关系资本,锁定效应与中国制造业企业创新

科研管理 ›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (11): 42-52.

关系资本,锁定效应与中国制造业企业创新

杨震宁¹, 李东红², 马振中³

1. 对外经济贸易大学国际商学院, 北京 100029;
2. 清华大学经济管理学院, 北京 100084;
3. 加拿大温莎大学ODETTE商学院, 加拿大安大略省温莎市 N9B3P4

收稿日期:2011-11-10 修回日期:2012-10-16 出版日期:2013-11-13 发布日期:2013-11-13
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目资助(不确定技术变革条件下的产业追赶机制研究:以中国(后发国家)的家电和汽车制造业为例,项目编号:12YJC790235,2012年1月-2014年12月);国家自然基金面上项目资助(社会网络视角下的中国跨国公司海外子公司知识转移研究,项目编号:71272019,2013年1月-2016年12月);国家社会科学基金规划项目资助(我国战略新兴产业技术创新路径研究,项目编号:12BGL019,2013年1月-2015年12月)对外经济贸易大学创新团队建设项目资助("走出去"背景下中国企业创新能力提升战略创新团队,项目编号:CXTD-4-07)。

Relational capital, lock-in effectiveness and enterprise innovationin the Chinese manufacturing industry

Yang Zhenning¹, Li Donghong², Ma Zhenzhong³

1. Business School, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China;
2. School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
3. Odette School of Business, University of Windsor, Ontario Windsor N9B 3P4, Canada

Received:2011-11-10 Revised:2012-10-16 Online:2013-11-13 Published:2013-11-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于社会资本和创新理论,制造业企业跨越技术锁定获得创新绩效的过程被广泛关注。本研究详细考察了锁定效应下制造业企业关系资本的运用以及不同类型的技术战略选择对创新绩效的调节效应机制。相关研究结果表明,四种技术锁定效应显著抑制企业对创新绩效的获取,利用商业关系资本和政治关系资本帮助企业跨越了不同类型的锁定效应,提升创新绩效。而且,在当前中国转轨经济时期,模仿跟随战略比技术领先战略更适合中国企业,正确的技术战略选择也可以对冲锁定效应的影响,提升企业的创新绩效。本研究的相关结论对于理论的进一步研究与政府和企业的管理实践均有一定的参考价值。

关键词: 关系资本, 锁定效应, 技术战略, 创新绩效, 制造业企业

Abstract: Based on the theory of social capital and innovation, the processes in which the enterprises in manufacturing industry surmount the lock-in effectiveness to obtain innovation performance has drawn attention widely. This research inspected in detail the relational capital utilization of enterprises in the manufacturing industry as well as the moderator effect mechanism of different types of technical strategy choices for the innovation performance under the lock-in effectiveness. The related results indicated that four kinds of technical lock-in effectiveness obviously suppresses the enterprises in manufacturing industry to gain the innovation performance, surmounts different types of lock-in effectiveness using the business relational capital and the political relational capital and helps enterprises to promote the innovation performance. Moreover, in the current times of Chinese economic reform, the imitative following strategy is more suitable to the Chinese enterprises compared to the technological leadership strategy; the correct technological strategy choice may also hedge the impacts of the lock-in effectiveness to promote the enterprises' innovation performance. This research's related conclusion has certain referential value to the further theoretical research of the government and the enterprises' management practice.

Key words: relational capital, lock-in effectiveness, technological strategy, innovation performance, enterprises in the manufacturing industry

中图分类号:

F425

杨震宁, 李东红, 马振中. 关系资本,锁定效应与中国制造业企业创新[J]. 科研管理, 2013, 34(11): 42-52.

Yang Zhenning, Li Donghong, Ma Zhenzhong. Relational capital, lock-in effectiveness and enterprise innovationin the Chinese manufacturing industry[J]. Science Research Management, 2013, 34(11): 42-52.

参考文献

[1] Liu, X., & Buck, T. Innovation Performance and Channels for International Technology Spillovers: Evidence from Chinese High-tech Industries [J]. Research Policy, 2007, 36(3): 355-366.
[2] Sherwood, A. L. and Covin, J. G. Knowledge Acquisition in University Industry Alliances: An Empirical Investigation from a Learning Theory Perspective [J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2008, 25(2): 162-179.
[3] Elias Dinopoulos, Constantinos Syropoulos. Rent Protection as a Barrier to Innovation and Growth [J]. Economic Theory, 2007, 32: 309-332.
[4] Eric TG Wang, Cathy Chia-Lin Lin, James J. J., et al. Improving Enterprise Resource Planning Fit to Organizational Process through Knowledge Transfer [J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2007, 27(4): 200-212.
[5] 王开明,万君康. 论知识的转移与扩散 [J]. 外国经济与管理,2000,25(10):2-7.
[6] 汪应洛,李勖. 知识的转移特性研究 [J]. 系统工程理论与实践,2002(10):8-11.
[7] 李明,王云美,司春林. 企业如何走出创新困境—基于锁定效应的分析 [J]. 科技管理研究,2010(11):187-189.
[8] Rammel, C., van den Bergh, J., Evolutionary Policies for Sustainable Development: Adaptive Flexibility and Risk Minimizing [J]. Ecological Economics, 2003, 47(5): 121-133.
[9] Shapiro C., Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard-setting [J]. NBER Innovation Policy and the Economy, 2001, 1(1): 119-150.
[10] 陶爱萍,沙文兵. 技术标准,锁定效应与技术创新 [J]. 科技管理研究,2009(5):59-61.
[11] Uzzi, B., & Lancaster, R., Relational Embeddedness and Learning: The case of Bank Loan Managers and Their Clients [J]. Management Science, 2003, 49(4): 383-399.
[12] Kale, P, Singh, H., & Perlmutter, H., Learning and Protection of Proprietary Assets in Strategic Alliances: Building Relational Capital [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21(3): 217-237.
[13] 蒋春燕,赵曙明. 社会资本和公司企业家精神与绩效的关系:组织学习的中介作用 [J]. 管理世界,2006(10):90-99.
[14] Choi C. J., Lee, S. H. and Kim, J. B. A Note on Counter Trade: Contractual Uncertainty and Transaction Governance in Transition Economies [J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 1999, 30(6): 189-201.
[15] Li, H. Y., Zhang Y., The Role of Managers' Political Networking and Functional Experience in New Venture Performance: Evidence from China's Transition Economy [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2007, 28(4):791-804.
[16] Christensen, C.M., Baumann, H., Ruggles, R. and Sadtler, T.M. Disruptive Innovation for Social Change [J]. Harvard Business Review, 2006, 84(5): 94-101.
[17] Collins, C. J., & Clark, K. D., Strategic Human Resource Practices, Top management Team Social Networks and Firm Performance: The role of Human Resource Practices in Creating Organizational Competitive Advantage [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2003, 46(12): 740-751.
[18] 高建. 中国企业技术创新分析 [M],北京:清华大学出版社,1999.
[19] Milé Terziovski, Innovation Practice and Its Performance Implications in Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in the Manufacturing Sector: A Resource-Based View [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2010, 31(9): 892-912.
[20] Romijn, H., Albaladejo, M., Determinants of Innovation Capability in Small Electronics and Software Firms in Southeast England [J]. Research Policy, 2002, 31 (7): 1053-1067.
[21] Baker W E, Sinkula J.M. The Synergistic Effect of Market Orientation and Learning Orientation on Organizational Performance [J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1999, 27(7): 411-427.
[22] 杨震宁,李东红. 中国制造业企业创新:行业竞争、嵌入集群的社会资本与技术战略选择 [J],财贸经济,2010(6):98-105.
[23] Nelson, R., Sampat, B., Making Sense of Institutions as a Factor Shaping Economic Performance [J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2001, 44(2): 31-54.
[24] Munir, A., Phillips, N., The Concept of Industry and the case of Radical Technological Change [J]. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 2002, 13(4): 279-297.
[25] Peng M. W., Luo Y., Managerial Ties and Firm Performance in a Transition Economy: the Nature of a Micro-macro Link [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2000, 43(3): 486-501.
[26] Jian Cheng Guan, Zifeng Chen. The Technological System of Chinese Manufacturing Industry: A Sartorial Approach [J]. China Economic Review, 2009, 20(7): 767-776.
[27] Brozen R., Concentration, Mergers and Public Policy [M]. New York: Macmillan, 1982.