本文基于Nonaka的SECI模型,从知识属性、知识主体和知识活动三个维度刻画后发企业知识传导路径;然后,从知识活动、知识特性、知识接收方特性等层面构建了后发企业成本因素的实证研究框架,并重点探讨传导活动中的广度、密度、速度和交互度的四度成本因素及其影响机理;论文收集调研问卷数据,运用结构方程模型分析方法实证检验相关假设。研究表明,知识属性和知识主体等维度各因素通过对知识活动的作用而影响传导绩效。最后,从广度、密度、速度和交互度等方面提出了促进知识有效传导的机制。
Abstract
The knowledge transfer model for latecomer firms based on Nonaka's SECI model is put forward and the transferring process is described from three aspects: knowledge attribute, knowledge receiver, and transferring activities. Then, the cost factors are analyzed based on a four-dimensions-model according to the transfer process, and the theoretical model is constructed. By using structural equation model, the empirical data are collected by survey, and the investigation results are analyzed with LISREL8.0. Finally, some advices which promote knowledge transfer performance for latecomer firms are discussed according to the empirical result discussion.
关键词
后发企业 /
知识传导 /
成本因素 /
四度模型 /
结构方程
Key words
latecomer firm /
knowledge transfer /
cost factor /
four-dimension-model /
structural equation model
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 江积海.知识传导、动态能力与后发企业成长研究[J].研究与发展管理, 2006,18(2):22-27.
[2] Teece D.J. Technology Transfer by Multinational Firms: The Resource Cost of Transfering Technological Know-how[J]. Economic Journal, 1977(87):242-261.
[3] 王开明,万君康.论知识的转移与扩散[J].外国经济与管理,2000(10):2-7.
[4] 张睿,于渤.技术联盟组织知识转移影响因素路径检验[J]. 2009, 30(1):28-37.
[5] Marianna M., Peter L. A Search Theoreticmodel of Productivity, Science and Innovation[J]. R&D Managemnt, 2007, 37(4):303-317.
[6] Duanmua Jing-Lin, Felicia M. A Processual Analysis of Knowledge Transfer from Foreign MNEs to Chinese Supppliers[J]. International Business Review, 2007, 16(4):449-473.
[7] Nonaka I. & Takeuchi H. The Knowledge-Creating Company . New York; Oxford University press, 1995.
[8] Laursen K. & Salter A. Open for Innovation: the Role of Openness in Explaining Innovation Performance among U.K. Manufacturing Firms[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2006, 27(3):131-150.
[9] Figueiredo P.N. Learning Processes Features and Technological Capability-accumulation: Explaining Inter-firm Differences[J]. Technovation, 2002(22): 685-698.
[10] Reed R. & DeFillippi R.J. Causal Ambiguity, Barriers to Imitation and Sustainable Competitive Advantage[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1990, 15(1):88-102.
[11] 林筠,杨雪,李随成.隐性知识交流和转移与企业技术创新关系的实证研究[J].科研管理,2008,9(29): 16-23.
[12] Argote L., & Ingram P. Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2000, 82(1), 150-169.
[13] 陈力、宣国良.后发企业的知识整合能力提升研究[J]. 情报科学,2005 (12):1892-1898.
[14] Goh S. C. Managing Effective Knowledge Transfer: an Integrative Framework and some Practice Implications[J]. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2002(6): 3-29.
[15] 杨静.供应链企业间信任的产生机制及其对合作的影响－基于制造业企业的研究 .浙江大学博士论文, 2006.
基金
国家社会科学基金资助项目"后发企业知识传导的路径、成本及其机制研究"(07CTQ007),项目起止时间:2008.1－2010.12。
PDF(984 KB)
