权变视角下企业网络位置与产品创新绩效关系研究

科研管理 ›› 2012, Vol. ›› Issue (8): 137-145.

权变视角下企业网络位置与产品创新绩效关系研究

彭新敏^1,2, 吴丽娟¹, 王琳¹

1. 浙江万里学院, 浙江宁波 315100;
2. 中国社会科学院财经战略研究院, 北京 100836

收稿日期:2011-10-27 修回日期:2012-07-02 出版日期:2012-08-27 发布日期:2012-08-15
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(71102003); 国家软科学研究计划项目(2011GXQ4D085); 中国博士后科学基金项目(20110490511); 浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题(12JCGL23YB); 浙江省社科规划"之江青年课题研究"成果(11ZJQN092YB)。

The relationship between inter-firm network position and product innovationperformance with the contingent view

Peng Xinmin^1,2, Wu Lijuan¹, Wang Lin¹

1. Zhejiang Wanli University, Ningbo 315100, China;
2. National Academy of Economic Strategy, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100836, China

Received:2011-10-27 Revised:2012-07-02 Online:2012-08-27 Published:2012-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 当前对企业选择网络中心位置还是网络中介位置进行产品创新仍存有争论,而同时引入技术战略导向和市场动态性两个调节变量分析两种网络位置对产品创新绩效的权变效应有可能破解这个难题。通过对浙江省208家制造企业的实证研究发现,两种网络位置对产品创新绩效都有正向影响,且企业技术战略导向越高,这种正向效应越显著;市场动态性越高,网络中介位置对产品绩效的正向效应越显著,但市场动态性对网络中心位置与产品创新绩效关系负向调节作用并不显著。研究结论不仅明确了不同网络位置发挥效用的具体情境,也为企业选择合适的网络位置进行产品创新提供了启示。

关键词: 权变视角, 网络位置, 产品创新, 技术战略导向, 市场动态性

Abstract: At present, there are debates on that in order to conduct product innovation, either prominent network position or entrepreneurial network position should be selected. It is possible to settle the puzzle if two moderate variables, that is, technology-oriented strategy and market dynamics, are introduced to analyze the contingent effect on innovation performance caused by these two network positions. Through the empirical study on 208 manufacturing firms in Zhejiang Province, China, it is found that these two network positions both have positive effects on product innovation performance, and the higher the firm's technology-oriented strategy is, the more significant the positive effects will be. The higher the market dynamics is, the more significant positive effects on product innovation performance the entrepreneurial network position will have, however, the negative moderate effects of market dynamics on the relationship between prominent network position and product innovation performance is insignificant. The conclusions not only clarify the detailed context for the utility of different network position, but also provide implications on how to choose appropriate network position for conducting product innovation of firms.

Key words: contingent view, network position, product innovation, technology-oriented strategy, market dynamics

中图分类号:

F270.2

彭新敏, 吴丽娟, 王琳. 权变视角下企业网络位置与产品创新绩效关系研究[J]. 科研管理, 2012, (8): 137-145.

Peng Xinmin, Wu Lijuan, Wang Lin. The relationship between inter-firm network position and product innovationperformance with the contingent view[J]. Science Research Management, 2012, (8): 137-145.

参考文献

[1] Tsai, W. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44(5): 996-1004.
[2] 彭新敏. 企业网络对技术创新绩效的作用机制研究:利用性-探索性学习的中介效应. 杭州:浙江大学博士学位论文, 2009.
[3] Podolny, J. Networks as pipes and prisms of the market [J]. American Journal of Sociology, 2001, 107(1): 33-60
[4] 姜源林. 网络位置、环境特征和创新战略导向的匹配研究——基于全球制造网络的实证分析. 杭州:浙江大学硕士学位论文, 2009.
[5] Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W. & Smith-Doerr, L. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1996, 41(1): 116-145.
[6] Burt, R. S. Structural holes: The social structure of competition [M]. Boston, MA: Harvard Universtiy Press, 1992.
[7] Koka, B. R. & Prescott, J. E. Designing alliance networks: The influence of network position, environmental change, and strategy on firm performance [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2008, 29(6): 639-661.
[8] 彭新敏. 权变视角下的网络联结与组织绩效关系研究 [J]. 科研管理,2009, 30(3): 47-55.
[9] Adler, P. Technology strategy: a guide to the literature [M]. Greenwich, JA I Press, 1989.
[10] Miller, D. Relating Porter's business strategies to environment and structure: Analysis and performance implications [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1988, 31(2): 280-308.
[11] Rowley, T., Behrens, D., & Krackhardt, D. Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21(3): 369-386.
[12] Larson, A. Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange relationships [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1992, 37(1): 76-104.
[13] Uzzi, B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997, 42(1): 37-69.
[14] Ibarra, H. Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement: Determinants of technical and administrative roles [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1993, 36(3): 471-501.
[15] Gnyawali, D. R. & Madhavan, R. Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: a structural embededness perspective [J]. Academy of Management Review, 2001, 26(3): 431-445.
[16] Miles, R. & Snow, C. Organizational strategy, structure, and process [M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
[17] McDaniel, S. W. & Kolari, J. W. Marketing strategy implications of the Miles and Snow strategic typology [J]. Journal of Marketing, 1987, 51(4): 19-30.
[18] Tiwana, A. Do bridging ties complement strong ties? An empirical examination of alliance ambidexterity [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2008, 29(3): 251-272.
[19] 高展军, 李垣. 战略网络结构对企业技术创新的影响研究 [J]. 科学学研究, 2006, 24(3): 474-479.
[20] Gulati, R., Nohria, N. & Zaheer A. Strategic networks [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21(3): 203-215.
[21] Achrol, R. S. Evolution of marketing organization: New forum for turbulent environments [J]. Journal of Marketing, 1991, 55(October): 77-93.
[22] Smith, P. G. & Reinertsen, D. G. Developing products in half the time [M]. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhol, 1991.
[23] Podsakoff, P. M. & Organ, D. W. Self- reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects [J]. Journal of Management, 1986, 12( 4): 531-544.