专利质量表征及其有效性:中国机械工具类专利案例研究

陈海秋, 韩立岩

科研管理 ›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5) : 93-101.

PDF(1055 KB)
PDF(1055 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5) : 93-101.
论文

专利质量表征及其有效性:中国机械工具类专利案例研究

  • 陈海秋, 韩立岩
作者信息 +

Indicators for patent quality and their effectiveness:A case study on machine tools patents issued by SIPO

  • Chen Haiqiu, Han Liyan
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

在全球专利膨胀的大背景下,有效的早期专利评价指标是把握技术发展态势服务战略和技术管理的有力工具。本文以中国专利局1986-2005年间授权的机械工具领域发明专利为研究对象,以专利文献中早期可获得的经济或技术信息为基础构建出专利质量早期表征指标,选择专利维持时间作为专利质量的代理变量,建立生存分析模型,利用SPSS统计软件研究了这些早期指标表征专利质量的有效性。研究表明,该技术领域中权利要求项数的增加能够降低国内专利生存危险,专利说明书页数和发明人数的增加能够降低国外专利生存风险,对应专利组的平均专利质量也相对高。结果说明,权利要求项数、说明书页数、发明人数等早期文献指标能够不同程度地表征专利质量。本研究结果、思路及方法对探索和确定早期专利评价指标特别是适合中国专利数据的指标具有启发性,也为从广义虚拟经济的角度研究专利资产价值提供参考。

Abstract

Against the background of explosive expansion of patent quantity worldwide,the effective evaluation indicators at the early stage of patents serve as a powerful tool for mastering the technology development trend, service strategy, and technological management. Taking machine tool patents issued by State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) of China during the period of 1986-2005 as a research object, early stage indicators are constructed based on the economic or technical information obtained in the early patent bibliography, and the patent renewal duration is selected as the proxy variable of the patent quality. How effective the patent quality characterized by these indicators is studied with the aid of the statistical software of SPSS and Cox survival analysis modeling. It is found that the increase of claim number is able to reduce the survival risk of internal patents, meanwhile the increase of both specification pages and inventors is able to reduce the survival risk of external patents, and the average patent quality for corresponding group is relatively higher. It is further indicated that the number of patent claims, patent specification pages, and inventors are able to reflect patent quality with the different degrees. The results and approaches of the study enlighten on the exploration and determination of early stage patent evaluation indicators, and these indicators are especially suitable to the SIPO data, and provide the reference for the study of patent asset value in the view of generalized fictitious economics.

关键词

专利质量 / 专利文献信息 / 评价指标 / 有效性

Key words

patent quality / patent bibliometrics / evaluation indicator / effectiveness

引用本文

导出引用
陈海秋, 韩立岩. 专利质量表征及其有效性:中国机械工具类专利案例研究[J]. 科研管理. 2013, 34(5): 93-101
Chen Haiqiu, Han Liyan. Indicators for patent quality and their effectiveness:A case study on machine tools patents issued by SIPO[J]. Science Research Management. 2013, 34(5): 93-101
中图分类号: F306.0   

参考文献

[1] Griliches,Z. Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey[J].Journal of Economic Literature,1990(28):1661-1707.
[2] Pakes,A. and Schankerman,M. The rate of obsolescence of patents, research gestation lags, and the private rate of return to research resources[A].Griliches,Z. R&D, Patents and Productivity[C].The University of Chicago Press,1984:73-88.[EB/OL] http://www.nber.org/chapters/c10045. pdf.
[3] Schankerman,M. and Pakes, A. Estimates of the value of patent rights in European countries during the post 1950 period[J]. Economic Journal,1986:1052-1076.
[4] Duguet,E. and Lung,N. R&D Investment,Patent Life and Patent Value[R],1997,Working paper No. G9705,Institut National de la Statistique et des etudes Economiques,Malakoff Cedex.
[5] Scherer, M. The size distribution of profit from innovation[J], Annals of Economics and Statistics, 1998(49/50):495-615.
[6] Richard, J.S. Estimates of the Value of Patent Rights in Britain and Ireland[J]. Economic,1994(61): 37-58.
[7] Carpenter,M. Narin,F. and Woolf,P. Citation rates to the technological important patents[J]. World Patent Information,1981(3-4):160-163.
[8][JP2]Narin,F. Patent bilbiometrics[J].Scientometrics, 1994 (30):47-155.
[9] Albert,M.B., Avery,D., Narin,F. and McAlllster,P. Direct Validation and Citation Counts as Indicators of Industrially Important Patents[J].Research Policy,1991,20(3):251-259.
[10] Harhoff,D., Narin,F., Scherer,F. and Vopel,K. Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Inventions[J].The Review of Economics and Statistics,1999(81):511-515.
[11] Hall,B.H., Jaffe,A., and Trajtenberg,M. Market value and patent citations[J].The Rand Journal of Economics, 2000, 36(1):16.C38.
[12] Trajtenberg,M. A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations[J].Rand Journal of Economics, 1990(21): 172-187.
[13] Hall,B.H., Jaffe,A. B. and Trajtenberg, M. The NBER patent citations data file: lessons, insights and methodological tools[R]. 2001, Working Paper, No. 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research.
[14] Putnam,J. The value of international patent rights[D].PhD Thesis. Yale University, 1996.
[15] Lanjouw,J.O.and Schankerman,M. Patent quality and research productivity: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators[J].Economic Journal,2004,114(495):441-465.
[16] Shane,S. Technological opportunities and new firm creation[J].Management Science,2001,47 (2):205-220.
[17] Guellec,D. and van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie B. The value of patents and patenting strategies: countries and technology areas patterns[J].Economics of Innovation and New Technology,2002, 11(2):133-148.
[18] Tong,X. and Frame,L.D. Technological performance and patent claims data[J].Research Policy, 1992(23):133-141.
[19] Lee,Y.G., Lee,J.D., Song,Y.I. etc al. An in-depth empirical analysis of patent citation counts using Zero-inflated count data model: the case of KIST[J].Scientometrics,2007,70(1): 27-39.
[20] Reitzig, M. Improving patent valuation methods for management-validating new indicators by understanding patenting strategies[R], 2001,October.[EB/OL] http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/view doc/summary?doi=10.1.1.17.4822.
[21] Reitzig, M. Improving patent valuation for management purpose-validating new indicators by analyzing application rationales[J].Research Policy, 2004(33):939-957.
[22] 宋河发,穆荣平,陈芳. 专利质量及其测度方法与测度指标体系研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2010(4): 21-27.
[23] 乔永忠.专利维持时间影响因素研究[J].科研管理, 2011(7):143-149.
[24] 高山行,郭华涛.中国专利权质量估计及分析[J]. 管理工程学报,2002(3): 66-68.
[25] 黄庆,曹津燕,瞿卫军等.专利评价指标体系(一)-专利评价指标体系的设计和构建[J].知识产权, 2004(9):26.
[26] 万小丽. 专利指标研究[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2009.
[27] 乔永忠.基于专利情报视角的专利维持时间影响因素分析[J].图书情报工作,2009(4):42-45.
[28] Pakes,A. and Simpson,M. Patent renewal data[R]. Brookings Papers: Macroeconomics.1989:331-410.
[29] Schmoch,U.Concept of a Technology Classification for Country Comparisons[R].Report to the World Intellectual Property Organization(WIPO),2008.[EB/OL] http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/ classifications/en/_ce_41/ipc_ce_41_5-annex1.pdf.
[30] 钱浚. 生存分析中删失数据比例对Cox回归模型影响的研究[D].广州:南方医科大学,2009.
[31] Grouqvist, C. The Private Value of Patents by Patent Characteristics: Evidence from Finland[J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer,2009,34(2):159-168.

基金

国防科工委技术基础项目(22060303);国家自然科学基金项目(71173008);广义虚拟经济项目(GX2011-1004(Y))。

PDF(1055 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/