论文从主从博弈的视角,将高新技术企业运营的基础单位知识团队作为研究对象,运用博弈中的主方和从方来刻画知识团队中成员间知识水平的差异,通过分析各方投入、绩效分配、安全系数等对知识分享的影响,建立起高新技术企业知识团队中知识分享决策的主从博弈微观模型,并进行仿真分析,探索高新技术企业知识分享过程中的内在微观机理及其影响机制。论文研究发现成员的知识分享绩效分配系数与知识分享投入正相关,知识分享安全指数对知识分享投入与知识分享收益均有积极的影响;知识团队中知识分享前提条件是知识优势方的绩效分配系数应足够大,且该绩效分配系数与所有跟随者的绩效分配系数之和的比值应大于知识转化系数;研究结论为高新技术企业的知识分享策略制定提供决策参考。
Abstract
From the perspective of Stackelberg games, the micro-mechanism of knowledge sharing in high-tech enterprises is researched and by taking the knowledge teams as the research object, the leader and the follower are used to describe the different levels of knowledge teams' member. By analyzing the effect of all inputs, performance allocation, and safety coefficient on knowledge sharing, a Stackelberg game model of decision-making in knowledge sharing is established and the simulation analysis is conducted to explore high-tech enterprises in the process of knowledge sharing micro-mechanism. The results show that firstly, the member's performance partition coefficient is a positively correlated with the input in knowledge sharing. Secondly, the safety coefficient has a positive impact on input and earning in knowledge sharing. There is a prerequisite that performance partition coefficient of the leaders should be large enough for entive knowledge teams. At the same time, the ratio of performance partition coefficient between the leaders and all the followers should be larger than knowledge conversion coefficient. These conclusions could provide the reference to decision makers for the knowledge sharing strategies of high-tech enterprises.
关键词
高新技术企业 /
知识团队 /
知识分享 /
主从博弈
Key words
high-tech enterprise /
knowledge team /
knowledge sharing /
Stackelberg game
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 芮明杰、陈娟. 高技术企业知识体系的构建与管理[M], 上海财经大学出版社. 2006.
[2] 林东清. 知识管理理论与实务[M],北京:电子工业出版社,2005.
[3] Stewart Thornhill. Knowledge, innovation and firm performance in high-and low-technology regimes [J], Journal of Business Venturing, Vol21, NO. 5, 2006: 687-703.
[4] 托马斯·H·达文波特.劳伦斯·普鲁萨克. 营运知识:工商企业的知识管理[M] 南昌:江西教育出版社,1999.Carl F. Fey, Patrick Furu. Top management incentive compensation and knowledge sharing in multinational corporations [J], Strategic Management Journal, Vol 29, No 12, 2008:1301-1323.
[5] Sheng Wang, Raymond A. Noe. Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research[J], Human Resource Management Review 20 (2010) :115-131
[6] Enno Siemsen. Essays on knowledge sharing , Doctor's Dissertations University of North Carolina At Chapel Hill , 2005.
[7] Cabrera, ángel. Cabrera, Elizabeth F. Knowledge-sharing dilemmas[J], Organization Studies, Vol 23, No 5, 2002:687-710.
[8] 常涛,廖建桥.团队性绩效考核对知识共享的影响模型研究[J]. 科研管理,2011,32(1): 111-121.
[9] 王建宇,樊治平,姜艳萍,胡国东. 合作知识创新中基于Stackelberg博弈的资源分享决策模型[J], 中国管理科学, 13(3):2005:84-88.
[10] Haresh Gurnani, Yigal Gerchak. Coordination in decentralized assembly systems with uncertain component yields[J], European Journal of Operational Research, Vol 176, No. 3, 2007:1559-1576
[11] A. Gupta, E. Mattarelli, Satwik. S, J. Broschak. Use of collaborative technologies and knowledge sharing in co-located and distributed teams: Towards the 24-h knowledge factory[J], The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol18, No. 3, 2009:147-161.
[12] Samaddar S,Kadilyala S.An Analysis of Interorganizational Resource Sharing Decisions in Collaborative Knowledge Creation[J].European Journal of Operational Research. 2006. (170):192-210.
基金
教育部人文社科基金(编号08JA630093,起止时间2009.01-2011.12),教育部博士点博导类基金(编号20100191110039,起止时间2011.01-2013.12)。
PDF(1416 KB)
