对科技政策实施结果及其影响进行分析和评估对政府完善科技政策意义重大。本文以国家层面发布的与产业技术创新相关性最强的454条技术创新政策为研究对象,基于柯布-道格拉斯生产函数,利用2000-2009年产业面板数据,对政策力度、政策稳定性与创新绩效进行了研究。结果表明:创新政策力度对技术绩效有显著促进作用,对经济绩效不显著;政策的不稳定性会抑制政策对技术绩效的激励;政策对绩效作用存在滞后效应。比较不同政策工具对创新绩效的影响,发现供给政策对创新的技术绩效有激励作用,环境政策对技术绩效和经济绩效有激励作用,需求政策对经济绩效作用显著。最后,提出应加大需求政策供给力度,完善创新政策体系等相关建议。
Abstract
The analysis and evaluation of the implementation results and impacts of the S&T policies have great significance in enabling the government to improve such policies. The paper has collected China's 454 policies issued by the central government most relating to the industrial innovation and studies the relationship between the innovation performance and the power and stability of policy based on the C-D production function by using the 2000-2009 industry panel data. The research results reveal that the power of the innovation policy had a positive effect only on the technological performance but not on the economic performance. The instability of policy has negative effect on the motivation of the policies on the technological performance. The policy has a lag effect on the performance. Moreover, by studying the relationship between different policy instruments and the innovation performance, it is found that the supplying policy has a positive effect on the technological performance, and environment policy has a positive effect on the technological and economic performance, and the demanding policy has a positive effect on the economic performance. Finally, the paper suggests that government should pay more attention to the demanding policy and improve the innovation policy system, etc.
关键词
政策力度 /
政策稳定性 /
政策工具 /
创新绩效
Key words
power of policy /
stability of policy /
instruments of policy /
innovation performance
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Liu Fengchao(刘凤朝),Sun Yutao(孙玉涛).我国科技政策向创新政策演变的过程、趋势与建议[J]. China Soft Science(中国软科学),2007(5):34-42.
[2] Ewald Rametsteiner, Gerhard Weiss.Assessing Policies from a Systems Perspective—Experiences with Applied Innovation Systems Analysis and Implications for Policy Evaluation[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 2006 (8): 564-576.
[3] Zhao Xiaoyuan(赵筱媛),Su Jun(苏竣). 基于政策工具的公共科技政策分析框架研究[J]. Studies in Science of Science(科学学研究),2007(1):52-56.
[4] Gray, A., Libecap, D.Economic variables and law development: A case of western mineral property[J].Economic History Journal, 1978, 38(2): 338－362.
[5] Sylvie D murger and others.地理位置与优惠政策对中国地区经济发展的相关贡献[J]. Economics Research(经济研究),2002(9):14-23,92.
[6] Lanoie, P., Laurent, L. J., Johnstone, N., et al. Environment Policy, Innovation and Performance: New Insights on the Proter Hypothesie [Z]. CIRANO Working Papers, 2007, 19: 1-34.
[7] Yin Huafang(殷华方),Pan Zhen(潘镇),Lu Minghong(鲁明泓).中国外商直接投资产业政策测量和有效性研究: 1979-2003[J]. Management World(管理世界),2006(7):34-45,171,172.
[8] Peng Jisheng(彭纪生),Sun Wenxiang(孙文祥),Zhong Weiguo(仲为国). 中国技术创新政策演变与绩效实证研究[J].Science Research Management(科研管理),2008(4):140-145.
[9] Griliches Z. Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth[J]. Bell Journal of Economics, 1979, 10 (1):92-116.
[10] Jaffe A B. Real affects of academic research[J]. American Economic Review,1986,79:957-970.
[11] Zhou Ming(周明),Li Zongzhi(李宗植). 基于产业集聚的高技术产业创新能力研究[J]. Science Research Management(科研管理),2011(1):15-21,28.
[12] Gu Xiaomin(顾晓敏).促进创新政策,要防"挤出效应"[N].Wenhui Newspaper(文汇报),2011,2,14.
基金
国家自然科学基金:中国技术创新政策演变、测量与绩效—基于政策工具的研究(项目编号:70973114,起止时间:2010.1－2012.12),教育部人文社会科学规划项目:企业R&D投入、技术能力与产出绩效(项目编号:10YJA630078,起止时间:2010.10-2013.12),浙江省自然科学基金:企业R&D投入、技术能力与产出绩效(项目编号:Y7100462,起止时间:2010.9－2013.12)。
PDF(1 KB)
