专利联营许可是专利联营的核心问题,专利联营各类许可过程实质是许可双方之间的博弈过程,博弈结果为是否签订许可契约。本文基于博弈模型,分别从两个侧面探讨专利联营各类许可行为的内在机理,认为无论哪一类许可,博弈双方之间均为竞合关系,其焦点是如何最大化各自利润。只有双方都达到利润预期,才能出现博弈均衡。在此基础上,为我国企业正确对待专利联营许可提供启示。
Abstract
As the core problem of patent pools, patent licensing of all kinds is the gaming process between the two parties in essence with the result is weather for not the contract for licensing is signed. Based on game models, the inner mechanism of patent pool licensing behavior is discussed from two aspects. Regardless of the kind of patent licensing, the relationship between the two parties is both competition and cooperation with the aim at maximizing their own profits. Only when the two parties gain their expected profits, then a gaming balance appears. In view of this, some enlightenment for Chinese enterprises on how to treat patent pool licensing correctly and appropriately are provided.
关键词
专利联营 /
许可 /
博弈 /
利润 /
竟合
Key words
patent pool /
licensing /
game /
profit /
competition and cooperation
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Andewelt, Roger B. Analysis of Patent Pools Under The Antitrust Laws[J]. Antitrust Law Journal, 1984(53): 611-639.
[2] Gilbert Goller, Competing, Complementary and Blocking Patents: Their Role in Determining antitrust Violations in The areas of Cross-Licensing, Patent Pooling and Package Licensing[J]. Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society, 1968(11):723-753.
[3] Carlson, S. C., Patent Pools and the Antitrust Dilemma[J]. Yale Journal on Regulation, 1999(16): 359-399.
[4] Newberg, J.A., Antitrust, Patent Pools, and The Management of Uncertainty[J]. Atlantic Law Journal, 2000(3).
[5] 张平. 专利联营之反垄断规制分析[J]. 现代法学, 2007(5):97-104.
[6] Heller MA, Eisenberg RS. Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anti-commons in Biomedical Research[J]. Science,1998,(280):698-701.
[7] Heller MA. The Tragedy of the Anti-commons[J]. Harvard Law Review, 1998,(111):621-688.
[8] Handin G. The Tragedy of the Commons[J]. Science 1968(162):1243-1248.
[9] Merges, R. P., Institutions for Intellectual Property Transactions: The Case of Patent Pools . University of California at Berkeley(Boalt Hall) School of Law, 1999.
[10] Shapiro C. Navigating the Patent Thick: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard Setting [J]. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 2000(1):119-150.
[11] Aoki, R.,Nagaoka, S., The Consortium Standard and Patent Pools[J].The Economic Review, 2004(55) 2004: 345-357.
[12] Aoki, R., Nagaoka, S., Coalition Formation for a Consortium Standard Through a Standard body and a Patent Pool: Theory and Evidence from MPEG2, DVD, and 3G," . Hitotsubashi University, 2005.
[13] Layne-Farrar, A & Lerner, J., To Join or Not To Join: Examination Patent Pool Participation and Rent Sharing Rules . LECG Consulting and Harvard University, 2006.
[14] 詹映,朱雪忠,长平彰夫. 专利池的形成之困: 基于博弈分析的一种新解释[J]. 中国软科学, 2009(11): 64-74.
[15] 梅开,杜晓君,杨昆明,冯国滨. 网络效应与专利联盟[J]. 科学学研究, 2010, 28(2): 211-214.
[16] 张维迎. 所有制、治理结构及委托-代理关系-兼评崔之元和周其仁的一些观点[J]. 经济研究, 1996(9):3-15.
[17] 曾德明,朱丹,彭盾. 技术标准联盟成员的谈判与联盟治理结构研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2007(3):16-21.
[18] 刘利,朱雪忠.专利联营促进竞争的多维优势研究[J]. 情报杂志,2010, 29(7): 30-34.
[19] Wagner, R.P. & Parchomovsky, G., Patent portfolios . Pennsylvania: School of Law and University of Pennsylvania,2004:5.
[20] Cournot, A., Researches into the Mathematical Principles of the Theory of Wealth[M]. originally published in French (1838), translated by Nathaniel Bacon, New York: Macmillan, 1897.
[21] Stackelberg, H. von, Market form und Gleichgewicht . Vienna: Juliu Springer, 1934.
基金
国家自然科学基金重点项目"促进我国自主创新的知识产权管理研究"(70633003,2007-01~2010-12)。
PDF(1107 KB)
