我国国有企业绩效管理困境成因分析—基于G机场集团绩效管理项目的实地跟踪研究

科研管理 ›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6): 75-83.

我国国有企业绩效管理困境成因分析—基于G机场集团绩效管理项目的实地跟踪研究

穆胜

重庆大学经济与工商管理学院,重庆 400030

收稿日期:2010-07-20 修回日期:2011-01-06 出版日期:2011-06-27 发布日期:2011-06-14
作者简介:穆胜(1982-),男,重庆永川人,重庆大学经济与工商管理学院企业管理专业博士研究生,研究方向为战略管理及人力资源管理。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金"竞争性战略联盟的合作效应与效率边界研究"(项目批准号:70672012)。

The contribution factors of the dilemmas of performance managementin Chinese state-owned enterprises:A field tracking research on the performance management project of G Airport Group

Mu Sheng

School of Economics and Business Administration, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China

Received:2010-07-20 Revised:2011-01-06 Online:2011-06-27 Published:2011-06-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 我国国有企业绩效管理能否推行依赖于代理人的动机,这种动机由代理人损益决定,技术因素只是影响损益的因素之一。通过搭建代理人推行绩效管理的损益模型,刻画了国有企业诸多特性对于代理人损益的影响。通过对典型国有企业G机场集团推行绩效管理的过程进行实地跟踪研究,证实了这些影响的存在,明确了影响机制,为国有企业绩效管理困境成因给出了一种解释。绩效管理对代理人来说是长期投资,国有企业的产权属性和组织文化使投资期过于漫长,加上代理人的短期行为倾向和有限理性,导致绩效管理普遍被放弃。从根本上说,公有制经济中各级代理人剩余索取权的缺失是国有企业绩效管理困境的根本成因。

关键词: 国有企业, 绩效管理困境, 代理人损益

Abstract: The implementation of performance management of Chinese State-Owned Enterprises(SOE) depends on the agent's motive. This motive rests with the cost-benefit for the agent, and technical factor is just one of the factors affecting the cost-benefit. By establishing the cost-benefit model based on the agent implementation of performance management, several influences caused by the features of SOE on the cost-benefit of the agent are depicted. By the field tracking research on the process for implementing performance management of a typical SOE i.e. G Airport Group, the existence of these influences is confirmed, their mechanism is defined, and the dilemma of performance management in SOE is explained. For the agents, performance management is a long-term investment. The property right attribute and organizational culture of SOE make the investment period too long, with the short-term behavior tendency of the agent and their limited rationality, all of which lead to the loss of the performance management project. Essentially, the absence for the right of agent’s residual claims is the root which causes the dilemma of performance management in SOE.

Key words: state-owned enterprise, dilemma of performance management, cost-benefit for agent

中图分类号:

F272.92

穆胜. 我国国有企业绩效管理困境成因分析—基于G机场集团绩效管理项目的实地跟踪研究[J]. 科研管理, 2011, 32(6): 75-83.

Mu Sheng. The contribution factors of the dilemmas of performance managementin Chinese state-owned enterprises:A field tracking research on the performance management project of G Airport Group[J]. Science Research Management, 2011, 32(6): 75-83.

参考文献

[1] Alchain, A., Demsetz, H.. Production, information costs, and economic organization[J].The American Economic Review, 1972, 62:777-795. [2] 周其仁.市场里的企业:一个人力资本与非人力资本的特别合约[J].经济研究, 1996(6):71-79. [3] 徐操志,许庆瑞.关于业绩评价新范式的思考——基于智力资本的战略评价体系[J].自然辨证法通讯,2002(5):46-50. [4] 王悟,张堃.绩效评估精确性及其影响因素分析[J].管理评论,2004(4):59-61. [5] 李唯唯,穆胜.基于ERP平台的绩效管理模式研究[J].中国人力资源开发,2009(11):64-68. [6] 陈虹.国内企业绩效管理现状调查[J].中国人力资源开发,2003(10):56-59. [7] 刘耀中.成功实施绩效管理的关键行为因素结构及其与组织承诺和组织绩效的相关研究[J].心理科学,2007(4):967-970. [8] Porter, L. W., Lawler, E. E., Hackman, R. J.. Behavior in Organization[M]. McGraw-Hill Publishing, 1975. [9] Beer, M.. Performance Appraisal: Dilemmas and Possibilities[J]. Organizational Dynamics, 1981 Winter:24-36. [10] Banks, C. G., Murphy, K. R.. Toward Narrowing the Research-Practice Gap in Performance Appraisal[J]. Personnel Psychology, 1985, 38:335-345. [11] Schmitt, N., Klimoski, R. J.. Research Methods in Human Resources Management[M]. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Publishing. [12] Murphy, K. R., Cleveland, J. N.. Performance Appraisal: An Organizational Perspective[M]. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. [13] Salvemini, N. J., Reilly, R. R., Smither, J. W.. The Influence of of Rater Motivation on Assimilation Effects and Accuracy in Performance Ratings[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1993, 55:41-60. [14] Harris, M. M.. Rater Motivation in the Performance Appraisal Context: A Theoretical Framework[J]. Journal of Management, 1994, 20(4):737-756. [15] Mero, N. P., Motowidlo, S. J.. Effects of Rater Accountability on the Accuracy and the Favorability of Performance Ratings[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1995, 80:517-524. [16] 雷蒙德·A·诺伊等.人力资源管理:赢得竞争优势[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005. [17] 周其仁.公有制企业的性质[J].经济研究,2000(11):3-12. [18] 张维迎.公有制经济中的委托人——代理人关系:理论分析和政策含义[J].经济研究,1995(4):10-20. [19] 黎伟.转型经济中的国有企业组织文化变革研究[J].经济体制改革,2005(2):59-62. [20] Lawler, E. E.. Strategic Pay: Aligning organizational strategies and pay systems[M]. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. [21] 罗伯特·卡普兰,大卫·诺顿.平衡计分卡:化战略为行动[M].广东:广东经济出版社,2004. [22] 刘世锦.公有制经济内在矛盾及其解决方式比较[J].经济研究,1990(12):3-9. [23] McClelland, D. C.. The Achieving Society[M]. Princeton Press, 1961.