不同功能分类科技园的资源供给差异研究

科研管理 ›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (9): 35-43.

不同功能分类科技园的资源供给差异研究

杨震宁, 吴杰

对外经济贸易大学国际商学院,北京 100029

收稿日期:2009-12-21 修回日期:2010-09-02 出版日期:2011-09-27 发布日期:2011-09-22
作者简介:杨震宁(1976-),男(汉),天津人,管理学博士,对外经济贸易大学国际商学院副教授,硕士研究生导师,研究方向为创业与创新管理。吴杰(1975-),男(汉),江西省临川人,对外经济贸易大学国际商学院硕士研究生,研究方向为创业与创新管理。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目(70972022)(2010年1月-2012年12月)和2009年对外经济贸易大学新进教师科研启动项目(09QD16)(2009年11月-2010年11月)部分研究成果。

The resources supplies' difference by different functional science parks

Yang Zhenning, Wu Jie

School of Business, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China

Received:2009-12-21 Revised:2010-09-02 Online:2011-09-27 Published:2011-09-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 不同功能的科技园区为入驻企业提供的资源也是差异化的,研究把国内科技园区分为五类:综合功能型科技园,基础研究型科技园,技术研发型科技园,高技术产品加工区以及孵化器。利用量表设计和问卷调查方式,收集初级数据,建构方差分析和分组样本的探索性因子分析模型,讨论不同功能科技园提供资源的差异性。研究结果显示,不同功能的科技园区所供给的资源是显著差异的,这些资源差异性包括市场对接机会、人才集聚效应、产业集群的成熟度和功能、提供的研究资源以及竞争机制的差异性。从具体的科技园区功能分类来看,不同功能的科技园区所提供的资源既有共性也存在显著差异,研究中讨论了不同功能定位的科技园提供资源的重点不同,并根据研究结论提出相应的政策建议。

关键词: 科技园, 功能分类, 资源供给, 差异分析

Abstract: Different functional Science Park provides resources to firms which is also different. The Science Parks are divided into five kinds; they are comprehensive function Science Park, basic research Science Park, technical research Science Park, high-tech product processing region as well as incubator. Using the scale design and the questionnaire survey to collect primary data, the ANOVA and EFA models of grouping sample are constructed, and the difference resources provided by different functional Science Park are discussed. The research demonstrated that Science Parks' functional difference has significant influence on resources' supply; these difference resources include the market opportunity, the talented person accumulative effect, the cluster's maturity, research resources, and competitive mechanism, etc. Based on the concrete Science Parks' functional classification, the fact that different functional Science Park provides different resource is discussed, and finally the corresponding policy proposal according to the research conclusion is put forward.

Key words: Science Park, functional classification, resource supply, difference analysis

中图分类号:

F276.44

杨震宁, 吴杰. 不同功能分类科技园的资源供给差异研究[J]. 科研管理, 2011, 32(9): 35-43.

Yang Zhenning, Wu Jie. The resources supplies' difference by different functional science parks[J]. Science Research Management, 2011, 32(9): 35-43.

参考文献

[1] 杨震宁,王以华. 国内外科技园的优势匹配及操作分工 [J]. 改革. 2008(2):93-98. [2] 钟书华. 科技园区管理 [M]. 北京:科学出版社,2005. [3] Castells Manuel, Peter Hall. Technopoles Mines and Foundries of the Information Economy [M]. In Technopoles of the World London Routledge, 1998. [4] 王缉慈. 创新的空间—企业集群与区域发展 [M]. 北京大学出版社,2008. [5] Flynn. D. M. A critical Exploration of Sponsorship, Infrastructure, and New organizations [J]. Small Business economics, 1993(5): 129-156. [6] Conceicao Vedocello, Science Parks and University-industry Interaction: geographical proximity between the agents as a driving force [J], Techonvation, 1997, 17(9): 491-502 [7] Rice, M.P, Co-production of Business Assistance in Business Incubators: An Exploratory Study [J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2002, 17: 163-187. [8] Jun Koo, Technology Spillovers, Agglomeration, and Regional Economic Development [J]. Journal of Planning Literature, 2005(20): 99-115. [9] John Phillimore. Beyond the linear view of innovation in Science Park evaluation: an analysis of western Australian technology park [J]. Technovation, 1999(19): 673-680. [10] Donald S. Siegel, Paul Westhead, and Milk Wright. Assessing the impact of university Science Parks on research productivity: exploratory firm-level evidence from the United Kingdom [J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2003(21): 1357-1369. [11] Hans L fsten and Peter Lindel f. Science Parks and growth of new technology-based firms-academic-industry links, innovation and markets [J]. Research Policy, 2002(31): 859-876. [12] Mariagrazia Squicciarini. Science Parks' tenants versus out-of-park firms: who innovates more? Aduration model [J]. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2008(33): 45-71. [13] 杨震宁,吕萍,王以华. 科技园的创新环境对园内企业绩效的影响[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2008(7): 102-107. [14] Sherman, H.F. Assessing the intervention effectiveness of business incubation programs on new business start-up [J]. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 1999, 24 (2):35-49. [15] Pedhazur, E.J. and Schmelkin, L.P. Measurement, Design, and Analysis: An Integrated Approach [M]. Hillsdale, N. J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1991. [16] Klein, K.J., Danserau, F. and Hau, R.J. Level issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1994, 19: 195-229. [17] Nobuya Fukugawa, Science parks in Japan and their value-added contributions to new technology-based firms [J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2006, 24: 381-400. [18] L fsten, H., Lindel f, P. Science parks in Sweden-Industrial renewal and development? [J]. R&D Management, 2001, 21 (1): 45-57. [19] Chun-An Chen. The Investigation for the Establishment of Science Parks: The Case of Taiwan [J]. Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge. 2006, 8(1): 62-69. [20] Cooper, A.C. The role of incubator organizations in the founding of growth-oriented firms [J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 1985, 34 (3): 94-116. [21] 原长弘,贾一伟. 国内大学科技园区技术创业企业创新网络初步研究[J]. 科研管理,2005(6):26-31. [22] Carayannis, E.G., Popescu, D., Sipp, C., McDonald, S., Technological learning for entrepreneurial development in the knowledge economy (KE): case studies and lessons learned [J]. Technovation, 2006, 26(4): 419-443. [23] McAdam, M., McAdam, R., The networked incubator: the role and operation of entrepreneurial networking with the university science park incubator (USI) [J]. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 2006, 7(2): 87-97. [24] Lee, S., Osteryoung, J., A comparison of critical success factors for effective Operations of University Business incubators in the United States and Korea [J]. Journal of Small Business Management, 2004, 42(4): 418-427. [25] Rothschild, L., Darr, A., Technological incubators and the social construction of innovation network [J]. Technovation, 2005, 25(1): 59-69. [26] Bollinger, L., Hope, K., Utterback, J. A review of literature and hypotheses on new technology-based firms [J]. Research policy, 1983, 12: 1-4.