学术刊物审稿公平感与投稿意愿关系实证研究

PDF(947 KB)

科研管理 ›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (8) : 142-150.

论文

学术刊物审稿公平感与投稿意愿关系实证研究

朱其权, 龙立荣

作者信息 +

The relationship between peer review justice and submission intention

Zhu Qiquan, Long Lirong

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

妥善处理退稿是关系到学术期刊提升竞争力、创建良好学术品牌的关键环节。本文以国内某研究型大学的286名有过拒稿经历的年轻学者为对象,采用问卷法,探究在拒稿情况下投稿者的审稿公平对于投稿意愿的影响。研究结果发现:(1)在程序、信息、人际三种审稿公平类型中,信息公平对于投稿意愿有显著的积极影响,并为整体公平感完全中介;(2)版面费对于信息公平与投稿意愿的关系存在正向调节作用,而期刊等级的调节效应不显著;(3)整体公平感是区别于具体公平(程序、人际和信息)的构念,对于投稿意愿有额外的解释效力。

Abstract

It is of great importance for academic journals to appropriately handle manuscripts rejection in order to enhance the competitiveness and create academic reputation. Aimeing at the influence of peer review justice perception on submission intention, a survey on 286 young scholars who experienced manuscript rejection from a research-oriented university is examined. The results show that (1) among three types of peer review justice (procedural, interpersonal, and informational justice), only informational justice has a significantly positive impact on submission intention, which is fully mediated by overall justice; (2) publication fee plays a positive moderating role on the relationship between information justice and submission intention. However, the moderating effect of academic journal level is insignificant; (3) Overall justice is a distinct construct from procedural, informational, and interpersonal justice, and accounts for additional explanation effect on submission intention.

导出引用

朱其权, 龙立荣. 学术刊物审稿公平感与投稿意愿关系实证研究[J]. 科研管理. 2011, 32(8): 142-150

Zhu Qiquan, Long Lirong. The relationship between peer review justice and submission intention[J]. Science Research Management. 2011, 32(8): 142-150

中图分类号： C93

参考文献

[1] 周国清. 理解·尊重·稳定: 编辑退稿的作者意识论[J]. 株洲工学院学报, 2004, 18(3): 10-13. [2] 何洪英, 李家林, 朱丹等. 论科技学术期刊稿件录用率的调控[J]. 编辑学报, 2008, 20(3): 191-193. [3] 幸建华. 稿件处理的艺术[J]. 江汉大学学报(社会科学版), 2008, 25(4): 98-99. [4] 岳建华, 李小萍, 尤伟杰等. 科技期刊退稿工作中的人文关怀[J]. 编辑学报, 2007, 19(3): 59-60. [5] Gilliland, S. W. & Beckstein, B. A. Procedural and distributive justice in the editorial review process [J]. Personnel Psychology, 1996, 49(3): 669-691. [6] Joann, M., & Robert, P. Back stage at social problems: An analysis of the editorial decision process, 1993 1996 [J]. Social Problems, 2001, 48(1): 1-39. [7] Leventhal, G. S. What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships . In K.J. Gergen, M.S. Greenbers, & R.H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research. Plenum, New York, 1980, 27-53. [8] Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. F. Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness . In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research in negotiations in organizations. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1986, 1: 43-55. [9] Barclay, L. J., Skarlicki, D. P., & S. Douglas Pugh. Exploring the role of emotions in injustice perceptions and retaliation [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2005, 90(4): 629-643. [10] Greenberg, J. Losing sleep over organizational injustice: Attenuating insomniac reactions to underpayment inequity with supervisory training in interactional justice [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2006, 91(1): 58-69. [11] Wenzel, M. A letter from the tax office: Compliance effects of informational and interpersonal justice [J]. Social Justice Research, 2006, 19(3): 345-364. [12] Colquitt, J. A., & Shaw, J. C. (2005). How should organizational justice be measured? In J. Greenberg, & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2005, 3-56. [13] Lind, E. A. Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations . In J. Greenberg, & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2001a, 56-88. [14] Cropanzano, R., Byrne, Z. S., Bobocel, D. R., & Rupp, D. R. Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice [J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2001, 58: 164-209. [15] Jones, D. A., & Martens, M. L. The mediating role of overall fairness and the moderating role of trust certainty in justice-criteria relationships: Testing fundamental tenets of fairness heuristic theory [J]. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2007. [16] Ambrose, M. L. & Schminke, M. The role of overall justice judgments in organizational justice research: A test of mediation [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2009,94, 491-500. [17] 陈光熙. 期刊等级小议[J]. 图书馆理论与实践, 2008(3):74-75. [18] 刘雯.中文专业期刊等级划分的现状分析与探讨[J]. 现代信息, 2007, 8: 196-198. [19] Colquitt, J. A. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, 86: 386-400. [20] 任星耀, 钱丽萍. 基于制度环境和任务环境观点的厂商关系管理[J]. 南开管理评论, 2009, 12(4): 26-35 [21] Podsakoff, P.M., & Organ, D.W. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects [J]. Journal of Management, 1986, 12(4): 531-544. [22] 温忠麟, 张雷, 侯杰泰, 刘红云. 中介效应检验程序及其应用[J]. 心理学报, 2004, 36 (5): 614-620. [23] 谢宝国, 龙立荣. 优势分析方法及其应用[J]. 心理科学, 2006, 29 (4): 922-925. [24] 龙立荣. 层级回归方法及其在社会科学中的应用[J]. 教育研究与实验, 2004(1): 45-51 [25] 温忠麟, 侯杰泰, 张雷. 调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用[J]. 心理学报, 2005, 37(2) : 268-274. [26] Lind, E. A. Thinking critically about justice judgments [J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2001b, 58: 220-226. [27] Ambrose, M. L., & Arnaud, A. (2005). Distributive and procedural justice: Construct distinctiveness, construct interdependence, and overall justice . In J. Greenberg & J. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2005, 59-84. [28] Ambrose, M. L., Hess, R. L., & Gansar, S. The relationship between justice and attitudes: An examination of justice effects on specific and global attitudes [J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2007, 103, 21-36. [29] 汪新艳. 中国员工组织公平感结构和现状的实证解析[J]. 管理评论, 2009, 21(9): 39-47. [30] Colquitt, J. A,Greenberg, J., Zapata-Phelan, C. P., What is organizational justice? A historical overview . In: J. Greenberg, & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.). Handbook of organizational justice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2005: 3-56. [31] Scott, B. A., Colquitt, J. A., & Zapata-Phelan, C. P. Justice as a dependent variable: Subordinate charisma as a predictor of interpersonal and informational justice perceptions [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2007, 92, 1597-1609. [32] Bies, R. J. Are procedural justice and interactional justice conceptually distinct? In J. Greenberg, & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2005, 85-112. [33] James Henslin 著,林聚仁译. 社会学入门[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,2007:142-143.