网络嵌入性对企业选择合作技术创新伙伴的影响

郑登攀, 党兴华

科研管理 ›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1) : 154-160.

PDF(1102 KB)
PDF(1102 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1) : 154-160.
论文

网络嵌入性对企业选择合作技术创新伙伴的影响

  • 郑登攀, 党兴华
作者信息 +

The impact of network embeddedness on the partner selection of cooperative technological innovation

  • Zheng Dengpan, Dang Xinghua
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

利用QAP回归方法分析了网络嵌入性(包括关系嵌入性和结构嵌入性)对企业选择合作技术创新伙伴的影响。Cantner(2006)认为德国耶拿地区企业间科学家流动后产生的个人关系和企业间以往的合作经验都会对企业选择合作技术创新伙伴产生重要影响。本研究采用我国西安高新区企业的调研数据对此进行了分析,利用了网络嵌入性理论中的概念,将Cantner研究中的前一因素称为结构嵌入性(负责专利发明的科学家、工程师等作为第三方中介人),后一因素称为关系嵌入性(指企业间以往的合作经验)。研究结果表明:在我国西安高新区企业中,关系嵌入性对企业选择合作技术创新伙伴的影响并不明显,而结构嵌入性对企业选择合作技术创新伙伴的影响较大。

Abstract

The method of QAP is used to analyze the impact of network embeddedness, i.e. relational embeddedness and structural embeddedness, on the partner selection of cooperative technological innovation. Cantner (2006) considered that both the personal relation generated by the mobilization of scientists and the past experience of cooperation have a great impact on the partner selection of cooperative technological innovation. The topic based on the data collected from the firms in Xi'an High-tech Zone are analyzed, and the previous factor is defined as structural embeddedness, namely, the scientists and engineers who are in charge of patents act as three party intermediates, and the latter factor is defined as relational embeddedness, that is, the past experience of cooperation. The result indicates that the impact of relational embeddedness on the partner selection of cooperative technological innovation is not quite obvious. Nevertheless, the structural embeddedness has a greater effect on the partner selection of cooperative technological innovation.

关键词

网络嵌入性 / 企业 / 合作技术创新 / 伙伴选择

Key words

network embeddedness / firm / cooperative technological innovation / partner selection

引用本文

导出引用
郑登攀, 党兴华. 网络嵌入性对企业选择合作技术创新伙伴的影响[J]. 科研管理. 2012, 33(1): 154-160
Zheng Dengpan, Dang Xinghua. The impact of network embeddedness on the partner selection of cooperative technological innovation[J]. Science Research Management. 2012, 33(1): 154-160
中图分类号: F273.11   

参考文献

[1] Kuen-Hung Tsai.Collaborative networks and product innovation performance:Toward a contingency perspective[J].Research Policy, 2009,38(5):765-778. [2] Joel A.C., Robin Cowan. Network-independent partner selection and the evolution of innovation network[J]. Management science,2010,56(11):2094-2110. [3] Cantner W, Holger Graf.The network of innovators in Jena:An application of social network analysis[J]. Research Policy.2006,35(4):463 480. [4] Cowan R. et al.. Bilateral Collaboration and the Emergence of Innovation Networks[J]. Management Science.2007,53(7):1051–1067. [5] 刘军.QAP:测量"关系"之间关系的一种方法[J].社会,2007,27(4):164-174. [6] Brigitte Gay, Bernard Dousset.Innovation and network structural dynamics:Study of the alliance network of a major sector of the biotechnology industry[J]. Research Policy,2005,34(10):1457-1475. [7] Cowan, R., Jonard, N.. Network structure and the diffusion of knowledge[J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,2004,28 (8):1557-1575. [8] Lanjouw, J.O., Schankerman, M.. Patent quality and research productivity:measuring innovation with multiple indicators[J]. The Economic Journal,2004,114(495):441-465. [9] Sorenson, O.. Social networks and industrial geography[J]. Journal of Evolutionary Economics,2003,13(5):513-527.

基金

"基于耦合关系的技术创新网络核心企业(集团)形成机理及实证研究"(国家自然科学基金:70672089);"基于知识权力的技术创新网络治理机理及实现研究"(国家自然科学基金:70972051);"陕西省重点学科建设专项资金资助项目"支持。


PDF(1102 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/