日本企业在创新国际化上表现出与欧美企业不同的特色,本文对日本国际化大公司的专利进行分析从而观察其是否遵循异质互补的国际共识。研究选取五个日本国际化大公司和两个美国参照公司的专利作为讨论重点,并配合对全部电学领域专利的分析,考察日本企业的创新特征。本文的分析得出虽然日本企业在创新国际化上有明显的创新向心化倾向,但对资源寻求和能力互补战略的运用并不落后于美国的国际化大公司。本文的研究对于中国企业的启示是不应只看到日本企业在创新国际化中落后的一面,更应注重从其变化的趋势中思考企业创新战略。
Abstract
Japanese firms have been showing different characteristics in the innovation globalization. The patents of Japanese firms are analyzed to show whether or not they are performing the international wisdom of heterogeneous complementarity in the innovation. Patents from the database of OECD triadic patent families of five Japanese firms and two benchmark American firms in addition to all patent families within area H (Electrics) are analyzed. The results show that although Japanese firms have stronger centralization tendency comparing with their America rivals in innovation, in term of application of resources seeking and capability complementary strategies, Japanese firms stand the same position with their American counterparts. The meaning is that Chinese firms should be paid much attention not only to the backword status of Japanese firms in the innovation globalization, but also to their enterprise innovative strategy in the changing trends.
关键词
创新 /
专利 /
异质性 /
互补性
Key words
innovation /
patent /
heterogeneity /
complementarity
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Dunning, J. H.. American investment in British industry[M]. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1958.
[2] Vernon, R. International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics[J],1966, 80: 190-207.
[3] Doz, Y. & Santos, J. F. P. On the management of knowledge: From the transparency of collocation and co-setting to the quandary of dispersion and differentiation . INSEAD working paper series, Fontainbleau, 1997.
[4] Florida R. & Kenney M. The Globalization of Japanese R&D: The Economic Geography of Japanese R&D Investment in the United States[J]. Economic Geography, 1994,70(4): 344-369.
[5] Langlois, R., 1992. Transaction-cost economics in real time[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 1 (1), 99-127.
[6] UNCTAD. World investment report 2005: Transnational Corporations and the Internationalization of R&D . United Nations: New York, 2006
[7] Almeida, P. Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: patent citation analysis in the US semiconductor industry (Winter special issue)[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1996,17:155-165.
[8] Kenney, M. & Florida, R. Beyond mass production: The Japanese system and its transfer to the U.S [M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
[9] Patel, P., Vega, M. Patterns of internationalization of corporate technology: location versus home country advantages[J]. Research Policy, 1999, 28: 145-155.
[10] Le Bas C. & Sierra C. Location versus home country advantages' in R&D activities: some further results on multinationals' locational strategies[J]. Research Policy, 2002, 31: 589-609.
[11] Patel, P. Localized production of technology for global market[J]. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1999, 19: 141-153.
[12] Bartlett, C.A., Ghoshal, S. Managing innovation in the transnational corporation. Bartlett, C.A, Doz, Y., Hedlund, G.. Managing the global firm . London: Routledge. 1991. 215-255.
[13] Granstrand, O. Internationalization of corporate R&D: a study of Japanese and Swedish corporations[J]. Research Policy,1999,28: 275-302.
[14] Scherer, F.M. & Harhoff, D. Technology policy for a world of skew-distributed outcomes[J]. Research policy, 2000, 29: 559-566.
[15] Helene D.& M. Khan. Triadic patent families methodology . STI working papers, OECD, 2004.
基金
本文受到教育部人文社科基金:新兴经济在生产全球化中的纵向外溢阻断机理与技术接入障碍,2010.1-2012.12,09YJA790185;教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划(NCET-070308)和国家自然科学基金:集群、研发网络结构、知识流入/流出与企业创新绩效的关系(2010.1-2012.12:70972108)资助。
PDF(917 KB)
