企业间关系行为对创新柔性的影响研究

科研管理 ›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3): 1-10,17.

• 论文 • 下一篇

企业间关系行为对创新柔性的影响研究

宋华¹, 王岚²

1. 中国人民大学商学院,北京 100872;
2. 北京语言大学国际商学院,北京 100083

收稿日期:2008-12-31 修回日期:2010-10-30 出版日期:2012-03-27 发布日期:2012-03-24
作者简介:宋华(1969-),男(汉),湖北武汉人,博士,中国人民大学商学院教授,博士生导师,主要研究方向为供应链物流管理、战略管理。
王岚(1980-),女(汉), 辽宁盘锦人,博士,北京语言大学国际商学院讲师,主要研究方向为供应链物流管理、战略管理。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助面上项目(70772088)、国家自然科学基金资助青年科学基金项目(71002009)及中国社会科学基金资助项目(08BJY078)。

The impact of relational behavior between enterprises on innovation flexibility

Song Hua¹, Wang Lan²

1. School of Business, Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872, China;
2. School of International Business, Beijing Language and Culture University,Beijing 100083, China

Received:2008-12-31 Revised:2010-10-30 Online:2012-03-27 Published:2012-03-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于资源依赖理论和权变理论,本文构建了开发型关系和利用型关系对创新柔性影响的理论模型;并将环境竞争性和环境动态性作为调节变量,来探索外部环境如何影响关系类型对创新柔性的影响作用。通过对194家企业的实证研究,研究结果表明利用型关系和开发型关系均有利于提升企业创新柔性;并进一步发现环境动态性正向调节开发型关系对创新柔性的影响,而环境竞争性负向调节开发型关系对创新柔性的影响,正向调节利用型关系对创新柔性的影响。说明环境竞争性强,减弱企业通过开发型关系来提升创新柔性,企业更多地采用利用型关系提升创新柔性;环境动态性强,增强企业通过开发型关系来提升创新柔性。

关键词: 开发型关系, 利用型关系, 创新柔性, 环境竞争性, 环境动态性

Abstract: Based on resource dependency theory and contingency theory, how various types of tie portfolios, i.e., exploratory and exploitative relationship could be beneficial to innovation flexibility is examined. Environmental competitiveness and dynamics are combined as moderators, for the how the extraneous environmental conditions have influence on the efficiency of exploratory relationship and exploitative relationship is explored. By using survey data collected from a sample of 194 firms in mainland China, it is demonstrated that exploratory and exploitative relationship are both positively related to the firms innovation flexibility. It is also found that the positive relationship between them is moderated by the level of competitiveness and dynamics in their environments. Environment dynamics positively moderates the relationship between exploratory relationship and innovation flexibility. Environment competitiveness negatively moderates the relationship between exploratory relationship and innovation flexibility; on the contrary, it positively moderates the relationship between exploitative relationship and innovation flexibility. The result means that with an increase of competitiveness, firms will employ less exploratory relationship but more exploitative relationship to enhance innovation flexibility. With an increase of dynamics, firms will employ more exploratory relationship to enhance innovation flexibility.

Key words: exploratory relationship, exploitative relationship, innovation flexibility, environment competitiveness, environment dynamics

中图分类号:

F273

宋华, 王岚. 企业间关系行为对创新柔性的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2012, 33(3): 1-10,17.

Song Hua, Wang Lan. The impact of relational behavior between enterprises on innovation flexibility[J]. Science Research Management, 2012, 33(3): 1-10,17.

参考文献

[1] March J G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning[J]. Organization Science 1991, 2(1):71-87. [2] Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2003, 28: 238-256. [3] Burgelman, R. A. Fading memories: A process theory of strategic business exit in dynamic environments [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1994, 39: 24-56. [4] Stuart T. Network positions and propensities to collaborate: an investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1998, 43(3): 668-698. [5] Slater S F, Narver J C. Market organization and the learning organization [J]. J Mark 1995, 59: 63-74. [6] Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997, 42: 1-34. [7] Lavie, D. & Rosenkopf, L. Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2006, 49(4): 797-818. [8] Vickery, S., Calantone, R. and Dröge, C. Supply chain flexibility: an empirical study [J]. The Journal of Supply Chain Management, 1999, 35 (1): 16-24. [9] Stuart T. Network positions and propensities to collaborate: an investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1998, 43(3): 668-698. [10] Joao Mota, Luis M. de Castro, Relationship portfolios andcapability development:Cases from the moulds industry [J]. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management. 2005,11: 42-54 [11] Araujo, L., Easton, G., Strategy: where is the pattern? [J]. Organization science. 1996, 3 (3): 361-383. [12] 李永峰, 司春林. 合作创新战略联盟中企业间相互信任问题的实证研究[J]. 研究发展与管理.2007, 19(6): 52-60 [13] Danny, P. C., Geoffrey, H., & Onno, O. The determinants of relational governance and performance: How to manage business relationships? [J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2003, 32: 703-716 [14] Henderson R, Clark K. Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly 1990, 35: 9-30. [15] Dougherty D. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms [J]. Organization Science, 1992, 3(2): 179-202. [16] 林筠, 杨雪, 李随成. 隐性知识交流和转移与企业技术创新关系的实证研究[J].科研管理,2008(5). [17] Matusik, S., & Hill, C. The utilization of contingent work, knowledge creation and competitive advantage [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1998, 23 (4): 680-98. [18] Miller, D. & Friesen, P. H. Strategy-Making and Environment: The Third Link [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1983, 4: 221. [19] Dess, G.G., & Beard, D.W. Dimensions of organizational task environments [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1984, 29: 52-73. [20] Jansen, J. J. P., F. A. J. Van Den Bosch, H. W. Volberda. Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter? [J] Academy. Management Journal. 2005, 48 999-1015. [21] Lumpkin, G. T., G. G. Dess. Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle [J]. Journal of Business Venturing. 2001,16: 429-451. [22] Narasimhan, R. and Das, A. Manufacturing agility and supply chain management practices [J]. Production and Inventory Management, 1999, 40(1):4-11. [23] Jansen, J.J.P., Van den Bosch, F.A.J., Volberda, H.W. Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators [J]. November 2006, Management Science, 52(11):1661-1674 [24] Rothaermel, F.T., & Deeds, D.L. 2004. Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 25(3): 201-221. [25] Bengtsson, Maria; S?lvell, ?rjan, Climate of Competition: Clusters and Innovative Performance. Scandinavian Journal of Management[J], 2004, 20(3): 225-244 [26] Claro Pimentel. D., G. Hagelaar and O. Omta. The determinants of relational governance and performance: How to manage business relationships [J]. Industrial Marketing Management. 2003, 32:703-716 [27] Achrol, R.S., Stern, L.W., Environment Determinants of Decision-Making Uncertainty in Marketing Channels [J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1988, 25: 36-50. [28] Rowley, T., Behrens, D. & Krackhardt, D. Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21(3): 369-386. [29] DeWitt T., Giunipero C.L., & Melton L. H. Clusters and supply chain management: the Amish experience [J]. International Journal of Physical, 2006, 35(4): 289-308.

企业间关系行为对创新柔性的影响研究

The impact of relational behavior between enterprises on innovation flexibility

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	孟凡生徐野赵刚. “智能+”对制造企业创新绩效的影响机制研究[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(9): 109-118.
[2]	吴言波邵云飞. 联盟组合重构有利于合作创新绩效吗？[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(9): 103-111.
[3]	张秀娥李梦莹. 创业激情对创业成功的作用机制研究[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(9): 120-126.
[4]	任旭刘佳. 魅力型领导对项目团队内知识转移影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(6): 150-158.
[5]	张永云, 郭鹏利, 张生太. 失败学习与商业模式创新关系：知识管理与环境动态性的影响[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(11): 90-98.
[6]	梁阜李树文耿新. 基于企业生命周期的人力资本最优配置—资源转化的视角[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(4): 239-249.
[7]	赵忠伟，李睿，朱冰洁. 组织柔性对中小型高科技企业成长影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(7): 247-256.
[8]	孟凡生赵刚. 创新柔性对制造企业智能化转型影响机制研究[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(4): 74-82.
[9]	李卫宁占靖宇吕源. 变革型领导行为、战略柔性与企业绩效[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(3): 94-103.
[10]	郭惠玲许杭军董保宝郭朝阳. 垂直与水平网络对企业创新绩效的影响差异研究——基于CAS理论逻辑[J]. 科研管理, 2018, 39(7): 59-68.
[11]	程聪，王立丰，钟慧慧，陈盈. 业务关联、技术匹配与企业国际竞争力：跨国并购的视角[J]. 科研管理, 2018, 39(10): 90-99.
[12]	尹苗苗李秉泽. 新企业市场导向对网络关系构建的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2017, 38(8): 83-91.
[13]	田宇杨艳玲. 基于物流企业的服务创新研究：互动导向视角[J]. 科研管理, 2016, 37(2): 116-123.
[14]	何霞苏晓华. 环境动态性下新创企业战略联盟与组织合法性研究——基于组织学习视角[J]. 科研管理, 2016, 37(2): 90-97.
[15]	陈力田. 企业技术创新能力对环境适应性重构的实证研究—基于376家高技术企业的证据[J]. 科研管理, 2015, 36(8): 1-9.