知识链组织研究与开发两阶段投入决策研究

吴绍波, 顾新

科研管理 ›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (11) : 45-51.

PDF(1195 KB)
PDF(1195 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (11) : 45-51.
论文

知识链组织研究与开发两阶段投入决策研究

  • 吴绍波1, 顾新2
作者信息 +

The investment decision model of knowledge chainat the two stages of research and development

  • Wu Shaobo1, Gu Xin2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

本文分析了在知识链组织研究与开发协作中,基础阶段的研究由代理组织承担,应用开发阶段的创新由核心企业完成的投入决策过程。研究表明:在序贯博弈情形下,核心企业所获得的收益越多,基础研究阶段的投入产出的弹性系数越高,核心企业对代理组织的补贴越多;核心企业和代理组织在合作博弈情形下比序贯博弈情形下所投入的研发费用更多;此外,合作博弈所产生的创新收益增量部分的合作租金的分配比例与风险厌恶程度负相关,与讨价还价能力无关,合作租金的溢价补贴部分与风险规避程度、讨价还价能力同时相关。

Abstract

The inputting decision process of research and development collaboration between the core enterprise and the agent in the knowledge chain is analyzed. In the collaboration process, the agent takes the responsibility of research in the basic stage and the core enterprise undertakes the innovation in the application and development stage. The research indicates that the higher the research stage benefits the core enterprise gains, the higher the elastic coefficient of input-output at the research stage is, the core enterprise gives more subsidies to the agent under sequential game. Both the core enterprise and the agent are willing to invest more under cooperative game than that under sequential game. Moreover, the distribution coefficient of cooperative rent from incremental innovation income produced by cooperative game is negatively correlated to the risk aversion degree, and it has nothing to do with the bargaining ability, meanwhile, the premium subsidy has a positive correlation to the risk aversion degree and the bargaining ability.

关键词

知识链 / 研究与开发 / 投入决策

Key words

knowledge chain / research and development / investment decision

引用本文

导出引用
吴绍波, 顾新. 知识链组织研究与开发两阶段投入决策研究[J]. 科研管理. 2011, 32(11): 45-51
Wu Shaobo, Gu Xin. The investment decision model of knowledge chainat the two stages of research and development[J]. Science Research Management. 2011, 32(11): 45-51
中图分类号: F273.1   

参考文献

[1] 顾新,郭耀煌,李久平.社会资本及其在知识链中的作用[J].科研管理,2003,24(5):44-48. [2] Argote,L.,Beckman,S.L.,Epple,D. The Persistence and Transfer of Learning in Industrial Settings [J]. Management Science,1990,(36):140-154. [3] C.W.Holsapple,M.Singh.The knowledge chain model:activities for competitiveness[J].Expert systems with Application,2001,(20):77-98. [4] TKCI(The Knowledge Company,Inc).Knowledge Chain Optimization Approach . http://www.knowledgecompanyinc.com,2009-12-28. [5] 徐建锁,王正欧,李淑伟. 基于知识链的管理[J].天津大学学报(社会科学版),2003,5(2):133-136. [6] 吴绍波,顾新. 知识链组织之间合作与冲突的稳定性结构研究[J].南开管理评论,2009,12(3):54-58,66. [7] 张军果,任浩. 供应链上下游企业合作研发博弈分析[J].华中师范大学学报(自然科学版),2007,41(2):206-210. [8] 李勇,张异,杨秀苔等. 供应链中制造商-供应商合作研发博弈模型[J].系统工程学报,2005,20(1):12-18 [9] Dyer J H,Singh H. The Relational View:Cooperative Strategy and Source of Interorganization Competitive Advantage[J]. Academy of Management Review,1998,23(4):660-679. [10] 熊运莲,熊中楷等. 基于效用理论的企业并购价格谈判的讨价还价模型[J].统计与决策,2005(10):16-18.

基金

国家自然科学基金资助项目 "基于知识链的知识网络的形成与演化研究"(批准号70771069,起止时间:2008.1-2010.12); 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划资助项目"知识链组织之间的冲突与冲突管理研究"(批准号NCET-06-0783,起止时间:2007.1-2009.12);重庆工商大学人才引进科研启动经费项目"知识链组织之间的合作机制研究"(批准号2010-56-15,起止时间:2010.9-2011.12)。


PDF(1195 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/