我国地方政府住房保障绩效评估指标体系研究 —基于

科研管理 ›› 2012, Vol. ›› Issue (6): 154-160.

• 论文 • 上一篇

我国地方政府住房保障绩效评估指标体系研究 —基于"目标—标杆"二维视角

高义¹, 戚巍², 易勇³

1. 中国科学技术大学管理学院, 安徽合肥 230026;
2. 中国科学技术大学高等教育研究所, 安徽合肥 230026;
3. 中国科学技术大学公共事务学院, 安徽合肥 230026

收稿日期:2011-12-16 修回日期:2012-03-09 出版日期:2012-06-27 发布日期:2012-06-20

The performance evaluation index system of housing security of China’s local government—Based on a two-dimensional perspective of objective and benchmarking

Gao Yi¹, Qi Wei², Yi Yong³

1. Cool of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China;
2. Institute of Higher Education, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China;
3. School of Public Affairs, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China

Received:2011-12-16 Revised:2012-03-09 Online:2012-06-27 Published:2012-06-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 住房保障已成为当前我国公共治理的突出问题,但系统全面的地方政府住房保障绩效评估指标体系尚未构建。从公共部门绩效评估基本理论出发,提出"目标——标杆"二维绩效评估思路,开发设计包括2个一级指标、4个二级指标、18个三级指标的评估体系,给出指标赋值与计算方法,并进一步通过实例演示验证评估方法的科学可操作性。希冀从方法工具层面对推进我国住房保障工作具有一定价值。

关键词: 住房保障, 绩效评估, 指标体系, 地方政府

Abstract: Housing security has become a prominent problem in the public governance; however a comprehensive index system to evaluate the performance of local government housing security has not been constructed yet. Based on the basic theory of public sector performance evaluation, a two-dimensional conceptual model of performance evaluation is built, and a performance evaluation index system of housing security for China’local government is designed, which includes two first-class indexes, four second-class indexes, and 18 third-class indexes. The method calculating the overall evaluation value of housing security performance of China’local government has been given. And a case study is made to proof the maneuverability of the index system. As methods and tools, the index system designed is of great importance to promote China’s housing security.

Key words: housing security, performance evaluation, index system, local government

中图分类号:

G311

高义, 戚巍, 易勇. 我国地方政府住房保障绩效评估指标体系研究 —基于"目标—标杆"二维视角[J]. 科研管理, 2012, (6): 154-160.

Gao Yi, Qi Wei, Yi Yong. The performance evaluation index system of housing security of China’s local government—Based on a two-dimensional perspective of objective and benchmarking[J]. Science Research Management, 2012, (6): 154-160.

参考文献

[1] Berman, Evan & Wang, Xiaohu. Performance Measurement in U.S. Counties: Capacity for Reform [J].Public Administration Review, 2000, 60(5):409-420.
[2] Arellano-Gault, David. The Evaluation of Performance in the Mexican Federal Government: A Study of the Monitoring Agencies' Modernization Process [J]. Public Administration Review, 2011, 72(1):135-142.
[3] Lee, Jack Yun-jie & Wang, Xiaohu. Assessing the Impact of Performance-Based Budgeting: A Comparative Analysis across the United States, Taiwan, and China [J] Public Administration Review, 2009, 69:S60-S66.
[4] Ho, Alfred Tat-Kei. PBB in American Local Governments: It’s More than a Management Tool [J]. Public Administration Review, 2011, 71(3):391-401.
[5] 陈振明.公共管理学——一种不同于传统行政学的研究途径[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003:27.
[6] 王臻荣,任晓春.我国地方政府绩效模型的构建与分析[J].中国行政管理,2011(11):24-28.
[7] 吴建南,阎波. 地方政府绩效评估体系的路径选择——福建的分析[J].中国行政管理,2008(2): 25-29.
[8] 刘志刚,胡税根,刘静.辽宁省级部门绩效评估模型及实证研究[J].科研管理,2011,32(1): 106-110.
[9] 中国行政管理学会课题组.政府部门绩效评估研究报告[J].中国行政管理,2006(5):11-16.
[10] 吴宾,孙慧慧.廉租住房保障的政府绩效评估初探[J].长春工程学院学报(社会科学版),2011,12(1):44-48.
[11] Natividade-Jesus, E., J. Coutinho-Rodrigues and C.H. Antunes. A Multicriteria Decision Support System for Housing Evaluation[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2007, 43: 779-790.
[12] Kim,S.S., et al. Development of a Housing Performance Evaluation Model for Multi-family Residential Building in Korea[J]. Building and Environment, 2005, 40(80):1103-1116.
[13] In,J.K.,Y.K. Geun and Y.Juhyun. Estimation of the Tenants’ Benefits Residing in Public Rental Housing with Unit Size Constraint in Korea[J]. Urban Studies, 2004,41(8):1521.
[14] 王乐夫,蔡立辉.公共管理学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003:456.
[15] 安萌.公共部门的绩效评估研究综述[J].中国集体经济,2008(6):30-31.
[16] Behn RD. Why measure performance? Different Purposes Require Different Measures [J]. Public Administration Review, 2003,63(5): 586-606.
[17] Peter F. Drucker. The Practice of Management[M]. New York: Harper Press, 1954.
[18] Alexnder Kouzmin et al. Benchmarking and Performance Measurement in Public Sectors: Towards Learning for Agency Effectiveness [J]. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 1999, 12(2):121-144.
[19] 曹信邦.政府社会保障绩效评估指标体系研究[J].中国行政管理,2006(7):30-34.

我国地方政府住房保障绩效评估指标体系研究 —基于"目标—标杆"二维视角

The performance evaluation index system of housing security of China’s local government—Based on a two-dimensional perspective of objective and benchmarking

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	李康范跃进. “双一流”目标下一流大学科研效率评价[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(9): 41-47.
[2]	杨阳刘文飞丁堃. 高校专利技术转移绩效评价指标构建及实证[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(7): 189-199.
[3]	陈那波陈永宏谭茼丹. 政府绩效评估中的“控制权”分配与行动逻辑[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(5): 191-199.
[4]	崔少泽邱华昕王苏桐. 城市人才吸引力评价模型研究——以深圳市为例[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(7): 60-67.
[5]	赵云辉, 王蕾, 冯泰文, 张雪. 新冠疫情下政府差异化复工复产路径研究[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(4): 191-200.
[6]	朱梦菲，陈守明，邵悦心. 基于AHP-TOPSIS和SOM聚类的区域创新策源能力评价[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(2): 40-50.
[7]	赵彦飞，李雨晨，陈凯华. 国家创新环境评价指标体系研究：创新系统视角[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(11): 66-74.
[8]	孟溦，宋娇娇. 新型研发机构绩效评估研究——基于资源依赖和社会影响力的双重视角[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(8): 20-31.
[9]	唐谷文，王能民，张萌. 企业绿色增长指标体系设计与评价[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(7): 47-58.
[10]	郑秀梅王海燕. “双创”驱动经济发展的效果评价研究[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(4): 44-53.
[11]	王雪冬田明昊匡海波. 初生期创业企业商业模式预评价指标体系构建研究[J]. 科研管理, 2018, 39(9): 159-168.
[12]	孟斌,钮尓轩,匡海波,骆嘉琪. 基于云模型的企业社会责任评价模型及应用[J]. 科研管理, 2018, 39(7): 139-150.
[13]	贺翔. 地方政府助力“海归”高层次人才的企业突破创业期瓶颈之对策研究——以宁波市为例[J]. 科研管理, 2018, 39(6): 30-36.
[14]	阎波,武龙,韩东伶，程齐佳徴,吴建南. 土地财政对区域创新的影响研究——来自中国省际面板数据的证据[J]. 科研管理, 2018, 39(5): 38-45.
[15]	匡海波余方平谭志加孟强赵广田. 港口供需匹配非均衡评价模型及实证[J]. 科研管理, 2018, 39(4): 113-123.