近年来,原始性产品创新被认为是企业获取竞争优势和区域产业升级的的关键;虽然国内企业能够认识到原始性创新的重大意义,但具体落实到创新行为上很少,导致企业原始性创新不力的根本问题是企业互搏意愿不足。而目前研究尚未明确互搏意愿的内在结构和具体绩效影响关系,从而无法解决企业创新实践中的存在认知与行为差异的"知行悖论"。本文以互搏意愿为起点,以生物技术企业为研究对象,构建"战略导向→互搏意愿→创新绩效"绩效关系模型,采用结构方程建模进行实证研究。研究发现,互搏意愿对于创新绩效作用显著,同时互搏意愿是战略导向与创新绩效的部分中介变量。该项研究结论为企业产品创新决策和提升原始性创新绩效提供切实可行的理论框架。
Abstract
Nowadays, radical product innovation is seen as the key determinant to acquire competitive advantage and regional industry updating. Although the Chinese firms are able to realize the emergence of radical innovation, due to lack of the Willingness To Cannibalize (WTC), innovative behaviors in organizations are still seldom in firms. Current researches have no cleared cut on the affected relationship between the internal structure of WTC and actual performance, therefore the solution to the dissonance between recognition and behaviors so-called paradox of recognition and behaviors is unable to given. By taking the concept of WTC as the start point, based on the correlative theoretical research on strategic orientation, WTC, and radical product innovation performance, an integrated conceptual framework about the mechanism of Radical Product Innovation Management (RPIM) is proposed. Corresponding variables and measurement method are chosen on the basis of the conceptual framework. In order to verify the hypotheses of research, a major survey of 198 top manager teams from biotechnology industry in Zhejiang Province of China is included. Structural equation model and reliability tests are used for data analysis which supports the interaction mechanism of strategic orientation, WTC, and innovation performance in RPIM. The results provide empirical evidence and suggestions for improving firms' product innovation capability through WTC.
关键词
互博意愿 /
战略导向 /
创新绩效 /
原始性产品 /
结构方程模型
Key words
WTC /
strategic orientation /
innovation performance /
radical product /
structural equation model
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Montalvo, C. What triggers change and innovation?[J]. Technovation, 2006, 26(3): 312-323.
[2] Zhou, K. Z., Li, C. B. How strategic orientations influence the building of dynamic capability in emerging economies[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2010, 63(3): 224-231.
[3] 亚当·杰夫,乔希·勒纳.创新及其不满:专利体系对创新与进步的危害及对策[M].罗建平,兰花译.中国人民大学出版社,2007.
[4] O'Connor, G. C., DeMartino, R. Organizing for Radical Innovation: An Exploratory Study of the Structural Aspects of RI Management Systems in Large Established Firms[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2006, 23(6): 475-97.
[5] Garcia, R.& Calantone, R. A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review[J]. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2002, 19(2):110-132.
[6] Salomo, S., Gemünden, H. G. & Leifer, R. Call for Papers Special Issue: Organizational Competencies Supporting Radical Innovation[J]. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2004, 21(3): 3-4.
[7] Hyland, P. & Beckett, R. Engendering an innovative culture and maintaining operational balance[J]. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 2005, 12(3): 336-352.
[8] 罗霞,鲁若愚.产品更新的财务特点及其净现值法的优化[J].研究与发展管理,2003(6):32-37.
[9] 余浩.基于互搏意愿的颠覆性产品创新管理机制研究 .博士学位论文,浙江大学,2008.
[10] Copulsky, W. Cannibalism in the marketplace[J]. Journal of Marketing, 1976, 40(4): 103-105.
[11] Chandy, R. K. & Tellis, G. J. Organizing for radical product innovation: the overlooked role of willingness to cannibalize[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1998, 35(4): 474-487.
[12] Jeong, E. Divisionalization, product cannibalization and product location choice: evidence from the u.s. automobile industry . Texas A&M University, ProQuest Information and Learning Company, December 2003.
[13] Nijssen, E. J., Hillebrand, B. & Vermeulen, P. A. M. et al Exploring product and service innovation similarities and differences[J]. International Joural of Research in Marketing, 2006, 23(3): 241-251.
[14] Gatignon H. & Xuereb, J. M. Strategic Orientation of the Firm and New Product Performance[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1997, 34(2): 77-90.
[15] 余浩.企业战略导向与技术创新绩效的实证研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2010(9):61-65.
[16] Govindarajan, V. & Kopalle, P. K. Disruptiveness of innovations: measurement and an assessment of reliability and validity[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2006, 27(2): 189-199.
[17] Jaworski B J, Kohli A K. 1993. Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences[J]. Journal of Marketing, 57 (7): 53-70.
[18] Nijssen, E. J., Hillebrand, B. & Vermeulen, P. A. M. Unraveling willingness to cannibalize: a closer look at the barrier to radical innovation[J]. Technovation, 2005, 25(12): 1400-1409.
[19] Deshpande R, Farley J. U. 1996. Understanding market orientation: A prospectively designed Meta-Analysis of Three market orientation scales[M]. Marketing Science Institute Working Paper No. 96-125. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
[20] Slater S F, Narver J C. 1998. Customer-led and Market-oriented: let's not confuse the two[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 19 (10):1001-1006.
[21] 赵明剑,司春林,佟石等.企业内部价值网络与技术创新[J].科技导报,2003(10):15-20.
[22] 黄芳铭.结构方程模式:理论与应用[M].北京:中国税务出版社,2005.
[23] 童亮.基于跨组织合作联结的复杂产品系统创新知识管理机制研究 .博士学位论文,浙江大学,2006.
基金
国家教育人文社科规划项目"企业互搏意愿的结构维度与产品创新绩效关系研究"(10YJA6301191)资助。
PDF(1177 KB)
