互补资产协同对企业绩效影响研究—技术关联的调节作用

科研管理 ›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (10): 84-93.

互补资产协同对企业绩效影响研究—技术关联的调节作用

贾军¹, 张卓², 张伟¹

1. 济南大学经济学院, 山东济南 250002;
2. 南京航空航天大学经济与管理学院, 江苏南京 211106

收稿日期:2012-02-06 修回日期:2012-08-25 出版日期:2013-10-27 发布日期:2013-10-19
作者简介:贾军(1980-),男,山东济南人,济南大学经济学院讲师,研究方向为企业战略管理。
张卓(1963-),男,江苏南京人,南京航空航天大学经济与管理学院教授、博士生导师,研究方向为企业战略管理。
张伟(1964-),男,河南上蔡人,济南大学经济研究中心主任、教授,研究方向为经济转型与投融资。
基金资助:
航空基金项目(2009ZG52065)"航空工业企业军民品业务协同发展机制研究"(2010.01-2011.12);国家社会科学基金项目(10BGL066)"低碳城市建设投融资机制研究"(2010.07-2013.04);山东科技发展计划项目(2009GG10010003)"基于科学发展观的山东省产业集群升级优化战略与融资对策研究"(2009.09-2011.12)。

Impact of complementary assets synergy on enterprise performance—from the prospect of moderating effects of technological relatedness

Jia Jun¹, Zhang Zhuo², Zhang Wei¹

1. Economics School of University of Jinan, Jinan 250002, China;
2. Economics and Management School of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China

Received:2012-02-06 Revised:2012-08-25 Online:2013-10-27 Published:2013-10-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在评估互补资产或技术关联与企业绩效的关系时,多数文献将这两者分离开来进行研究,忽视了互补资产间的协同对企业绩效的影响以及技术关联对两者间关系的调节作用。采用中国高技术上市公司2004-2010年面板数据,实证分析互补资产协同与企业绩效的关系以及技术关联对两者关系的调节作用。结果表明,互补资产协同与企业绩效呈正向相关关系;技术关联对生产制造互补资产与市场互补资产协同和企业绩效的关系存在负向调节作用。技术关联对生产制造互补资产与人力互补资产协同和企业绩效的关系以及市场互补资产与人力互补资产协同和企业绩效关系存在正向调节作用。在实施技术创新战略时加强技术间关联和专业化互补资产协同可使企业获取竞争优势。

关键词: 互补资产, 协同, 技术关联, 绩效

Abstract: When assessing the effects of the technological relatedness or complementary assets on the enterprise performance, most research has been carried out in isolation, neglecting the impact of the synergy of complementary assets on the enterprise performance and the moderation of the technological relatedness to them. By taking China's high-tech listed companies from 2004-2010 panel data as an example, the paper analyzes the relationship between complementary assets and enterprise performance and the moderation of the technological relatedness to their relationship. The results show that the synergy of complementary assets has a positive effect on the enterprise performance. The technological relatedness has a negative moderation to the relationship of the synergy of the manufacturing complementary assets and the marketing complementary assets on the enterprise performance. The technological relatedness has a positive moderation to the relationship of the synergy of the manufacturing complementary assets and the human complementary assets on the enterprise performance as well as to the relationship of the synergy of the marketing complementary assets and the human complementary assets on the enterprise performance. We conclude that while implementing the technological innovation strategy, strengthening the synergy of the technological relatedness and the professional complementary assets can give the enterprise the competitive advantage.

Key words: complementary assets, synergy, technological relatedness, performance

中图分类号:

F273.1

贾军, 张卓, 张伟. 互补资产协同对企业绩效影响研究—技术关联的调节作用[J]. 科研管理, 2013, 34(10): 84-93.

Jia Jun, Zhang Zhuo, Zhang Wei. Impact of complementary assets synergy on enterprise performance—from the prospect of moderating effects of technological relatedness[J]. Science Research Management, 2013, 34(10): 84-93.

参考文献

[1] Teece D J. Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy[J].Research Policy,1986,15(6):285-305. [2] Martin J, K Eisenhardt. Rewiring: Cross-Business-Unit Collaborations in Multi-business Organizations[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2010, 53(2): 265-301. [3] David J Teece. Reflections on Profiting from Innovation[J].Research Policy,2006,35(3):1131-1146. [4] Jonathan T Eckhardta, Scott A Shane. Industry changes in technology and complementary assets and the creation of high-growth firms[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2011, 26(4):412–430. [5] Lai H-C, Chiu Y-C, Liaw Y-C, Lee T-Y. Technological diversification and organizational divisionalization: The moderating role of complementary assets[J]. British Journal of Management,2010, 21(4): 983-995. [6] 蔡新蕾,高山行. 企业创新商业化实证研究——创新独占性和专有互补资产的调节作用[J].科学学研究,2011,29(9):1397-1405. [7] Farjoun M. The independent and joint effects of the skill and physical bases of relatedness in diversification[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1998, 19(7): 611-630. [8] Larsson R, Finkelstein S. Integrating strategic, organizational, and human resource perspectives on mergers and acquisitions: A case survey of synergy realization[J]. Organization Science, 1999, 10(1): 1-26. [9] Tanriverdi H, Venkatraman N. Knowledge relatedness and performance of multi-business firms[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2005,26(2): 85-108. [10] 薛红志,张玉利.突破性创新、互补性资产与企业间合作的整合研究[J].中国工业经济, 2006(8):101-108. [11] 罗珉,赵红梅.中国制造的秘密:创新+互补性资产[J].中国工业经济,2009(5):46-56. [12] 王发明. 互补性资产、产业链整合与创意产业集群——以动漫产业为例[J].中国软科学,2009(5):24-32. [13] Miller D J. Firms' technological resources and the performance effects of diversification: a longitudinal study[J].Strategic Management Journal, 2004,25(11):1097-1119. [14] Jongtae Shin, David Jalajas. Technological relatedness, boundary-spanning combination of knowledge and the impact of innovation: Evidence of an inverted-U relationship[J]. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 2010, 21(2), 87-96. [15] Christmann P.Effects of "best practices" of environmental management on cost advantage: the role of complementary assets[J].Academy of Management Journal,2000, 43(4):663-680. [16] Rothaermel F T, Hill C W L.Technological discontinuities and complementary assets: a longitudinal study of industry and firm performance[J].Organization Science,2005,16(1):52-70. [17] Barua A, A B Whinston, F Yin. Value and Productivity in the Internet Economy[J]. Computer, 2000,33(5):102-105. [18] Harrison J, Hitt M, Hoskisson R, Ireland D. Resource complementarity in business combinations: Extending the logic to organizational alliances[J]. Journal of Management, 2001, 27(6): 679-690. [19] Chiu Y-C, H-C Lai, T-Y Lee, Y-C Liaw. Technological diversification, complementary assets, and performance[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2008,75(6):875-892. [20] Osterloff M. Technology-based product market entries: Managerial resources and decision-making process [D]. Doctoral Dissertations, Helsinki University, 2003. [21] Breschi S, Lissoni F, Malerba F. Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification[J]. Research Policy, 2003,32(1): 69-87. [22] Bart Van Looy, Thierry Martens, Koenraad Debackere. Organizing for Continuous Innovation: On the Sustainability of Ambidextrous Organizations[J]. Creativity and Innovation Management Journal, 2005, 14(3): 208-219. [23] 暴海龙, 李金林. 专利技术关联性分析方法研究[J].科研管理, 2004(25):3-8. [24] W Mitchell. Whether or when? Probability and timing of incumbents' entry into emerging industrial subfields[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1989, 34(2): 208-230. [25] P Christmann. Effects of "Best Practices" of environmental management on cost advantage: the role of complementary assets[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2000, 43(4): 663-680. [26] P Taylor, J Lowe. Are functional assets or knowledge assets the basis of new product performance? [J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 1997, 9 (4):473-488. [27] Hsien-Che Lai, Yi-Chia Chiu, Yi-Ching Liaw. Can external corporate venturing broaden firm's technological scope? The role of complementary assets[J]. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2010, 27(3-4): 183 196. [28] Cool K, Schendel D. Strategic group formation and performance: the case of the U.S. pharmaceutical industry, 1963-1982[J]. Management Science,1987, 33(9): 1102-1124. [29] Montgomery C. The Measurement of Firm Diversification: Some New Empirical Evident[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1982,25(2): 299-307.