3

周艳菊, 邹飞, 王宗润. 盈利能力、技术创新能力与资本结构—基于高新技术企业的实证分析[J]. 科研管理, 2014, 35(1): 48-57.

Zhou Yanju, Zou Fei, Wang Zongrun. Relationships among profitability,technology innovation capability and capital structure——An empirical analysis based on high-tech firms[J]. Science Research Management, 2014, 35(1): 48-57.

参考文献

[1] 洪锡熙,沈艺峰. 我国上市公司资本结构影响因素的实证分析[J]. 厦门大学学报(哲学社会科版),2000,143(3):114-120.
[2] 肖作平. 公司治理结构对资本结构选择的影响—来自中国上市公司的证据[J]. 经济评论,2005(1):67-77.
[3] 姜付秀,刘志彪,李焰. 不同行业内公司之间资本结构差异研究—以中国上市公司为例[J]. 金融研究,2008(5):172-185.
[4] 苏冬蔚,曾海舰. 宏观经济因素、企业家信心与公司融资选择[J]. 金融研究,2011(4):129-142.
[5] 龙勇,杨晓燕. 风险投资对技术创新能力的作用研究[J]. 科技进步与对策,2009,26(23):16-20.
[6] 龙勇,庞思迪,张合. 风险资本投资后管理对高新技术企业治理结构影响研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理,2010(9):158-162.
[7] 龙勇,常青华. 高新技术企业创新类型、融资方式与联盟战略关系的实证研究[J]. 管理工程学报,2010,24(2):13-21.
[8] 龙勇,梅德强,常青华. 风险投资对高新技术企业技术联盟策略影响—以吸收能力为中介的实证研究[J]. 科研管理,2011,32(7):76-84.
[9] Long M, Malitz I. The investment-financing nexus:some empirical evidence[J]. Midland Corporate Finance Journal,1985,3:53-59.
[10] Simerly RL, Li M. Environmental dynamism,capital structure and performance: a theoretical integration and an empirical test[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(1): 31-49.
[11] Vincente-Lorente JD, Specificity and opacity as resource-based determinants of capital structure:evidence for Spanish manufacturing firms[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2001,22(2): 157-177.
[12] Onathan P. O'Brein. The capital structure implications of pursuing a strategy of innovation [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2003,(1):415-431.
[13] Jensn M. C., Meckling W. H. Theory of the Firm:Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs,and Capital Structure[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, (3):305-360.
[14] Arundel Anthony. The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation [J]. Research Policy, 2001, 30,611-624.
[15] Li Xibao,Sources of External Technology, Absorptive Capacity, and Innovation Capability in Chinese State-Owned High-Tech Enterprises[J]. World Development,2011, 39(7):1240-1248.
[16] 陈钰芬,陈劲. 开放式创新促进创新绩效的机理研究[J]. 科研管理,2009,30(4):1-9.
[17] 温成玉,刘志新. 技术并购对高新技术上市公司创新绩效的影响[J]. 科研管理,2011,32(5):71-7.
[18] Balkin D. B.,Markman G. D.,Gomez-Mejia L. R. Is CEO pay in high technology firms related to innovation? Some empirical evidence[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2000,43(6):1118-1129.
[19] Makri M.,Lane P. J.,Gomez-Mejia L. R. CEO Incentives,innovation,and performance in technology-intensive firms:a reconciliation of outcome and behavior-based incentives schemes[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2006,27(11):1057-1080.
[20] 陈爽英,井润田,龙小宁,邵云飞. 民营企业家社会关系资本对研发投资决策影响的实证研究[J]. 管理世界,2010(1):88-97.
[21] 陆国庆. 中国中小板上市公司产业创新的绩效研究[J]. 经济研究,2011(2):138-148.
[22] 任曙明,陈焕. 产业技术创新能力与资本结构关系的实证研究—以我国上市公司为例[J]. 科技进步与对策,2009,26(9):63-66.
[23] Graham J. R., Harvey C. R. How do CFOs Make Capital Budgeting and Capital Structure Decisions? [J]. The Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 2002, 15(1) :8-23.
[24] 肖泽忠,邹宏. 中国上市公司资本结构的影响因素和股权融资偏好[J]. 经济研究,2008(6):119-134.
[25] 屈耀辉,傅元略. 优序融资理论的中国上市公司数据验证—兼对股权融资偏好再检验[J]. 财经研究,2007,33(2):108-118.
[26] 王跃堂,王亮亮,彭洋. 产权性质、债务税盾与资本结构[J]. 经济研究,2010(9):122-136.