[1] W. M. Thomas, C. Kevin, The Interdisciplinary Study of Coordination[J], ACM Computing Surveys, 26 (1) (1994) 87-119.
[2] R. Grewal, G. L. Lilien, G. Mallapragada, Location, Location, Location: How Network Embeddedness Affects Project Success in Open Source Systems[J], Management Science, 52 (7) (2006) 1043-1056.
[3] Y. Tan, V. Mookerjee, P. Singh, Social Capital, Structural Holes and Team Composition: Collaborative Networks of the Open Source Software Community , proceedings of International Conference of Information Systems (ICIS 2007) , Montreal, Canada, 2007.
[4] A. MacCormack, J. Rusnak, C. Y. Baldwin, Exploring the Structure of Complex Software Designs: An Empirical Study of Open Source and Proprietary Code[J], Management Science, 52 (7) (2006) 1015-1030.
[5] Oh, W. and S. Jeon, Membership Herding and Network Stability in the Open Source Community: The Ising Perspective[J],Management Science, 2007. 53(7): p. 1086-1101.
[6] Cataldo, M., et al. Identification of coordination requirements: implications for the Design of collaboration and awareness tools . Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work . 2006. Banff, Alberta, Canada: ACM.
[7] D. Krackhardt, M. C. Kathleen, A PCANS Model of Structure in Organization , Proceedings of the 1998 International Symposium on Command and Control Research and Technology , Monterey, CA. , 1998.
[8] Carley, K.M., et al., Toward an Interoperable Dynamic Network Analysis Toolkit[J]. Decision Support Systems, Special Issue on Cyberinfrastructure for Homeland Security: Advances in Information Sharing, Data Mining, and Collaboration Systems, 2007. 43: p. 1324-1347.
[9] Bonaccorsi, A. and C. Rossi, Why Open Source software can succeed[J]. Research Policy Open Source Software Development, 2003. 32(7): p. 1243-1258.
[10] S. O'Mahony, Guarding the commons: how community managed software projects protect their work[J], Research Policy 32 (7) (2003) 1179-1198.
[11] E. v. Hippel, G. v. Krogh, Open Source Software and the "Private-Collective" Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science[J], Organization Science 12 (2) (2003) 209-223.
[12] U. Asklund, L. Bendix, A study of configuration management in open source software projects[J], Software, IEE Proceedings - 149 (1) (2002) 40-46.
[13] M. E. J. Newman, Modularity and community structure in networks , Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , National Academic Sciences, 2006.
[14] J. A. Roberts, I.-H. Hann, S. A. Slaughter, Understanding the Motivations, Participation, and Performance of Open Source Software Developers: A Longitudinal Study of the Apache Projects[J], Management Science, 52 (7) (2006) 984-999.
[15] M. T. Hannan, J. Freeman, Structural Inertia and Organizational Change[J], American Sociological Review 49 (2) (1984) 149-164.
[16] D. Krackhardt, ed. Graph Theoretical Dimensions of Informal Organizations[M]. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates, 1994.
[17] S. Wasserman, K. Faust, Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications [M], Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994.
[18] K. A. Manju, M. C. Kathleen, Network Structure in Virtual Organizations[J], Organization Science 10 (6) (1999) 741-757.
[19] L. C. Freeman, Centrality in Social Networks I: Conceptual Clarification[J], Social Networks 1 (1979) 215-239.
[20] E. Gamma, R. Helm, R. Johnson, J. M. Vlissides, Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software[M], Addison-Wesley Professional, 1994.
[21] K. R. Lakhani, E. von Hippel, How open source software works: "free" user-to-user assistance[J], Research Policy 32 (6) (2003) 923-943. |