基于TRL的航空航天产品研发项目协调机制研究

王刚, 陈向东, 牛欣

科研管理 ›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (7) : 59-66.

PDF(1325 KB)
PDF(1325 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (7) : 59-66.
论文

基于TRL的航空航天产品研发项目协调机制研究

  • 王刚1, 陈向东2, 牛欣2
作者信息 +

The coordination system for R&D projects in aviationand aerospace sectors based on TRL

  • Wang Gang1, Chen Xiangdong2, Niu Xin2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

在航空航天产品研究与开发的过程中,关键技术的成熟度是必要的评价环节,也是控制此类产品研发过程风险的重要参照。本文在NASA技术成熟度测度分级体系(TRL)的基础上,将研究与开发活动分为技术风险控制为目标的技术导向集成(TOI)和以组织战略框架下时限进度控制为目标的时限导向集成(SOI)型开发活动,并依照技术成熟度分级管理模式原理,提出适合高复杂产品研发管理的一种技术瓶颈与时限制约相协调的双路风险控制的研发组织体系,对航空航天企业建设规范的研发机制以及相应的技术成熟度管理机制提供参考。

Abstract

In the R&D procedure of aviation and aerospace sectors, Technology Readiness Level (TRL) is not only a necessary evaluation link for developing key technologies involved, but also a risk controlling tool for developing related products. Based on TRL evaluating system developed by NASA, the technology development activities are classified as Technology Oriented Integration (TOI) and Scheduling Oriented Integration (SOI) activities in terms of technology developing risk control and organizational strategic timing control, respectively. A dual path risk control over R&D projects for coordinating technology bottleneck based risk control into strategic timing control in typical cases of aeronautic and astronautic sectors is proposed; it might serve as the references to R&D project management and well organized TRL mechanism in corresponding industries.

关键词

航空航天 / 研发管理 / 技术成熟度 / 双路风险控制

Key words

aviation and aerospace / R&D management / TRL / dual path risk control system

引用本文

导出引用
王刚, 陈向东, 牛欣. 基于TRL的航空航天产品研发项目协调机制研究[J]. 科研管理. 2012, 33(7): 59-66
Wang Gang, Chen Xiangdong, Niu Xin. The coordination system for R&D projects in aviationand aerospace sectors based on TRL[J]. Science Research Management. 2012, 33(7): 59-66
中图分类号: F423.3   

参考文献

[1] 朱毅麟.技术成熟度对航天器研制进度的影响[J].航天工业管理,2009(6):1-5.
[2] Ricardo Valerdi. An approach to technology risk management [J] . Engineering Systems Division Symposium. 2004 (3):29-31.
[3] 钱东,崔立,肖昌美.技术成熟度评估方法及其在水下战装备上的应用[J].鱼雷技术,2006(3):1-7.
[4] John C. Mankins. Technology Readiness Levels: A White Paper . Advanced Concepts Office, Office of Space Access and Technology. NASA. April 6, 1995.
[5] John C. Mankins .Technology readiness assessments: Aretrospective[J]. Acta Astronautica. 2009(26):1216–1223.
[6] 刘旭蓉,侯妍,艾克武. 美英武器装备项目技术成熟度评估研究[J]. 装备指挥技术学院学报,2005(12):48-52.
[7] Taner Altunok , Tanyel Cakmak. A technology readiness levels (TRLs) calculator software for systems engineering and technology management tool[J]. Advances in Engineering Software.2010(41):769 778.
[8] John C. Mankins. Technology readiness and risk assessments: A new approach [J]. Acta Astronautica. 2009(65): 1208 1215.
[9] Technology readiness levels .http://enwikipedia.org/wiki,4, May 30,2008.
[10] Definitions of technology readiness levels .http://esto.nasa.gov/files/trl_definitions.pdf,May 30,2008.
[11] Technology readiness Levels . http://203.10.217.104/attachments/trls.pdf,May 30,2008.
[12] John C. Mankins,Technology Readiness Level:A White Paper . Advanced Concepts Office, Office of Space Access and Technology. NASA. April 6,1995.
[13] 朱毅麟.技术成熟度对航天器研制进度的影响[J].航天工业管理,2009(6):1-5.

PDF(1325 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/