通过对浙江287家创新型企业的问卷调查,本文从企业专利保护需求的视角对我国专利保护水平和专利政策发展方向进行研究。通过分析专利保护水平对创新型企业专利活动的影响机制,以及企业对我国专利保护水平的评价,探讨了创新型企业对于专利保护的内生需求,由此提出加强我国专利保护的政策建议。研究结果表明:随着我国专利制度水平的不断提高,创新型企业专利活动呈现出高水平、制度化的特点,但我国专利保护执法水平不高使企业技术创新与专利活动效率大大降低,大多数企业认为提高专利保护水平对促进企业加大研发投入、加快规模化发展具有积极作用。
Abstract
Through the questionnaires conducted in 287 innovative enterprises in Zhejiang Province, the level of patent actvity and the trend of patent policy in China are studied from the perspective of enterprises demand for patent protection. Based on the analysis on how patent protection level inflences the innovative enterprises and their grading of the patent protection level, the inner demand of innovative enterprises for patent protection is explored and then the suggestion on some policies to strengthen the patent protection in China is made. It is also revealed that as the patent protection level improves in China, the innovative enterprises are characterized with high-quality and normative patent protection activities. However, the ineffective patent law enforcement in China results in low efficiency of innovation and patenting. The majority enterprises insist on that an increasing patent protection level will pose a positive influence on the enterprises R&D investment and scale development.
关键词
专利保护水平 /
专利活动 /
技术创新
Key words
patent protection level /
patent activity /
technological innovation
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Nordhaus, W.D. Invention, Growth and Welfare: A Theoretical Treatment of Technological Change[M]. MIT Press. 1969.
[2] Waterson, M. Economic theory of the industry[M], Cambridge University Press,1984.
[3] Gallini, N.T. Patent Policy and Costly Imitation[J], Rand Journal of Economics, 1992,23(1):52-63.
[4] 寇宗来,张剑,周敏.专利保护宽度、非侵权模仿和垄断竞争[J].世界经济. 2007(1): 60-68.
[5] Grossman, G. and E.L.C. Lai. International Protection of Intellectual Property . NBER Working Paper No. 8704,2002.
[6] Mansfield, E. Patents and Innovation: an Empirical Study[J]. Management Science, 1986. 32(2): 173-181.
[7] Kanwar, S. and R. Evenson. Does Intellectual Property Protection Spur Technological Change? [J]. Oxford Economic Papers, 2003. 55(2): 235-264.
[8] Schneider, P.H. International trade, economic growth and intellectual property rights: A panel data study of developed and developing countries[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 2005. 78(2): 529-547.
[9] Mansfield, E. Intellectual Property Protection, Direct Investment, and Technology Transfer . International Finance Corporation Discussion Paper NO. 27. 1995.
[10] Park ,W. International patent protection: 1960-2005[J]. Research Policy,2008, 37(4): 761-766.
[11] 宋河发.专利保护程度评价体系与中美保护程度比较[J].科学学研究. 2007(4): 646-653.
[12] Cohen,M.Nelson,R and Walsh,P. Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not) . NBER Working Paper No. 7552,2000.
[13] Knut,B.Jakobe,E.Rainer,F. and U. Schmoch. Motives to patent:Empirical evidence from Germany [J]. Research Policy,2006.35(5):655-672.
[14] OECD. Patents and Innovation:Trends and Policy Challenges .2004,www.oecd.org.
[15] 易先忠,张亚斌,刘智勇. 自主创新、国外模仿与后发国知识产权保护[J]. 世界经济. 2007(3): 31-40.
[16] Awokuse, T.O. and H. Yin. Intellectual property rights protection and the surge in FDI in China [J]. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2010. 38(2): 217-224.
基金
国家社科基金项目:加快发展原创性高新技术产业对策研究(09BJY005),2009.6-2012.4;浙江省自然科学基金项目:浙江省创投机构网络式治理与绩效提升的内在机制研究(Y6110805),2011.1-2012.12。
PDF(934 KB)
