以燃料电池这一新兴产业为例,通过对高被引专利技术形成特征的考察,提炼后发国家新兴产业发展的政策建议。研究发现,新兴产业高被引专利是发明者之间相互合作的产物,知识来源更依赖于科学文献,而专利授权数量占优的在位企业并未拥有高被引专利所有权。进一步指出,后发国家新兴产业发展虽有"机会窗口"但无"先天优势",本土企业必须主动嵌入全球研发网络,高度重视与新兴产业发展密切相关的基础研究,积极参与知识产权全球布局和标准制定。
Abstract
The fuel cell industry as a subfield of emerging industry is selected as a research object. Based on the investigation on the formation characteristics of highly cited patents, some policy recommendations are refined for the development of emerging industry in the late-comer country. Empirical results indicate that highly cited patents are the product of mutual cooperation between inventors, and the knowledge sources of highly cited patents are more dependent on scientific literature, meanwhile, the dominant companies which have more patents do not have the ownership of highly cited patent. Furthermore, the development of emerging industry in late-comer country has a window of opportunity but not congenital advantage, the local firms of late-comer country must actively embed in the global R&D network, pay more attention to the basic research, and voluntary participate in global distribution of intellectual property right and standard formulation.
关键词
高被引专利 /
新兴产业 /
专利挖掘 /
Logistic回归
Key words
highly cited patent /
emerging industry /
patent mining /
Logistic regression
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Porter, M. E., 1990, The Competitive Advantage of Nations[M]. New York: Free Press.
[2] Murat Bengisu, T. & Ramzi Nekhili. Forecasting Emerging Technologies with the Aid of Science & Technology Databases [J].Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2006, 73 (7):.835-844.
[3] Raija Koivisto, Nina Wessberg, Annele Eerola, Toni Ahlqvist, Sirkku Kivisaari,Jouko Myllyoja & Minna Halonen. Integrating Future-oriented Technology Analysis and Risk Assessment Methodologies[J].Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2009, 76 (9):1163-1176.
[4] Ahuja, G. & Lampert, C.M. Entrepreneurship in Large Corporations: a Longitudinal Study of How Established Firms Create Breakthrough Inventions[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2001, 22(6):521-543.
[5] Gregory F. Nemet. Demand-pull, Technology-push, and Government-led Incentives for Non-incremental Technical change [J].Research Policy, 2009, 38 (5):700-709.
[6] Wilfred Schoenmakers & Geert Duysters.The Technological Origins of Radical Inventions [J]. Research Policy, 2010, 39 (7):1051-1058.
[7] Trajtenberg, M. A Penny for Your Quotes: Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations [J]. Rand Journal of Economics, 1990, 21 (1):172-181.
[8] Harhoff, D., Narin, F., Scherer, M.& Vopel, K. Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Inventions[J].Review of Economics & Statistics, 1999,81 (3):511-515.
[9] Henderson, R. Underinvestment and Incompetence as responses to Radical Innovation: Evidence from the Photolithographic Alignment Equipment Industry [J].Rand Journal of Economics, 1993, 24(5):248-270.
[10] Christensen, CM. The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail [M]. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 1997.
[11] M.Lourdes Sosa. Application-Specific R&D Capabilities and the Advantage of Incumbents: Evidence from the Anticancer Drug Market[J]. Management Science, 2009, 8(55):1409-1422.
[12] Carlota Perez. Technological revolutions and Techno-economic paradigms[J].Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2010, 34(1):185-202.
[13] 王刚波,官建成.纳米科学与技术之间的联系:基于学术型发明人的分析[J]. 中国软科学, 2009(12):71-79.
[14] Rosenkopf, L. & Nerkar, A. Beyond Local Search: Boundary Spanning, Exploration, and Impact in the Optical Disk Industry[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2001, 22(3):287-306.
[15] Lin Jiang, Justin Tan and Marie Thursby. Incumbent Firm Invention in Emerging Fields: Evidence from the Semiconductor Industry [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2011, 32(1):55-75.
[16] Dahlin, K.B.& Behrens, D.M. When Is an Invention really Radical? Defining and measuring Technological Radicalness[J].Research Policy, 2005,34 (5):1167-1183.
[17] Reinhard Haupt, Martin Kloyer & Marcus Lange. Patent Indicators for the Technology Life Cycle Development[J].Research Policy, 2007, 36 (2):387-398.
[18] 邓可斌,丁 重.中国为什么缺乏创造性破坏?——基于上市公司特质信息的经验证据[J].经济研究,2010(6):66-78.
[19] 柳卸林,何郁冰. 基础研究是中国产业核心技术创新的源泉[J].中国软科学, 2011(4):104-117.
基金
国家自然科学基金重点项目"全球化,突破性创新与产业领导力研究(起止时间:2010.01-2013.12,批准号:70932001)。
PDF(1425 KB)
