开放式创新环境下企业专利管理与技术创新绩效之间彼此关联相互耦合。本文首先分析了体现二者之间耦合关系的主要因素,开发了衡量二者之间耦合效果的指标体系,然后运用层次分析法(AHP)构建了测度二者之间耦合效果的评估模型,并结合我国企业的现状对指标体系的权重进行了测度分析。结果表明企业的商业转化能力和开放式创新能力对二者之间耦合效果的影响十分显著,而资源配置能力和成果保护能力仍有待提升。本研究为我国企业在开放式创新环境下有针对性地加强专利管理与技术创新绩效之间的耦合、增强核心竞争力提供理论指导与方法借鉴。
Abstract
Under the circumstance of open innovation, an interrelated and mutually linkage exists between patent management and technological innovation performance in enterprises. First, the main linkage factors between patent management and technological innovation performance are analyzed, and then the indicators which affect the linkage factors are developed. Second, the assessment model is constructed to measure the linkage effect based on AHP. The results show that the commercialization ability and open innovation ability of the enterprises have the manifest strong impact on the linkage effect. In the meanwhile, the resource allocation ability and achievement protection ability of domestic enterprises need to be enhanced. These findings could provide a theoretical and methodical support to strengthen the linkage between patent management and technological innovation performance and also enhance the core competitiveness of the enterprises under the background of open innovation.
关键词
技术创新绩效 /
专利管理 /
关联耦合 /
测度模型 /
AHP
Key words
technological innovation performance /
patent management /
linkage /
assessment model /
AHP
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Chesbrough H. Open innovation, the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology [M].Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2003.
[2] Chesbrough H. Open business models: how to thrive in the new innovation landscape [M]. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2006.
[3] 赵远亮,周寄中,侯亮,许治.医药企业知识产权与经营绩效的关联性研究[J].科研管理, 2009, 30 (4):175-183.
[4] Sanjaya L. Indicators of the relative importance of IPRs in developing countries [J]. Research Policy, 2003, 32 (9):1657-1680.
[5] Hurmelinna P, Kylaheiko K, Jauhiainen T. The Janus Face of the appropriability regime in protection of innovations: theoretical reappraisal and empirical analysis [J]. Technovation,2007, 27 (3):133-144.
[6] Forero-Pineda C. The impact of stronger intellectual property rights on science and technology in developing countries [J]. Research Policy,2006, 35 (6): 808-824.
[7] Borg E A. Knowledge information and intellectual property implications for marketing relationships [J]. Technovation, 2001, 21(8):515-524.
[8] Ganguli P. Intellectual property rights: mothering innovation to markets [J]. World Patent Information, 2000, 22(1-2):43-52.
[9] 周寄中,赵远亮,叶治明.技术创新与知识产权联动[M].北京:科学出版社,2009.
[10] Zhang J.J., Rogers J.D. The technological innovation performance of Chinese firms: the role of industrial and academic R&D, FDI and the markets in firm patenting [J]. International Journal of Technology Management, 2009, 48(4):518-543.
[11] 单红梅.企业技术创新绩效的综合模糊评价及其应用[J].科研管理, 2002, 23(6):120-124.
[12] 高建,汪剑飞,魏平.企业技术创新绩效指标:现状、问题和新概念模型[J].科研管理, 2004, 25(z): 125-131.
[13] 尹建海,杨建华.基于加强型平衡记分法的企业技术创新绩效评价指标体系研究[J].科研管理, 2008, 29(1):1-7.
[14] Adner R, Kapoor R. Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2010, 31(3):306-333
[15] Sofka W, Grimpe C. Specialized search and innovation performance-evidence across Europe [J]. R&D Management, 2010, 40(3):310-323.
[16] Lichtenthaler U. Technology exploitation in the context of open innovation: finding the right job’ for your technology [J]. Technovation, 2010, 30(7-8):429-435.
[17] Laursen K, Salter A. Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K manufacturing firms [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2006, 27(2):131-150.
[18] 陈钰芬,陈劲.开放式创新:机理与模式[M].北京:科学出版社,2008.
[19] Chiang Y H, Hung K P. Exploring open search strategies and perceived innovation performance from the perspective of inter-organizational knowledge [J]. R&D Management, 2010, 40(3):292-299.
[20] Lichtenthaler U. Outbound open innovation and its effect on firm performance: examining environmental influences [J]. R&D Management, 2009, 39(4):317-330
[21] Liu X H, Buck T. Innovation performance and channels for international technology spillovers: Evidence from Chinese high-tech industries [J]. Research Policy, 2007, 36 (3): 355-366.
[22] Chiesa V, Frattini F, Lazzarotti V, Manzini R. Performance measurement in R&D: exploring the interplay between measurement objectives, dimensions of performance and contextual factors [J]. R&D Management, 2009, 39(5):488-519.
[23] Lynn G.S., Reilly R.R., Akgun A.E., Knowledge management in new product teams: practices and outcomes [J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2000, 47(2):221-231.
[24] Guan J C, Mok K C , Yam RCM., Chin K.S., Pun K F. Technology transfer and innovation performance: Evidence from Chinese firms [J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2006, 73 (6):666-678
[25] 冯晓青.企业知识产权战略 [M]. 北京:知识产权出版社,2005.
[26] Thornhill S. Knowledge, innovation and firm performance in high-and-low-technology regimes [J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2006, 21(5):687-703.
[27] 万小丽,朱雪忠.专利价值的评估指标体系及模糊综合评价[J].科研管理, 2008, 29(2):185-190.
[28] Saaty T. L. Modeling unstructured decision Problems: a theory of analytical hierarchies.Proceeding of the First International Conference on Mathematical, University of Missourerolla, St. Louis, MO, 1977, 69-77.
[29] Satty T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process [M]. New York: McGraw Hill, Inc., 1980.
基金
国家自然科学基金重点项目(71172092);华中科技大学自主创新基金研究项目(人文社会科学)(2010AW021);教育部人文社科基金项目(07JA630003)。
PDF(1037 KB)
