垂直专业化对创新绩效的影响及行业差异—来自中国高技术产业的经验证据

戴魁早

科研管理 ›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (10) : 42-49.

PDF(1 KB)
PDF(1 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (10) : 42-49.
论文

垂直专业化对创新绩效的影响及行业差异—来自中国高技术产业的经验证据

  • 戴魁早
作者信息 +

The influence of vertical specialization on innovation performance and its industry differences—the empirical evidence from China’s high-tech industries

  • Dai Kuizao
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

本文选取1995-2010年中国高技术产业的面板数据,在考虑创新投入和市场化进程等条件下,运用动态面板的GMM方法实证考察了垂直专业化对创新绩效的影响及行业差异。研究显示,垂直专业化促进了高技术产业创新绩效的提高,且入世后的促进作用更大;而行业特征影响着垂直专业化对高技术细分行业创新绩效的提升效果,在垄断程度较低、技术密集度较低、外向度较高的行业中,垂直专业化对创新绩效的提升效果更为显著。

Abstract

This paper selects the panel data of China's high-tech industries in the period of 1995 to 2010. Under the conditions of considering the input of R&D and the evolvement of marketization, the influence of vertical specialization on innovation performance and its industry differences are empirically examined by means of the GMM method of dynamic panel data. The results show that the vertical specialization makes a significant impact on innovation performance. Moreover, the impact is more significant after the WTO entry. However, the industry characteristics make a significant impact on the degree of which vertical specialization influences on innovation performance. In the industry which features in lower degree of monopoly or technology-intensiveness but higher degree of export-orientation, the influence of vertical specialization on innovation performance is more significant.

关键词

垂直专业化 / 创新绩效 / 行业差异 / 高技术产业

Key words

vertical specialization / innovation performance / industry differences / high-tech industry

引用本文

导出引用
戴魁早. 垂直专业化对创新绩效的影响及行业差异—来自中国高技术产业的经验证据[J]. 科研管理. 2013, 34(10): 42-49
Dai Kuizao. The influence of vertical specialization on innovation performance and its industry differences—the empirical evidence from China’s high-tech industries[J]. Science Research Management. 2013, 34(10): 42-49
中图分类号: F204   

参考文献

[1] 文东伟,冼国明.中国制造业的垂直专业化与出口增长[J].经济学(季刊),2010(1):467-494. [2] Baldwin C Y, Clark K B. Design Rules: The Power of Modularity[M].Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000. [3] Glass A J, Saggib K. Innovation and Wage Effects of International Outsourcing[J].European Economic Review, 2001,45(1):67-86. [4] Naghavi A, Ottaviano G. Offshoring and product innovation[J].Economic Theory,2009,38(3):517-532. [5] Marjit S, Mukherjee A. International Outsourcing and R&D: Long-Run Implications for Consumers[J].Review of International Economics, 2008,16(5):1010-1022. [6] 徐毅,张二震.FDI、外包与技术创新:基于投入产出表数据的经验研究[J].世界经济,2008(9):41-48. [7] 张杰,张少军,刘志彪.外包、创新与工资不平等[J].当代经济科学,2009(3):64-71. [8] 于明超,陈柳.垂直专业化与中国企业技术创新[J].当代经济科学2011(1):62-68. [9] 刘海云,唐玲.国际外包的生产率效应及行业差异[J].中国工业经济,2009(6):78-87. [10] 戴魁早.中国高技术产业垂直专业化影响因素研究[J].财经研究2011(5):89-100. [11] 李晓华.产业组织的垂直解体与网络化[J].中国工业经济,2005(7):28-35. [12] 戴魁早.产业组织模块化研究前沿探析[J].外国经济与管理,2008(1):31-38. [13] Broadberry S, Crafts N. Competition and Innovation in 1950s Britain[W].London School of Economics, 2000,57. [14] Gorg H, Henry M, Strobl E. Grant Support and Exporting Activity[J].The Review of Economics and Statistics,2008,90(1):168-174. [15] 傅家骥.技术创新学[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1998. [16] Jefferson, Gary H, Bai Huamao, Guan Xiaojing, Yu Xiaoyun. R&D Performance in Chinese Industry[J].Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2006,15(4):2-13. [17] 吴延兵.R&D存量、知识函数与生产效率[J].经济学(季刊),2006(4):1129-1156. [18] 岳希明,李实,史泰丽.垄断行业高收入问题探讨[J].中国社会科学,2010(3):77-93. [19] 樊纲,王小鲁,马光荣.中国市场化进程对经济增长的贡献[J].经济研究,2011(9):4-16.

基金

国家自然科学基金项目:"外包影响产业技术创新的机制与路径:理论与中国电子信息产业的实证研究"(编号:71263010;2013-2016);教育部人文社会科学研究课题:"垂直专业化对中国高技术产业技术创新的影响研究"(编号:12YJC790025;2013-2014);国家社科基金重大项目:"中部地区承接沿海产业转移的政策措施研究"(编号:09&ZD041;2010-2012)。


PDF(1 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/