专利原创性对中小企业专利质押贷款的影响研究

潘鑫, 陈轩瑾

科研管理 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (9) : 176-187.

PDF(1201 KB)
PDF(1201 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (9) : 176-187. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2026.09.017  CSTR: 32148.14.kygl.2026.09.017

专利原创性对中小企业专利质押贷款的影响研究

作者信息 +

Research on the impact of originality on patent pledge financing for SMEs

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

已有研究表明,专利质押能有效缓解中小企业的融资约束,但如何获得更高额度贷款的机制尚未得到系统性阐释。基于信号理论的双过程框架,本研究以2016—2022年新三板中小企业专利质押数据为样本,实证检验了专利原创性与质押融资额度的关系。结果发现:专利原创性对质押融资金额存在显著的倒U型影响,即适度提升专利原创性可以通过强化信号可观测性增加贷款金额,但过高的原创性会因解码成本太高而抑制融资效果。进一步机制检验表明,两大因素能有效调节这一非线性关系:一是密切的银企互动,通过直接沟通与信任构建,降低银行的信号解读成本;二是董事会成员广泛的外部社会网络,其带来的专业背书与社会认证功能,增强银行对专利价值的识别能力。这两种机制均能使倒U型曲线变得更为陡峭,帮助企业在适度原创性区间内获得更高的融资溢价。本研究拓展了专利质押的前因研究,亦对中小企业专利组合管理和政府政策制定具有启示:适度提升专利原创性并加强与金融机构沟通,可在平衡创新价值与评估成本间获得更高质押融资额度,为破解创新溢价难兑现困境提供了理论依据。

Abstract

Existing research has shown that patent pledging can effectively alleviate financing constraints for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs),but the mechanism for obtaining higher loan amounts has not yet been systematically explained. Based on a dual-process framework of signalling theory,this study used patent pledge data from SMEs listed on the NEEQ between 2016 and 2022 as a sample,and empirically tested the relationship between patent originality and pledged financing amounts. The results showed that patent originality has a significant inverted U-shaped effect on pledged financing amounts,meaning that a moderate increase in patent originality can enhance loan amounts by strengthening the observability of signals. However,excessively high originality suppresses the financing effect due to high decoding costs. This non-linear effect is strengthened by two moderators:1) close bank-firm interactions,which lower decoding costs through communication and trust,and 2) board members' external social networks,which improve the bank's value assessment via professional endorsement. Both factors steepen the curve,allowing firms to capture a higher financing premium at optimal originality levels. This study expanded the research on the antecedents of patent pledging and will provide insights for SME patent portfolio management and government policy formulation:moderately increasing patent originality and strengthening communication with financial institutions can help achieve higher pledged financing amounts by balancing innovation value and evaluation costs,thus providing a theoretical basis for overcoming the challenge of "difficulties in realising innovation premiums".

关键词

专利质押 / 信号理论 / 原创性

Key words

patent pledge / signalling theory / originality

引用本文

导出引用
潘鑫, 陈轩瑾. 专利原创性对中小企业专利质押贷款的影响研究[J]. 科研管理. 2026, 47(9): 176-187 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2026.09.017
Pan Xin, Chen Xuanjin. Research on the impact of originality on patent pledge financing for SMEs[J]. Science Research Management. 2026, 47(9): 176-187 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2026.09.017
中图分类号: F273.1   

参考文献

[1]
赵振洋, 钟张慧, 李新丽, 等. 专利质押行权促进中小微企业创新的机制研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(12):170-178.
Zhao Zhenyang, Zhong Zhanghui, Li Xinli, et al. Research on the mechanism of patent pledge right exercising to promote the innovation of micro-,small-,and medium-sized enterprises[J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(12):170-178.
[2]
Choi Y R, Ha S, Kim Y. Innovation ambidexterity,resource configuration and firm growth:Is smallness a liability or an asset?[J]. Small Business Economics, 2022, 58(4):2183-2209.
[3]
薛明皋, 刘璘琳. 专利质押贷款环境下的专利价值决定因素研究[J]. 科研管理, 2013, 34(2):120-127.
Xue Minggao, Liu Linlin. The determinants of patent value in the environment of patent pledge loan[J]. Science Research Management, 2013, 34(2):120-127.
[4]
胡成, 朱雪忠. 基于专利信号的质押融资模式、困境与对策[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(3):109-119.
Hu Cheng, Zhu Xuezhong. The pledge financing mode,predicament and countermeasures based on patent signals[J]. Science Research Management, 2021, 42(3):109-119.
[5]
袁礼, 龚钰涵. 专利质押融资对创业活跃度的影响[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2023, 40(11):202-224.
Yuan Li, Gong Yuhan. Impact of patent pledge on entrepreneurial activity[J]. Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics, 2023, 40(11):202-224.
[6]
孟祥旭. 专利质押是否提升了企业全要素生产率?:基于中国专利质押试点的准自然实验[J]. 经济科学, 2022 (4):124-137.
Meng Xiangxu. Does patent pledge increase enterprises' total factor productivity? Based on the quasi-natural experiment of patent pledge pilot in China[J]. Economic Science, 2022(4):124-137.
[7]
袁礼, 周燕, 戴鹏毅. 专利质押对企业技术创新的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(6):174-182.
Yuan Li, Zhou Yan, Dai Pengyi. Research on the impact of patent pledges on technological innovation in enterprises[J]. Science Research Management, 2024, 45(6):174-182.
[8]
Pan X, Chen X, Qiu S. Pushing boundaries or overstepping? Exploring the paradoxical impact of radical innovation on government subsidies in Chinese SMEs[J]. Technovation, 2024, 132:102988.
[9]
Shkolnykova M, Kudic M. Who benefits from SMEs' radical innovations? Empirical evidence from German biotechnology[J]. Small Business Economics, 2022, 58(2):1157-1185.
[10]
Spence M. Job market signaling[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1973, 87(3):355-374.
[11]
Podolny J M. Status signals:A sociological study of market competition[M]. Princeton,New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2005.
[12]
Su W, Peng M W, Tan W, et al. The signaling effect of corporate social responsibility in emerging economies[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2016, 134(3):479-491.
[13]
Drover W, Wood M S, Corbett A C. Toward a cognitive view of signalling theory:Individual attention and signal set interpretation[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2018, 55(2):209-231.
[14]
Bafera J, Kleinert S. Signaling theory in entrepreneurship research:A systematic review and research agenda[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2023, 47(6):2419-2464.
[15]
Colombo M G, Guerini M, Hoisl K, et al. The dark side of signals:Patents protecting radical inventions and venture capital investments[J]. Research Policy, 2023, 52(5):104741.
[16]
Hirshleifer D, Hsu P H, Li D. Innovative originality, profitability,and stock returns[J]. The Review of Financial Studies, 2018, 31(7):2553-2605.
[17]
Bedford A, Ma L, Ma N, et al. Patenting activity or innovative originality?[J]. Accounting & Finance, 2021, 61(3):4191-4207.
[18]
Therrien P, Doloreux D, Chamberlin T. Innovation novelty and (commercial) performance in the service sector:A Canadian firm-level analysis[J]. Technovation, 2011, 31(12):655-665.
[19]
Wang Z, Jiang Z. How R&D originality affects open innovation under knowledge spillovers?[J]. European Journal of Innovation Management, 2020, 23(4):604-628.
[20]
Li G, Zhang R, Wang C. The role of product originality,usefulness and motivated consumer innovativeness in new product adoption intentions[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2015, 32(2):214-223.
[21]
Plantec Q, Le Masson P, Weil B. Impact of knowledge search practices on the originality of inventions:A study in the oil & gas industry through dynamic patent analysis[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2021, 168:120782.
[22]
Haans R F J, Pieters C, He Z L. Thinking about U:Theorizing and testing U- and inverted U-shaped relationships in strategy research[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2016, 37(7):1177-1195.
[23]
郑莹, 陈传明, 任华亮. 专利活动和市场价值:基于信号理论的解释[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2016, 37(3):68-78.
Zheng Ying, Chen Chuanming, Ren Hualiang. Patent activities and market value:An explanation based on signaling theory[J]. Science of Science and Management of S.&T., 2016, 37(3):68-78.
[24]
Briseño-García A, William Husted B, Arango-Herera E. Do birds of a feather certify together? The impact of board interlocks on CSR certification homophily[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2022, 144:336-344.
[25]
Helmers C, Patnam M, Rau P R. Do board interlocks increase innovation? Evidence from a corporate governance reform in India[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2017, 80:51-70.
[26]
谢绚丽, 赵胜利. 中小企业的董事会结构与战略选择:基于中国企业的实证研究[J]. 管理世界, 2011(1):101-111,188.
Xie Xuanli, Zhao Shengli. Between the structure of the board of directors of small-and medium-sized enterprises and the selection of strategies[J]. Journal of Management World, 2011(1):101-111,188.
[27]
谢志华, 张庆龙, 袁蓉丽. 董事会结构与决策效率[J]. 会计研究, 2011(1):31-37.
Xie Zhihua, Zhang Qinglong, Yuan Rongli. Corporate board's composition and decision-making efficiency[J]. Accounting Research, 2011(1):31-37.
[28]
Trajtenberg M, Henderson R, Jaffe A. University versus corporate patents:A window on the basicness of invention[J]. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 1997, 5(1):19-50.
[29]
Zhao T, Jones-Evans D. SMEs,banks and the spatial differentiation of access to finance[J]. Journal of Economic Geography, 2017, 17(4):791-824.
[30]
Barroso-Castro C, del Mar Villegas-Periñan M, Casillas-Bueno J C. How boards' internal and external social capital interact to affect firm performance[J]. Strategic Organization, 2016, 14(1):6-31.
[31]
Sapienza P. The effects of government ownership on bank lending[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2004, 72(2):357-384.
[32]
Higham K, de Rassenfosse G, Jaffe A B. Patent quality:Towards a systematic framework for analysis and measurement[J]. Research Policy, 2021, 50(4):104215.
[33]
Callaert J, Van Looy B, Verbeek A, et al. Traces of Prior Art:An analysis of non-patent references found in patent documents[J]. Scientometrics, 2006, 69(1):3-20.
[34]
Stopar K, Drobne D, Eler K, et al. Citation analysis and mapping of nanoscience and nanotechnology:Identifying the scope and interdisciplinarity of research[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 106(2):563-581.
[35]
Lind J T, Mehlum H. With or without U? The appropriate test for a U-shaped relationship[J]. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 2010, 72(1):109-118.

PDF(1201 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/