以广东省部产学研合作为背景,运用DEA-Tobit两步法,对广东省企业产学研合作创新效率及其影响因素进行了研究。研究发现,广东省企业产学研合作的综合技术效率不足,其主要原因来自于纯技术无效率。进一步对企业产学研合作创新效率影响因素的实证检验表明,企业吸收能力、政府对企业产学研合作的资助力度、企业规模和企业研发战略的开放度是影响企业产学研合作创新效率的重要因素。
Abstract
Based on the background of university-industry collaboration in Guangdong Province, the innovation efficiency of enterprise university-industry collaboration and its influencing factors is investigated using the Data Enrelopment Analysis(DEA)-Tobit two-step method. The results show that enterprise university-industry collaboration is inefficient in Guangdong Province due to the pure technical inefficiency. Furthermore, according to the empirical research on the influential factors of enterprise university-industry collaboration, the absorptive capacity of enterprises, government fund, enterprise-scale, and the openness of R&D strategy are important factors to affect the efficiency of enterprise university-industry collaboration.
关键词
产学研合作 /
创新效率 /
DEA /
Tobit回归
Key words
university-industry cooperation /
innovation efficiency /
DEA /
Tobit regression
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Hoang, H., Rothaermel, F.T. The effect of general and partner-specific alliance experience on joint R&D project performance [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2005.48(2): 332-345.
[2] Hiroyuki Okamuro, Determinants of successful R&D cooperation in Japanese small businesses: The impact of organizational and contractual characteristics [J]. Research Policy, 2007. 36 (10): 1529-1544.
[3] 李栋华, 顾晓敏, 任爱莲. 知识来源与企业创新:基于DEA的研究[J]. 科研管理, 2010,31(2): 42-48.
[4] 朱南, 卓贤, 董屹. 关于我国国有商业银行效率的实证分析与改革策略[J]. 管理世界, 2004(2): 18-27.
[5] 涂俊, 吴贵生. 基于DEA Tobit两步法的区域农业创新系统评价及分析[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2006(4): 136-145.
[6] H. J. Love, S. Roper. Location and network effects on innovation success: evidence for UK, German and Irish manufacturing plants [J]. Research policy, 2001, 30(4): 643-661.
[7] Sohn, Y.G. Joo and H.K. Han. Structural equation model for the evaluation of national funding on R&D project of SMEs in consideration with MBNQA criteria [J], Evaluation and Program Planning, 2007. 30(1): 10-20.
[8] FM Hsu, CC Hsueh. Measuring relative efficiency of government-sponsored R&D projects: A three-stage approach [J]. Evaluation and program planning, 2009. 32(2): 178-186.
[9] Bekkers, R.N.A., Bodas de Araujo Freitas, I.M. Performance of university-industry collaborations, qualitative and quantitative evidence from the Netherlands . Proceedings of the 7th Biennial International Conference of University, Industry & Government Linkages (Triple Helix VII), 2009, Glasgow, Scotland.
[10] Shaker A. Zahra, Gerard George. Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension [J], Academy of Management Review. 2002. 27 (2): 185-203.
[11] Toshihiro Kodama. The role of intermediation and absorptive capacity in facilitating university-industry linkages-An empirical study of TAMA in Japan [J]. Research Policy, 2008. 37(8): 1224-1240.
[12] Cassiman Bruno, Veugelers Reinhilde. In search of complementarily in innovation strategy: internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition [J]. Management Science, 2006. 52(1): 68-82.
[13] Katila RA. Ahuja G. Something Old, Something New: A Longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction [J]. Academy of Management Journal. 2002. 45(6): 1183-1194.
[14] Santoro M.D., Chakrabarti A.K. Firm size and technology centrality in industry-university interactions [J]. Research Policy, 2002, 31(7): 1163-1180.
[15] Rothwell R., Dodgson M. External linkages and innovations in small and medium-sized enterprises [J]. R&D Management, 1991, 21(2): 125-138.
[16] 王晓明. 我国工业企业自主创新状况调查及政策建议[J]. 经济管理, 2008, 13(2): 17-21.
[17] 陈钰芬, 陈劲. 开放度对企业技术创新绩效的影响[J]. 科学学研究, 2008, 26(2): 421-426.
基金
国家自然科学基金项目(No:70903022,70973038,2010-2013年),教育部人文社会科学项目(No:09YJC630084,2010-2013年),华南理工大学中央高校基本业务经费项目(No:2009ZM0312,2010-2012年)。
PDF(882 KB)
