科技投资体系：来自韩国和台湾的实践经验

科研管理 ›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (12): 94-99.

科技投资体系：来自韩国和台湾的实践经验

张明喜

科学技术部中国科学技术发展战略研究院, 北京 100038

收稿日期:2011-11-18 修回日期:2012-11-09 出版日期:2013-12-17 发布日期:2013-12-17

Science and technology investment system：Experiences from the practices of South Korea and Taiwan

Zhang Mingxi

Chinese Academy of Science and Technology for Development Strategies, Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China, Beijing 100038, China

Received:2011-11-18 Revised:2012-11-09 Online:2013-12-17 Published:2013-12-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文从韩国和台湾赶超阶段的科技投资体系构建过程出发，剖析了科技投资体系演化特征，总结了赶超阶段科技投资政策的实践与经验。在此基础上，提出构建我国科技投资体系的政策建议。在科技财税政策取向上，应完善科技预算，增加财政科技投入，创新使用方式，优化投入的空间配置。在科技金融政策取向上，应加快建立多元化、多层次、多渠道的科技金融体系，营造良好的科技金融生态环境。

关键词: 赶超经验, 科技投资, 科技金融, 机制创新

Abstract: From the building process of the S&T investment system during the catch-up stage in Korea and Taiwan, this paper studies the evolution characteristic of the S&T investment system and summarizes the practice and experiences of the S&T investment policies in the catch-up stage. On this basis, it proposes suggestions to construct China's S&T investment system. In the orientation of the fiscal and taxation policy, we should better the fiscal budget system, increase the national fiscal investment in science and technology, innovate the patterns of expenditure, and optimize the spatial configuration of the investment. In the orientation of the financial policy, we should speed up the establishment of the financial system of science and technology with diversification, multi-levels and multi-channels, and build up the sound financial and ecological environment of science and technology.

Key words: Experiences in the catch-up stage, S&T investment, S&T finance, mechanism innovation

中图分类号:

F204

张明喜. 科技投资体系：来自韩国和台湾的实践经验[J]. 科研管理, 2013, 34(12): 94-99.

Zhang Mingxi. Science and technology investment system：Experiences from the practices of South Korea and Taiwan[J]. Science Research Management, 2013, 34(12): 94-99.

参考文献

[1] OECD.National innovation systems[R].Paris:OECD, 1997:15-20.
[2] Bayoumi.T, Coe.D.T. Liberating Supply:Fiscal Policy and Technological Innovation in a Multicountry Model[R], IMF Working paper, 1998:3-20.
[3] David, P.A., B.H. Hall and A.A. Toole. Is Public R&D a Complement ox Substitute for Private R&D? A Review of the Econometric Evidence[J].Research Policy, 2000. vo1.29:497-529.
[4] LEE, T.J. Technological Learning by National R&D:The Case of Korea in CANDU-type Nuclear Fuel[J].Technovation, 2004, 24:287-297.
[5] Blanes, J.V and I. Busom, Who Participates in R&D Subsidy Programs? The Case of Spanish Manufacturing Firms[J]. Research Policy, 2004, vo1.33:1459-1476.
[6] 邹薇.代谦.技术模仿、人力资本积累与经济赶超[J].中国社会科学, 2003(5):27-37.
[7] 秦涛.浅析赶超型经济体之研发经费与科技产出[J].中国科技论坛, 2004(7):131-135.
[8] 张亚斌等.后发国家知识产权保护与技术赶超[J].中国软科学, 2006(7):60-67.
[9] 刘本盛.关于国家创新体系建设的思考与建议[J].管理世界, 2007(8):153-154.
[10] 徐晓雯.政府科技投入对企业科技投入的政策效果研究[J], 财政研究, 2010(10):23-26.
[11] 中国经济增长与宏观稳定课题组.资本化扩张与赶超型经济的技术进步[J].经济研究, 2010(5):4-20.
[12] 张明喜.韩国、台湾赶超阶段科技投资的特征及其启示[J].科技与经济, 2011(1):7-12.
[13] 郭戎.中国的科技投资:理论、现状与创新[J].中国科技论坛, 2011(1):5-12.
[14] 龚平.科技创新:再造台湾[J]. 中国科技投资, 2006:60-63.
[15] 李大明, 尹磊.支持自主创新:税收政策之比较——以韩国、印度、新加坡和台湾为例[J].涉外税务, 2006(10):36-40.
[16] 赵晓庆, 许庆瑞.自主创新模式的比较研究[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2009(4):56-57.