知识产权保护对于企业技术创新活动开展至关重要。本文旨在探讨发展中国家的知识产权保护与本国行业技术创新的内在关系。文章从行业技术结构的角度构建了两个理论模型,揭示了知识产权保护程度对行业技术创新的影响机制。模型结论显示,强知识产权保护对不同技术结构的行业的技术创新会产生不同影响:对发展中国家行业而言,当与发达国家的技术差距大时,强知识产权保护有利于内部技术差异大的本国行业的技术创新能力的增长;当与发达国家技术差距较小时,强知识产权保护政策会激励内部技术差异小的本国行业的技术创新,同时对内部技术差异大的本国行业的技术创新有抑制效果。因此,对于发展中国家的政策制定者而言,识别本国不同行业的技术结构——包括本国行业与发达国家的技术差距、本国行业内部的技术差异——是制定促进技术创新的知识产权保护政策的前提。
Abstract
Since Intellectual Property Right(IPR) protection is vital for the innovative activities of enterprises, the relationship between IPR protection policy and technological innovation is analyzed by constructing two theoretical models from the perspective of technical structure variables. The economic models indicate that stricter IPR protection will have different effects among industries with diverse technological structures in developing countries. To be specific, tightening IPR protection stimulates more innovation of technological- leading firms in developing countries in the context of larger technological gap from developed countries. However, in the context of smaller technological gap from outside, stricter IPR protection will have different impacts on the innovation, that is, stricter IPR protection enhances the innovation of neck-and-neck firms, however, hampers the innovation of the lagged firms. Therefore, distinguishing the different structure of each industry which includes the technological gap with developed countries and technological deviation within the industry will become the basis for the IPR policy-making.
关键词
技术创新 /
知识产权保护 /
技术结构 /
技术差距
Key words
technological innovation /
IPR protection /
technological structure /
technological gap
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 张平. 国家发展与知识产权战略实施[J]. 中国发明与专利, 2008(8):19-22.
[2] 富田彻男. 市场竞争中的知识产权[M]. 廖正衡译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2000.
[3] 方兴东. 知识产权过度保护与中国互联网发展 . 2007-04-27 . http://jiuban.chinalabs.com/view/ZXKM0QD9.html.
[4] Kim Linsu, Nelson R. Techonology, learning and innovation: experience of newly industrializing economics[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
[5] Gould D M, Gruben W C. The Role of Intellectual Property Rights in Economic Growth[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 1996, 48(2), 323-350;
[6] Chen Y, Puttitanun Thitima. Intellectual property rights and innovation in developing countries[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 2005, 78(2), 474-493
[7] Bessen J, Hunt R M. The software patent experiment .// OECD Conference Proceedings. Patents, Innovation and Economic Performance. Paris: OECD, 2004
[8] Bessen J, Maskin E. Sequential innovation, patents, and imitation. Economics , Working Papers 0025, Institute for Advanced Study, School of Social Science, 2006.
[9] Yang G, Keith E Maskus. Intellectual Property Rights, Licensing and Innovation in an Endogenous Product- cycle Model[J]. Journal of International Economics. 2001(53), 169-87
[10] Denicolo V. Patent races and Optimal Patent Breadth and Length [J], Journal of Industrial Economics, 1996(44), 249-265.
[11] Sunil Kanwar. Business enterprise R&D, technological change, and intellectual property protection[J]. Economics Letters, 2007, 96(1), 120-126.
[12] Dosi G, Marengo L, Pasquali C. How much should society fuel the greed of innovators? On the relations between appropriability, opportunities and rates of innovation[J]. Research Policy, 2006,35(8), 1110-1121.
[13] Aghion P, Harris C etc. Competition, Imitation and Growth with Step-by-step Innovation[J]. Review of Economic Studies 2001 (68), 467-492.
[14] Lee T, Wilde L L. Market structure and innovation: a reformulation[J]. Quarterly Journal of Eco nomics, 1980,94:429-436.
[15] Furukawa Yuichi. The protection of intellectual property rights and endogenous growth: Is stronger always better? [J] Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2007, 31(11): 3644-3670.
[16] Mariko Sakakibara, Lee Branstetter. Do stronger patents induce more innovation? Evidence from the 1988 Japanese patent law reforms[J]. The RAND Journal of Economics, 2001,32(1), 77-100.
[17] Brent B. Allred and Walter G. Park. The influence of patent protection on firm innovation investment in manufacturing industries[J]. Journal of International Management, 2007, 13(2), 91-109.
[18] Koleda G.. Patents' novelty requirement and endogenous growth[J]. Revue de' conomie Politique, 2005,114, 201-222.
[19] 苏东水. 产业经济学[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社. 2000:5.
[20] 植草益. 产业组织论[M]. 卢东斌译. 北京:中国人民大学出版社.1988: 16.
[21] Grossman G M, Helpman E. Endogenous product cycles[J]. The Economic Journal, 1991a, 101(408): 1214-1229.
[22] Grossman G M, Helpman E. Quality ladders and product cycles[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1991b, 106(2):557-586.
[23] Grossman G M, Helpman E. Quality ladders in the theory of growth[J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 1991c, 58(1): 43-61.
[24] Deardorff A V. Welfare effects of global patent protection[J]. Economica, 1992, 59(233):35-51.
[25] Diwan I, Rodrik D. Patents, appropriate technology, and North-South trade[J]. Journal of International Economics, 1991, 30(1-2): 27-47.
[26] Taylor M S. Trips, trade, and technology transfer[J]. International Economic Review 1994, 35:361-381.
[27] Madden G, Savage S J. Telecommunications productivity, catch-up and innovation[J]. Telecommunications Policy, 1999, 23(1):65-81.
[28] Weiss P. Adoption of product and process innovations in differentiated markets: the impact of competition[J]. Review of Industrial Organization, 2003, 23: 301-314.
[29] Timothy K C. Technological opportunity and the relationship between innovation output and market structure[J]. Managerial & Decision Economics, 2005, 26: 209-222.
[30] Helpman E. Innovation, imitation, and intellectual property rights[J]. Econometrica, 1993, 61(6):1247-1280.
[31] Mondal D, Gupta M R. Intellectual property rights protection and unemployment in a North South model: a theoretical analysis[J]. Economic Modeling, 2008, 25(3): 369-394.
[31] Dreyfus S. Richard Bellman on the birth of dynamic programming[J]. Operations Research, 2002, 50(1):48-51.
[33] 贺贵才.技术创新与专利保护强度:基于行业技术结构分析. 北京:清华大学公共管理学院, 2010.
PDF(1136 KB)
