企业知识内化对合作中技术转移的影响研究

杨燕, 高山行

科研管理 ›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5) : 70-78.

PDF(1011 KB)
PDF(1011 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5) : 70-78.
论文

企业知识内化对合作中技术转移的影响研究

  • 杨燕, 高山行
作者信息 +

The impacts of knowledge internalization on technology transfer in collaboration

  • Yang Yan, Gao ShanXing
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

基于知识基础观和组织学习理论,提出在组织间合作关系中,中心企业的知识内化会影响来自合作伙伴的技术转移。运用中国270家参与合作的中心企业的调查数据,采用实证研究方法,探讨了中心企业知识内化对来自合作伙伴的技术转移的影响,并分析了知识复杂性和伙伴知识保护对二者关系的独立调节作用。回归分析的结果发现:知识内化作为合作学习过程的一个重要方面对技术知识转移有正向显著影响;而知识复杂性和伙伴知识保护可以增强这一正面作用,即它们在知识内化影响技术转移的过程中都起到正向调节作用。文章最后讨论了本研究对于管理实践的启示。

Abstract

Based on Knowledge-Based View (KBV) and organizational learning theory, the viewpoint that in an inter-organizational collaboration, knowledge internalization of focus firm has influences on the amount of technology transfer from its partners is proposed. On the basis of data from a survey of 270 Chinese enterprises having collaborations with partners, an empirical analysis is adopted to explore the relationship between knowledge internalization and technology transfer, as well as the independent moderating roles of knowledge complexity and partner knowledge protectiveness. The regression results show that as a main component of collaborative learning process, knowledge internalization of focus firm has significantly positive impact on the technology transfer from its partners. At the same time, both knowledge complexity and partner knowledge protectiveness positively moderate the relationship between knowledge internalization and technology transfer. Practical implications are discussed at the last.

关键词

知识内化 / 技术转移 / 知识复杂性 / 知识保护

Key words

knowledge internalization / technology transfer / knowledge complexity / knowledge protectiveness

引用本文

导出引用
杨燕, 高山行. 企业知识内化对合作中技术转移的影响研究[J]. 科研管理. 2012, 33(5): 70-78
Yang Yan, Gao ShanXing. The impacts of knowledge internalization on technology transfer in collaboration[J]. Science Research Management. 2012, 33(5): 70-78
中图分类号: F272.3   

参考文献

[1] Kale P & Singh H. Building firm capabilities through learning: The role of the alliance learning process in alliance capability and firm-level alliance success[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2007, 28: 981-1000.
[2] Conner K R & Prahalad C K. A resource-based theory of the firm: knowledge versus opportunism[J]. Organization Science, 1996, 7(5): 477-501.
[3] Wernerfelt B. A resource-based view of the firm[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1984, 5(2): 171-180.
[4] Teece D J, Pisano G & Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1997, 18(7): 509-533.
[5] Grant R M. Towards a knowledge-based theory of the firm[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1996, 17: 109-122.
[6] Nonaka I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation[J]. Organization Science, 1994, 5: 14-37.
[7] Powell W W, Koput K W & Smith-Doerr L. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1996, 41(1): 116-145.
[8] Davenport T & Prusak L. Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know[M]. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA. 1998.
[9] Gupta A K & Govindarajan V. Knowledge flows within multinational corporations[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21: 473-496.
[10] Szulanski G. Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1996, 17: 27-43.
[11] Tsai W P. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44(5): 996-1004.
[12] Lane P J & Lubatkin M. Relative capacity and interorganizational learning[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1998, 19(5): 461-477.
[13] Reagans R & McEvily B. Network structure and knowledge transfer: the effects of cohesion and range[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2003, 48(2): 240-268.
[14] Argote L, McEvily B & Reagans R. Managing knowledge in organizations: an integrative framework and review of emerging themes[J]. Management Science, 2003, 49(4): 571-582.
[15] Harbison J, & Pekar P Jr. Smart Alliance: A Practical Guide to Repeatable Success[M]. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA. 1998.
[16] Draulans J, deMan A-P, & Volberda H W. Building alliance capability: management techniques for superior alliance performance[J]. Long Range Planning, 2003, 36(2): 151-166.
[17] Simonin B L. Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1999, 10: 595-623.
[18] Argote L, McEvily B & Reagans R. Managing knowledge in organizations: an integrative framework and review of emerging themes[J]. Management Science, 2003, 49: 571-582.
[19] Simonin B L. Transfer of marketing know-how in international strategic alliances: An empirical investigation of the role and antecedents of knowledge ambiguity[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 1999, 30(3): 463-490.
[20] Kogut B & Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology[J]. Organization Science, 1992, 3(3): 383-397.
[21] Nonaka I & Takeuchi H. The Knowledge-Creating Company[M]. Oxford University Press, New York. 1995.
[22] Dougherty D. A practice-centered model of organizational renewal through product innovation[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1992, 13: 77-92.
[23] Ahuja G & Katila R. Technological acquisitions and the innovations performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study[J].. Strategic Management Journal, 2001, 22(3): 197-220.
[24] Puranam P, Singh H & Zollo M. A bird in the hand or two in the bush? Integration tradeoffs in technology-grafting acquisitions[J]. European Management Journal, 2003, 21(2): 179-184.
[25] Doz Y & Hamel G. Alliance Advantage: The Act of Creating Value through Partnering[M]. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA. 1998.
[26] Inkpen A C & Beamish P W. Knowledge, bargaining power and international joint venture instability[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1997, 22(1): 177-202.
[27] Norman P M. Knowledge acquisition, knowledge loss, and satisfaction in high technology alliances[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2004, 57: 610-619.
[28] Boisot M, Griffiths D & Moles V. The dilemma of competence: differentiation versus integration in the pursuit of learning , In Strategic Learning and Knowledge Management, Sanchez R, Heene A (eds). John Wiley: Chichester, 1997.
[29] McEvily S K, Eisenhardt K M & Prescott J E. The global acquisition, leverage, and protection of technological competencies[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2004, 25(8 9): 713-722.
[30] Oxley J E & Sampson R C. The scope and governance of international R&D alliances[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2004, 25: 723-749
[31] Pisano G. Innovation through market hierarchies, and joint ventures: Technology, strategy and collaborative arrangements in the biotechnology industry, Unpublished PhD dissertation .University of California, Berkeley: 1988.
[32] Ko D G, Kirsch L J & King W R. Antecedents for knowledge transfer from consultants to clients in enterprise system implementations[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2005, 29: 59-85.
[33] Simonin B L. An empirical investigation of the process of knowledge transfer in international strategic alliances[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2004, 35(5): 407-427.
[34] King N. Modeling the innovation process: An empirical comparison of approaches[J]. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 1992, 65: 89-100.
[35] Fiol C M & Lyles M A. Organizational learning[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1985, 10(4): 803-813.
[36] Simonin B L. The importance of collaborative know-how: an empirical test of the learning organization[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1997, 40(5): 1150-1174.

基金

本文受国家自然科学基金"自主创新战略选择对企业专利竞赛的影响研究(2008.1-2010.12)"(70772111),教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目"中国国家创新竞争力战略研究(2010.1-2012.12)"(09JZD0030)资助。

PDF(1011 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/