分别从企业与高校两个视角基于湖北省的问卷调查对产学研合作模式进行实证对比分析,并将调查结果与国内外相关研究成果进行比较,提出了基于使用频率的产学研合作模式三梯度结构,构建了我国产学研合作模式的解释框架。结果表明,在产学研合作模式中合作研发是合作的主流模式,人才交流咨询、合作申报课题、共建实验室与研究平台和委托研发模式用得也较多,而成果转化与创建新企业模式则处于相对次要的位置。形成了我国产学研合作模式的使用频率存在明显的梯度层次、以成果转化率作为主要评价指标有碍合作的健康发展、产学研合作的重心应由技术成果转化向提升企业技术创新能力转变、会议模式是值得探讨的一种合作模式等结论与启示。
Abstract
Based on the questionnaires of Hubei Province, China, an empirical and comparative analysis on the collaborative models of Industry-University-Research institute Collaboration (IURC) has been conducted from two aspects of company and university, and then the investigation results are compared with related research results at home and abroad. A three-grad structure of collaborative models in IURC is put forward and an explanatory framework of collaborative models in China is constructed. The research results indicate that co-research is the prevalent model for IURC, and other models, such as talents exchange and consultation, cooperative biding for government projects, constructing laboratory and research platform together, and contract research, have been employed quite often; however technology transfer and setting up new companies take a second place. Finally, some conclusions and revelations are formed as follows: (1) the usage frequency of collaborative models of IURC in China has a distinct gradient gradation. (2) Using technology transfer rate for the main evaluation index becomes the hazard of the sound development of IURC. (3) The focus of IURC should be turned from technology transferring to upgrading technology innovation capability of companies. (4) The model of meetings and conferences is one of cooperative models that are worth studying and probing.
关键词
产学研合作 /
合作模式 /
比较 /
实证分析
Key words
IURC /
collaborative model /
comparison /
empirical analysis
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 原长弘.国内产学研合作学术研究的主要脉络:一个文献述评[J].研究与发展管理, 2005, 17(4): 98-109.
[2] 王娟茹,潘杰义.产学研合作模式探讨[J].科学管理研究, 2002, 20(1): 25-27.
[3] 谢科范,陈云,董芹芹.我国产学研结合传统模式与现代模式分析[J].科学管理研究, 2008, 26(1): 38-41.
[4] 袁志生,周欣荣.质量效益型的产学研联合模式[J].中国科技论坛, 2001(2): 44-46.
[5] 袁志生.课题产业公司——产学研结合的一种新方式[J].中国科技论坛, 2000(4): 70-72.
[6] 张千帆,方超龙,胡丹丹.产学研合作创新路径选择的博弈分析[J].管理学报, 2007, 4(6): 748-755.
[7] 杨东升,张永安.冲突分析理论在产学研合作中的应用[J].研究与发展管理, 2007, 19(6): 134-137.
[8] 葛如一,张朋柱.不连续技术创新产学研合作模式演变模型研究[J].中国科技论坛, 2008(3): 26-38.
[9] 王文岩,孙福全,申强.产学研合作模式的分类、特征及选择[J].中国科技论坛, 2008(5): 37-40.
[10] 仲伟俊,梅姝娥,谢园园.产学研合作技术创新模式分析 [J].中国软科学, 2009(8): 174-181.
[11] P. D’Este, P. Patel. University–industry linkages in the UK: what are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? [J] Research Policy, 2007(9): 1295-1313.
[12] S. Monjon, P. Waelbroeck. Assessing spillovers from universities to firms: evidence from French firm-level data [J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2003, 21(9): 1255-1270.
[13] Ajay Agrawal, Rebecca Henderson. Putting patents in context: exploring knowledge transfer from MIT [J]. Management Science, 2002, 48(1): 44-46.
[14] Schartinger Doris, Schibany Andras, Gassler Helmut. Interactive relations between universities and firms: empirical evidence for Austria [J]. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2001, 26(3): 255-268.
[15] Wesley M. Cohen, Richard R. Nelson and John P. Walsh. Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D [J]. Management Science, 2002, 48(1): 1-23.
[16] Christian R. Ostergaard. Knowledge flows through social networks in a cluster: comparing university and industry links [J]. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2009, 20(3): 196-210.
[17] Annam ria Inzelt. The evolution of university-industry-government relationships during transition [J]. Research Policy, 2004(33): 975-995.
[18] Mike Wright, Bart Clarysse, Andy Lockett, Mirjam Knockaert. Mid-range universities’ linkages with industry: Knowledge types and the role of intermediaries [J]. Research Policy, 2008, 37(8): 1205-1223.
[19] Cohen, W. M., R. Florida, L. Randazzese and J. Walsh. Challenges to the Research University [M]. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1998.
[20] 梅妹娥, 仲伟俊. 我国高校科技成果转化障碍因素分析 [J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2008, 29( 3): 22- 27.
基金
国家社会科学基金教育学一般课题(BIA090049,2009-2011年);国家自然科学基金项目 (70772074,2008-2010年);武汉市软科学项目 (200940833375-03,2009-2010年)。
PDF(929 KB)
