博士生科研绩效是其科研活动结果的综合反映,这一水平直接反映着博士生的培养质量,故有效的绩效管理对培养质量有着关键性作用。过去研究对博士生科研绩效影响因素的选择缺乏系统性,且未充分考虑学科差异对博士生科研绩效的影响。因此,本研究将以博士生所发表的论文所在的SCI分区等级作为因变量,博士生的生源质量、导师影响和学习绩效为自变量,以学科差异为调节变量(主要是比较物理学科与化学学科),运用中国科学技术大学2002、2003年入学的139名物理学科博士生与167名化学学科博士生为研究生样本,通过logistic回归分析,结果表明:学科差异对生源质量、导师学术身份、指导学生数与博士生科研绩效之间的关系有着调节作用。
Abstract
The research performance of doctoral students is recognized as the overall reflection of research outcome, the level of research performance would directly evaluate the quality of doctoral education. Therefore, the performance management plays a key role in the education quality. In existed studies, the impact factors selection for doctoral research performance is not systematic, and the impact of subjects on the doctoral research performance is never considered before. The SCI-journals rate which doctoral students publish papers in is selected as a dependent variable; quality of students, mentor influence, and learning performance are selected as impact factors of research performance, and subjects are selected as the moderator(comparison between physics and chemistry). The samples are collected from graduated doctoral students of University of Science and Technology of China (USTC) in the years of 2002 and 2003, which are 139 students with the major in physics and 167 students in chemistry. The results of Logistic regression analysis indicate that subject moderate the relationship among doctoral students' research performance, quality of students, mentor's academic status, and number of students.
关键词
博士生 /
科研绩效 /
学科差异
Key words
doctoral student /
research performance /
subject difference
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 顾云南. 完善招生政策 改革招生制度 确保博士生生源质量[J].中国高教研究, 2003(7): 43-45.
[2] 李彩丽,缪园. 硕士生生源质量与学位论文成绩的相关性分析[J].学位与研究生教育, 2009(9): 8-11.
[3] 陈珊,王建梁.导师指导频率对博士生培养质量的影响--基于博士生视角的分析和探讨[J].清华大学教育研究, 2006,27(3): 61-64.
[4] Li, S., & Seale, C. Managing criticism in PhD supervision: A qualitative case study [J]. Studies in Higher Education, 2007, 32(4); 511-526.
[5] Ives, G., & Rowley, G. Supervisor selection or allocation and continuity of supervision: PhD students' progress and outcomes [J]. Studies in Higher Education, 2005, 30(5); 535-555.
[6] 胡蓉, 魏永祥. 谈研究生培养质量影响因素及其改善[J].中国高等教育,2008(40): 40-42.
[7] Brewer, G.A., Douglas, J.W., Facer, R.L.Ⅱ& O'Toole, L.J.,Jr. Determinants of graduate research productivity in doctoral programs of public administration [J]. Public administration review, 1999, 59(5):373-382.
[8] Pelz, D.C.& Andrews, F.M. Scientists in Organizations: Productive Climates for Research and Development . Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI., 1976
[9] Robertson, J.,& Blackler, G. Students' experiences of learning in a research environment [J].Higher Education Research and Development, 2006, 25(3); 215-229.
[10] Hemlin,S. & Gustafsson, M. Research production in the arts and humanities: A questionnaire study of factors influencing research performance [J].Scientometrics,1996, 37(3):417-432.
[11] 古继宝, 田雯, 粱樑. 学术身份对科研项目申请的影响分析[J]. 科研管理, 2008,29(3):114-120.
PDF(1111 KB)
