我国政府R&D税收优惠强度的测算及影响效应检验

王俊

科研管理 ›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (9) : 157-164.

PDF(954 KB)
PDF(954 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (9) : 157-164.
论文

我国政府R&D税收优惠强度的测算及影响效应检验

  • 王俊
作者信息 +

The measure of government R&D tax incentive intensity and its effect verification in China

  • Wang Jun
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

本文运用R&D税收优惠的METC、B指数和R&D使用成本等三个指标测算了我国政府对企业R&D税收优惠强度,并与世界主要国家指标进行比较,发现我国R&D税收优惠强度居于中等水平。在以我国1995~2008年的28个制造业数据为样本的实证检验中,发现政府R&D税收优惠对企业R&D支出的激励效应是显著的,而且在高科技企业中激励效应更为明显。本文的政策启示在于我国政府应调整R&D资助方式,逐渐加大对企业R&D税收优惠的范围和幅度,不断降低政府直接资助的比重。

Abstract

The government R&D tax incentive intensity in China is calculated using METC, B index, and R&D cost. The outputs reveal that Chinese R&D tax incentive intensity lies in the middle class compared with major countries in the world. It is found that the impact of R&D tax incentive on enterprise R&D expenditure is significant after empirical verification using manufacturing industries data during the period of 1995-2008 in China. The incentive effects for high-tech enterprises are more significant. Policy implications are that Chinese government should make adjustments on the way of R&D funding, and gradually expand the scope of tax incentives for enterprises in order to reduce the proportion of direct funding by government.

关键词

R&D税收优惠 / 激励强度 / 影响效应

Key words

R&D tax incentive / incentive intensity / impact effect

引用本文

导出引用
王俊. 我国政府R&D税收优惠强度的测算及影响效应检验[J]. 科研管理. 2011, 32(9): 157-164
Wang Jun. The measure of government R&D tax incentive intensity and its effect verification in China[J]. Science Research Management. 2011, 32(9): 157-164
中图分类号: F221   

参考文献

[1] 冯·布朗. 创新之战[M]. 北京:机械工业出版社,1999: 8-15. [2] Bloom, N., Griffith, R., Reenen, John Van, Do R&D tax credits work? Evidence from a panel of countries 1979-1997[J], Journal of Public Economics, 2002, 85, 1-31. [3] Warda, J., Canadian R&D tax treatment: an international comparison , Vol, Resport, No, 125-194,1994, The Conference Board of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario. [4] Warda, J., Tax treatment of business investments in intellectual assets: an international comparison[J], OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers,4. 2006. [5] Eisner, R., Albert, S., and Sullivan, M., The new incremental tax credit for R&D: incentive or disincentive?[J]. National Tax Journal, 1984, 37(2),171-185. [6] Berger, P., Explicit and implicit effects of the R&D tax credit[J], Journal of Accounting Research, 1993,31, 131-171. [7] Hall, B., Effectiveness of research and experimentation tax credits: Critical literature review and research design[J], Report to Office of Technology Assessment, Congress of the United States, 1995. [8] Dagenais, M., Mohen, P., Thierrien, P., Do Canadian firms respond to fiscal incentives to research and development[M], Tilburg University, Holland, Mimeo,1997. [9] Guellec, D., B. van Pottelsberghe, The impact of public R&D expenditures on business R&D[J], Economics of Innovation and New technologies, 2003, 12(3),225-244. [10] 朱平芳、徐伟民. 政府的科技激励政策对大中型工业企业R&D投入及其专利产出的影响——上海市的实证研究[J]. 经济研究,2003(6):45-53. [11] Lob, Peter D. and Vincent Lin, Research and development in the pharmaceutical industry-A specification error approach [J], Journal of Industrial Economics, 1977, 26(1): 45-51. [12] 吴延兵. R&D存量、知识函数与生产效率[J]. 经济学(季刊),2006,5(4):1129-1156. [13] Blundell, Richard, Rachel Griffith and Frank Windmeijer, Individual effects and dynamics in count data[J], Journal of Econometrics, 2002,108, 113-131. [14] Bosch, Mariano, Daniel Lederman and William F. Maloney, Patenting and research and development: A global view[J], World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 3739, 2005.

基金

教育部人文社科青年基金项目(09YJC790241,2010,01~2012,12)、教育部省部共建基地项目(2009JJD790059,2010,01~2012,12)、教育部人文社科基地浙江工商大学现代商贸研究中心项目(09JDSM07YB,2010,02~2011,02)、浙江工商大学金融学研究中心基金项目(2010,06~2011,06)。


PDF(954 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/